Comparing different methods for recovering the CO<sub>2</sub> input.

Abstract

<p>CO<sub>2</sub> was infused with rectangular pulses with different frequency and duration into the respirometry chamber in two flow rates of 250 and 500 mL/min and the output was recorded (A). ZT, EZT, and GZT methods were used to recover the CO<sub>2</sub> inputs from the recorded data (B and C). The results indicate that the precision of GZT method is significantly higher than the ZT and EZT methods and the EZT is more precise than the ZT method.</p

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image

    Available Versions