Abstract

The X-ray structure of {C­(NH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>3</sub>}­[Tl­(dota)]·H<sub>2</sub>O shows that the Tl<sup>3+</sup> ion is deeply buried in the macrocyclic cavity of the dota<sup>4–</sup> ligand (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetate) with average Tl–N and Tl–O distances of 2.464 and 2.365 Å, respectively. The metal ion is directly coordinated to the eight donor atoms of the ligand, which results in a twisted square antiprismatic (TSAP′) coordination around Tl<sup>3+</sup>. A multinuclear <sup>1</sup>H, <sup>13</sup>C, and <sup>205</sup>Tl NMR study combined with DFT calculations confirmed the TSAP′ structure of the complex in aqueous solution, which exists as the Λ­(λλλλ)/Δ­(δδδδ) enantiomeric pair. <sup>205</sup>Tl NMR spectroscopy allowed the protonation constant associated with the protonation of the complex according to [Tl­(dota)]<sup>−</sup> + H<sup>+</sup> ⇆ [Tl­(Hdota)] to be determined, which turned out to be p<i>K</i><sup>H</sup><sub>Tl(dota)</sub> = 1.4 ± 0.1. [Tl­(dota)]<sup>−</sup> does not react with Br<sup>–</sup>, even when using an excess of the anion, but it forms a weak mixed complex with cyanide, [Tl­(dota)]<sup>−</sup> + CN<sup>–</sup> ⇆ [Tl­(dota)­(CN)]<sup>2–</sup>, with an equilibrium constant of <i>K</i><sub>mix</sub> = 6.0 ± 0.8. The dissociation of the [Tl­(dota)]<sup>−</sup> complex was determined by UV–vis spectrophotometry under acidic conditions using a large excess of Br<sup>–</sup>, and it was found to follow proton-assisted kinetics and to take place very slowly (∼10 days), even in 1 M HClO<sub>4</sub>, with the estimated half-life of the process being in the 10<sup>9</sup> h range at neutral pH. The solution dynamics of [Tl­(dota)]<sup>−</sup> were investigated using <sup>13</sup>C NMR spectroscopy and DFT calculations. The <sup>13</sup>C NMR spectra recorded at low temperature (272 K) point to <i>C</i><sub>4</sub> symmetry of the complex in solution, which averages to <i>C</i><sub>4<i>v</i></sub> as the temperature increases. This dynamic behavior was attributed to the Λ­(λλλλ) ↔ Δ­(δδδδ) enantiomerization process, which involves both the inversion of the macrocyclic unit and the rotation of the pendant arms. According to our calculations, the arm-rotation process limits the Λ­(λλλλ) ↔ Δ­(δδδδ) interconversion

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image

    Available Versions