Revelation of Varying Bonding Motif of Alloxazine, a Flavin Analogue, in Selected Ruthenium(II/III) Frameworks

Abstract

The reaction of alloxazine (L) and Ru<sup>II</sup>(acac)<sub>2</sub>(CH<sub>3</sub>CN)<sub>2</sub> (acac<sup>–</sup> = acetylacetonate) in refluxing methanol leads to the simultaneous formation of Ru<sup>II</sup>(acac)<sub>2</sub>(L) (<b>1</b> = bluish-green) and Ru<sup>III</sup>(acac)<sub>2</sub>(L<sup>–</sup>) (<b>2</b> = red) encompassing a usual neutral α-iminoketo chelating form of L and an unprecedented monodeprotonated α-iminoenolato chelating form of L<sup>–</sup>, respectively. The crystal structure of <b>2</b> establishes that N5,O4<sup>–</sup> donors of L<sup>–</sup> result in a nearly planar five-membered chelate with the {Ru<sup>III</sup>(acac)<sub>2</sub><sup>+</sup>} metal fragment. The packing diagram of <b>2</b> further reveals its hydrogen-bonded dimeric form as well as π–π interactions between the nearly planar tricyclic rings of coordinated alloxazine ligands in nearby molecules. The paramagnetic <b>2</b> and one-electron-oxidized <b>1</b><sup>+</sup> display ruthenium­(III)-based anisotropic axial EPR in CH<sub>3</sub>CN at 77 K with ⟨<i>g</i>⟩/Δ<i>g</i> of 2.136/0.488 and 2.084/0.364, respectively (⟨<i>g</i>⟩ = {1/3­(<i>g</i><sub>1</sub><sup>2</sup> + <i>g</i><sub>2</sub><sup>2</sup> + <i>g</i><sub>3</sub><sup>2</sup>)}<sup>1/2</sup> and Δ<i>g</i> = <i>g</i><sub>1</sub> – <i>g</i><sub>3</sub>). The multiple electron-transfer processes of <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> in CH<sub>3</sub>CN have been analyzed by DFT-calculated MO compositions and Mulliken spin density distributions at the paramagnetic states, which suggest successive two-electron uptake by the π-system of the heterocyclic ring of L (L → L<sup>•–</sup> → L<sup>2–</sup>) or L<sup>–</sup> (L<sup>–</sup> → L<sup>•2–</sup> → L<sup>3–</sup>) besides metal-based (Ru<sup>II</sup>/Ru<sup>III</sup>) redox process. The origin of the ligand as well as mixed metal–ligand-based multiple electronic transitions of <b>1</b><sup><i>n</i></sup> (<i>n</i> = +1, 0, −1, −2) and <b>2</b><sup><i>n</i></sup> (<i>n</i> = 0, −1, −2) in the UV and visible regions, respectively, has been assessed by TD-DFT calculations in each redox state. The p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> values of <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> incorporating two and one NH protons of 6.5 (N3H, p<i>K</i><sub>a1</sub>)/8.16 (N1H, p<i>K</i><sub>a2</sub>) and 8.43 (N1H, p<i>K</i><sub>a1</sub>), respectively, are estimated by monitoring their spectral changes as a function of pH in CH<sub>3</sub>CN–H<sub>2</sub>O (1:1). <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> in CH<sub>3</sub>CN also participate in proton-driven internal reorganizations involving the coordinated alloxazine moiety, i.e., transformation of an α-iminoketo chelating form to an α-iminoenolato chelating form and the reverse process without any electron-transfer step: Ru<sup>II</sup>(acac)<sub>2</sub>(L) (<b>1</b>) → Ru<sup>II</sup>(acac)<sub>2</sub>(L<sup>–</sup>) (<b>2</b><sup>–</sup>) and Ru<sup>III</sup>(acac)<sub>2</sub>(L<sup>–</sup>) (<b>2</b>) → Ru<sup>III</sup>(acac)<sub>2</sub>(L) (<b>1</b><sup>+</sup>)

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image