Two [1,2,4-(Me<sub>3</sub>C)<sub>3</sub>C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>2</sub>]<sub>2</sub>CeH Molecules are Involved in Hydrogenation of Pyridine to Piperidine as Shown by Experiments and Computations

Abstract

Hydrogenation of pyridine to piperidine catalyzed by [1,2,4-(Me<sub>3</sub>C)<sub>3</sub>C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>2</sub>]<sub>2</sub>CeH, abbreviated as Cp′<sub>2</sub>CeH or [Ce]′-H, is reported. The reaction proceeds from Cp′<sub>2</sub>Ce­(2-pyridyl), isolated from the reaction of pyridine with Cp′<sub>2</sub>CeH, to Cp′<sub>2</sub>Ce­(4,5,6-trihydropyridyl), and then to Cp′<sub>2</sub>Ce­(piperidyl). The cycle is completed by the addition of pyridine, which generates Cp′<sub>2</sub>Ce­(2-pyridyl) and piperidine. The net reaction depends on the partial pressure of H<sub>2</sub> and temperature. The dependence of the rate on the H<sub>2</sub> pressure is associated with the formation of Cp′<sub>2</sub>CeH, which increases the rate of the first and/or second additions of H<sub>2</sub> but does not influence the rate of the third addition. Density functional theory calculations of several possible pathways are consistent with three steps, each of which are composed of two elementary reactions, (i) heterolytic activation of H<sub>2</sub> with a reasonably high energy, Δ<i>G</i><sup>⧧</sup> = 20.5 kcal mol<sup>–1</sup>, on Cp′<sub>2</sub>Ce­(2-pyridyl), leading to Cp′<sub>2</sub>CeH­(6-hydropyridyl), followed by an intramolecular hydride transfer with a lower activation energy, (ii) intermolecular addition of Cp′<sub>2</sub>CeH to the C<sup>4</sup>C<sup>5</sup> bond, followed by hydrogenolysis, giving Cp′<sub>2</sub>Ce­(4,5,6-trihydropyridyl) and regenerating Cp′<sub>2</sub>CeH, and (iii) a similar hydrogenation/hydrogenolysis sequence, yielding Cp′<sub>2</sub>Ce­(piperidyl). The calculations reveal that step ii can only occur in the presence of Cp′<sub>2</sub>CeH and that alternative intramolecular steps have considerably higher activation energies. The key point that emerges from these experimental and computational studies is that step ii involves two Cp′<sub>2</sub>Ce fragments, one to bind the 6-hydropyridyl ligand and the other to add to the C<sup>4</sup>C<sup>5</sup> double bond. In the presence of H<sub>2</sub>, this second step is intermolecular and catalytic. The cycle is completed by reaction with pyridine to yield Cp′<sub>2</sub>Ce­(2-pyridyl) and piperidine. The structures of Cp′<sub>2</sub>CeX, where X = 2-pyridyl, 4,5,6-trihydropyridyl, and piperidyl, are fluxional, as shown by variable-temperature <sup>1</sup>H NMR spectroscopy

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image

    Available Versions