Benneworth, P.

Benneworth, Paul Stephen

NARCIS 

Cut North free from meddling

University of Twente Research Information

Cut North free from meddling; Opinion.Byline: Paul Benneworth IT'S a golden rule of British politics: July is the ideal month to launch lightweight and insubstantial policies. Everyone is too busy looking forward to their well-earned holidays to give them proper scrutiny and criticism. So does that explain last week's announcement that the Government is giving Newcastle and five other cities substantial new powers to promote economic development? The national and local media response is best summed up as a resounding chorus of "nice, but so what?" when in a busier time there might have been more concerted and justified criticism of a rather oversold policy. There are big claims that this is a transformation, but the proposals are sketchy on where the transformation will come. Local authorities are working together creating new enterprise zones, will retain the business taxes paid by newly attracted businesses, and are to take over former regional development agency assets. In parallel, the Government will accelerate the widening of the A1 near the Metrocentre. So to try to work out what was the big picture behind the plans, I looked at the Government website for decentralisation. There's an intriguing section there called "what do we do". My eye was caught by a picture of a wheelie bin with the caption "Weekly bin collections". That was quite a revelation. I know the Government does a lot of things, but I didn't think any of them were arranging rubbish collections. Of course, what they mean is they heaped pressure on some local councils to revert to weekly bin rounds. That doesn't sound much like decentralisation to me, more like letting councils take the blame for bin collections while hogging the limelight with simplistic, populist plans. Populism is no substitute for good policymaking. Direct interventions about the frequency of bin rounds might give an unpopular government an attention-grabbing headline, but it gives local communities no incentives to think about the serious issues of reducing waste levels and increasing recycling. We can't even rely on civil servants to fight our corner in the face of political hostility in the coalition to serving our interests. Plans for regional public sector pay and benefit levels were both recently floated by sources close to government, and then unceremoniously shelved. But the fact that such flawed ideas could even be considered shows the deeply-ingrained antipathy to the northern regions at the heart of this Government. Perhaps we can give two cheers for these plans: they might being new investment and growth into Newcastle and help continue our cities' transformation. But I have to conclude that for all the talk of dramatic shifts and groundbreaking deals for decentralisation, northern cities will remain dancing to a tune being called elsewhere. Until someone has the political courage to grant our northern cities real freedom from Whitehall's micro-meddling, Newcastle will remain fighting for crumbs of attention at a feast dominated by London. Title Annotation: FeaturesDate: Jul 12, 2012Words: 498Publication: The Journal (Newcastle, England)ISSN: 0964-0576Page 1 of 2Cut North free from meddling; Opinion.9-7-2013http://www.thefreelibrary.com/_/print/PrintArticle.aspx?id=296074804Dr Paul Benneworth is a senior researcher at the Center for Higher Education Policy Studies, University of Twente, Netherlands COPYRIGHT 2012 MGN Ltd.Copyright 2012 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.Page 2 of 2Cut North free from meddling; Opinion.9-7-2013http://www.thefreelibrary.com/_/print/PrintArticle.aspx?id=296074804

English

http://doc.utwente.nl/83245/1/Benneworth12cut.pdf

Cut North free from meddling

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

NARCIS

University of Twente Research Information