Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study of Bis(diphenylphosphino)(<i>N</i>‑thioether)amine-Type Ligands in Nickel(II) Complexes for Catalytic Ethylene Oligomerization

Abstract

Starting from the new ligands bis­(diphenylphosphino)­(<i>N</i>-4-(methylthio)­phenyl)­amine (<b>4</b>, N­(PPh<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(<i>p-</i>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>)­SMe) and its monosulfide derivative (Ph<sub>2</sub>P)­N­{P­(S)­Ph<sub>2</sub>}­(<i>p-</i>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>)­SMe (<b>4·S</b>), we have prepared and characterized, including by X-ray crystallographic studies, their Ni­(II) complexes [NiCl<sub>2</sub>{(Ph<sub>2</sub>P)<sub>2</sub>N­(<i>p-</i>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>)­SMe-<i>P</i>,<i>P</i>}] (<b>5</b>) and [NiCl<sub>2</sub>{(Ph<sub>2</sub>P)­N­{P­(S)­Ph<sub>2</sub>}­(<i>p-</i>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>)­SMe-<i>P</i>,<i>S</i>}] (<b>6</b>), respectively. The bis-sulfide compound N­{P­(S)­Ph<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>(<i>p-</i>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>)­SMe (<b>4·S</b><sub><b>2</b></sub>) was also prepared and structurally characterized. Computational studies showed that the combined influence of stronger P donors and a four-membered-ring <i>P</i>,<i>P</i> chelate leads to complex <b>5</b> being thermodynamically more stable than <b>6</b>, which contains one weaker PS donor group but a five-membered <i>P</i>,P<i>S</i> chelate ring. For comparison, the bis-chelate complex [Ni­{(Ph<sub>2</sub>P)­N­{P­(S)­Ph<sub>2</sub>}­(<i>p-</i>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>)­SMe-<i>P</i>,<i>S</i>}<sub>2</sub>]­(BF<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>7</b>), the monochelate complexes [NiBr<sub>2</sub>{(Ph<sub>2</sub>P)­N­{P­(S)­Ph<sub>2</sub>}­(<i>p-</i>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>)­SMe-<i>P</i>,<i>S</i>}] (<b>8</b>) and the Pd­(II) analogue of <b>6</b>, [PdCl<sub>2</sub>{(Ph<sub>2</sub>P)­N­{P­(S)­Ph<sub>2</sub>}­(<i>p-</i>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>)­SMe-<i>P</i>,<i>S</i>}] (<b>9</b>), were synthesized and structurally characterized and their solution behavior was investigated. The catalytic activity and selectivity in ethylene oligomerization of the Ni­(II) complexes <b>5</b> and <b>6</b> and their known <i>N</i>-(methylthio)­propyl analogues [NiCl<sub>2</sub>{(Ph<sub>2</sub>P)<sub>2</sub>N­(CH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>3</sub>SMe-<i>P</i>,<i>P</i>}] (<b>2</b>) and [NiCl<sub>2</sub>{(Ph<sub>2</sub>P)­N­{P­(S)­Ph<sub>2</sub>}­(CH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>3</sub>SMe-<i>P</i>,<i>S</i>}] (<b>3</b>), which were obtained from the bis­(diphenylphosphino)­(<i>N</i>-(methylthio)­propyl)­amine ligand N­(PPh<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(CH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>3</sub>SMe (<b>1</b>) and its monosulfide derivative (Ph<sub>2</sub>P)­N­{P­(S)­Ph<sub>2</sub>}­(CH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>3</sub>SMe (<b>1·S</b>), respectively, revealed a significant influence of the nature of the <i>N</i>-substituent (aryl vs alkyl thioether) and of the chelate ring size (<i>P</i>,P vs <i>P</i>,P<i>S</i>). DFT calculations showed that the trend in Δ<i>E</i><sub>rel</sub>, [NiCl<sub>2</sub>(<i>P</i>,<i>P</i>)] > [NiCl<sub>2</sub>(<i>P</i>,P<i>S</i>)] > [NiCl<sub>2</sub>(P<i>S</i>,P<i>S</i>)], results from the stronger covalent character of the Ni–P vs Ni–S bond. Using AlEtCl<sub>2</sub> as cocatalyst, mostly ethylene dimers were produced, with significant amounts of trimers (selectivity in the range 11–36%). Productivities up to 40400 and 48200 g of C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub>/((g of Ni) h), with corresponding TOF values of 84800 and 101100 mol of C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub>/ ((mol of Ni) h), were obtained with precatalysts <b>2</b> and <b>3</b>, respectively

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image

    Available Versions