Impact of Heavy Metals on Transcriptional and Physiological Activity of Nitrifying Bacteria

Abstract

Heavy metals can inhibit nitrification, a key process for nitrogen removal in wastewater treatment. The transcriptional responses of <i>amoA</i>, <i>hao</i>, <i>nirK</i>, and <i>norB</i> were measured in conjunction with specific oxygen uptake rate (sOUR) for nitrifying enrichment cultures exposed to different metals (Ni­(II), Zn­(II), Cd­(II), and Pb­(II)). There was significant decrease in sOUR with increasing concentrations for Ni­(II) (0.03–3 mg/L), Zn­(II) (0.1–10 mg/L), and Cd­(II) (0.03–1 mg/L) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, no considerable changes in sOUR were observed with Pb­(II) (1–100 mg/L), except at a dosage of 1000 mg/L causing 84% inhibition. Based on RT-qPCR data, the transcript levels of <i>amoA</i> and <i>hao</i> decreased when exposed to Ni­(II) dosages. Slight up-regulation of <i>amoA</i>, <i>hao</i>, and <i>nirK</i> (0.5–1.5-fold) occurred after exposure to 0.3–3 mg/L Zn­(II), although their expression decreased for 10 mg/L Zn­(II). With the exception of 1000 mg/L Pb­(II), stimulation of all genes occurred on Cd­(II) and Pb­(II) exposure. While overall the results show that RNA-based function-specific assays can be used as potential surrogates for measuring nitrification activity, the degree of inhibition inferred from sOUR and gene transcription is different. We suggest that variations in transcription of functional genes may supplement sOUR based assays as early warning indicators of upsets in nitrification

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image

    Available Versions