Gold–Thiolate Ring as a Protecting Motif in the Au<sub>20</sub>(SR)<sub>16</sub> Nanocluster and Implications

Abstract

Understanding how gold nanoclusters nucleate from Au<sup>I</sup>SR complexes necessitates the structural elucidation of nanoclusters with decreasing size. Toward this effort, we herein report the crystal structure of an ultrasmall nanocluster formulated as Au<sub>20</sub>(TBBT)<sub>16</sub> (TBBT = SPh-<i>t</i>-Bu). The structure features a vertex-sharing bitetrahedral Au<sub>7</sub> kernel and an unprecedented “ring” motifAu<sub>8</sub>(SR)<sub>8</sub>. This large ring protects the Au<sub>7</sub> kernel through strong Au<sub>ring</sub>–Au<sub>kernel</sub> bonding but does not involve S–Au<sub>kernel</sub> bonding, in contrast to the common “staple” motifs in which the S–Au<sub>kernel</sub> bonding is dominant but the Au<sub>staple</sub>–Au<sub>kernel</sub> interaction is weak (i.e., aurophilic). As the smallest member in the TBBT “magic series”, Au<sub>20</sub>(TBBT)<sub>16</sub>, together with Au<sub>28</sub>(TBBT)<sub>20</sub>, Au<sub>36</sub>(TBBT)<sub>24</sub>, and Au<sub>44</sub>(TBBT)<sub>28</sub>, reveals remarkable size-growth patterns in both geometric structure and electronic nature. Moreover, Au<sub>20</sub>(TBBT)<sub>16</sub>, together with the Au<sub>24</sub>(SR)<sub>20</sub> and Au<sub>18</sub>(SR)<sub>14</sub> nanoclusters, forms a “4e” nanocluster family, which illustrates a trend of shrinkage of bitetrahedral kernels from Au<sub>8</sub><sup>4+</sup> to Au<sub>7</sub><sup>3+</sup> and possibly to Au<sub>6</sub><sup>2+</sup> with decreasing size

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image

    Available Versions