Composition-Driven
Phase Boundary and Piezoelectricity in Potassium–Sodium Niobate-Based
Ceramics
- Publication date
- Publisher
Abstract
The
piezoelectricity of (K,Na)NbO<sub>3</sub> ceramics strongly depends
on the phase boundary types as well as the doped compositions. Here,
we systematically studied the relationships between the compositions
and phase boundary types in (K,Na) (Nb,Sb)O<sub>3</sub>–Bi<sub>0.5</sub>Na<sub>0.5</sub>AO<sub>3</sub> (KNNS-BNA, A = Hf, Zr, Ti,
Sn) ceramics; then their piezoelectricity can be readily modified.
Their phase boundary types are determined by the doped elements. A
rhombohedral-tetragonal (R–T) phase boundary can be driven
in the compositions range of 0.035 ≤ BNH ≤ 0.040 and
0.035 ≤ BNZ ≤ 0.045; an orthorhombic-tetragonal (O–T)
phase boundary is formed in the composition range of 0.005 ≤
BNT ≤ 0.02; and a pure O phase can be only observed regardless
of BNS content (≤0.01). In addition, the phase boundary types
strongly affect their corresponding piezoelectricities. A larger <i>d</i><sub>33</sub> (∼440–450 pC/N) and a higher <i>d</i><sub>33</sub>* (∼742–834 pm/V) can be attained
in KNNS-BNA (A = Zr and Hf) ceramics due to the involvement of R–T
phase boundary, and unfortunately KNNS-BNA (A = Sn and Ti) ceramics
possess a relatively poor piezoelectricity (<i>d</i><sub>33</sub> ≤ 200 and <i>d</i><sub>33</sub>* < 600
pm/V) due to the involvement of other phase structures (O–T
or O). In addition, the underlying physical mechanisms for the relationships
between piezoelectricity and phase boundary types were also discussed.
We believe that comprehensive research can design more excellent ceramic
systems concerning potassium–sodium niobate