Formation of a <i>N</i><sup>2</sup>-dG:<i>N</i><sup>2</sup>-dG Carbinolamine DNA Cross-link by the <i>trans</i>-4-Hydroxynonenal-Derived (6<i>S</i>,8<i>R</i>,11<i>S</i>) 1,<i>N</i><sup>2</sup>-dG Adduct

Abstract

Michael addition of <i>trans</i>-4-hydroxynonenal (HNE) to deoxyguanosine yields diastereomeric 1,<i>N</i><sup>2</sup>-dG adducts in DNA. When placed opposite dC in the 5′-CpG-3′ sequence, the (6<i>S</i>,8<i>R</i>,11<i>S</i>) diastereomer forms a <i>N</i><sup>2</sup>-dG:<i>N</i><sup>2</sup>-dG interstrand cross-link [Wang, H.; Kozekov, I. D.; Harris, T. M.; Rizzo, C. J. <i>J. Am. Chem. Soc.</i> <b>2003</b>, <i>125</i>, 5687–5700]. We refined its structure in 5′-d(G<sup>1</sup>C<sup>2</sup>T<sup>3</sup>A<sup>4</sup>G<sup>5</sup>C<sup>6</sup><u>X</u><sup>7</sup>A<sup>8</sup>G<sup>9</sup>T<sup>10</sup>C<sup>11</sup>C<sup>12</sup>)-3′·5′-d(G<sup>13</sup>G<sup>14</sup>A<sup>15</sup>C<sup>16</sup>T<sup>17</sup>C<sup>18</sup><u>Y</u><sup>19</sup>C<sup>20</sup>T<sup>21</sup>A<sup>22</sup>G<sup>23</sup>C<sup>24</sup>)-3′ [X<sup>7</sup> is the dG adjacent to the C6 carbon of the cross-link or the α-carbon of the (6<i>S</i>,8<i>R</i>,11<i>S</i>) 1,<i>N</i><sup>2</sup>-dG adduct, and Y<sup>19</sup> is the dG adjacent to the C8 carbon of the cross-link or the γ-carbon of the HNE-derived (6<i>S</i>,8<i>R</i>,11<i>S</i>) 1,<i>N</i><sup>2</sup>-dG adduct; the cross-link is in the 5′-CpG-3′ sequence]. Introduction of <sup>13</sup>C at the C8 carbon of the cross-link revealed one <sup>13</sup>C8→H8 correlation, indicating that the cross-link existed predominantly as a carbinolamine linkage. The H8 proton exhibited NOEs to Y<sup>19</sup> H1′, C<sup>20</sup> H1′, and C<sup>20</sup> H4′, orienting it toward the complementary strand, consistent with the (6<i>S</i>,8<i>R</i>,11<i>S</i>) configuration. An NOE was also observed between the HNE H11 proton and Y<sup>19</sup> H1′, orienting the former toward the complementary strand. Imine and pyrimidopurinone linkages were excluded by observation of the Y<sup>19</sup> <i>N</i><sup>2</sup>H and X<sup>7</sup> N1H protons, respectively. A strong H8→H11 NOE and no <sup>3</sup><i>J</i>(<sup>13</sup>C→H) coupling for the <sup>13</sup>C8–O–C11–H11 eliminated the tetrahydrofuran species derived from the (6<i>S</i>,8<i>R</i>,11<i>S</i>) 1,<i>N</i><sup>2</sup>-dG adduct. The (6<i>S</i>,8<i>R</i>,11<i>S</i>) carbinolamine linkage and the HNE side chain were located in the minor groove. The X<sup>7</sup> <i>N</i><sup>2</sup> and Y<sup>19</sup> <i>N</i><sup>2</sup> atoms were in the gauche conformation with respect to the linkage, maintaining Watson–Crick hydrogen bonds at the cross-linked base pairs. A solvated molecular dynamics simulation indicated that the anti conformation of the hydroxyl group with respect to C6 of the tether minimized steric interaction and predicted hydrogen bonds involving O8H with C<sup>20</sup> <i>O</i><sup>2</sup> of the 5′-neighbor base pair G<sup>5</sup>·C<sup>20</sup> and O11H with C<sup>18</sup> <i>O</i><sup>2</sup> of X<sup>7</sup>·C<sup>18</sup>. These may, in part, explain the stability of this cross-link and the stereochemical preference for the (6<i>S</i>,8<i>R</i>,11<i>S</i>) configuration

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image

    Available Versions