Synthesis and Small Molecule Reactivity of <i>trans</i>-Dihydride Isomers of Ru(NHC)<sub>2</sub>(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>H<sub>2</sub> (NHC = N‑Heterocyclic Carbene)

Abstract

Addition of IMe<sub>4</sub> (1,3,4,5-tetra­methyl­imidazol-2-ylidene) to Ru­(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>­HCl (in the presence of H<sub>2</sub>) or Ru­(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>­H<sub>2</sub> gave the all-trans isomer of Ru­(IMe<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>­(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>­H<sub>2</sub> (<b>1a</b>), whereas 1,3-diethyl-4,5-dimethylimidazol-2-ylidene (IEt<sub>2</sub>­Me<sub>2</sub>) reacted with Ru­(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>­H<sub>2</sub> to form <i>cis</i>,<i>cis</i>,<i>trans</i>-Ru­(IEt<sub>2</sub>­Me<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>­(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>­H<sub>2</sub> (<b>2b</b>). H/D exchange of <b>1a</b> with C<sub>6</sub>D<sub>6</sub> (elevated temperature) or D<sub>2</sub> (room temperature) gave Ru­(IMe<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>­(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>­HD (<b>1a-HD</b>) and Ru­(IMe<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>­(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>­D<sub>2</sub> (<b>1a-D</b><sub><b>2</b></sub>). CO reacted with <b>1a</b> to give a mixture of Ru­(IMe<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>­(PPh<sub>3</sub>)­(CO)­H<sub>2</sub> (<b>3</b>) and Ru­(IMe<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>­(CO)<sub>3</sub> (<b>4</b>); <b>2b</b> reacted in a similar manner, although more slowly, allowing isolation of the monocarbonyl species Ru­(IEt<sub>2</sub>­Me<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>­(PPh<sub>3</sub>)­(CO)­H<sub>2</sub> (<b>5</b>). Insertion of CO<sub>2</sub> into one of the Ru–H bonds of <b>1a</b> and <b>2b</b> generated mixtures of major and minor isomers of the κ<sup>2</sup>-formate complexes Ru­(IMe<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>­(PPh<sub>3</sub>)­(OCHO)H (<b>7</b>/<b>8</b>) and Ru­(IEt<sub>2</sub>Me<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(PPh<sub>3</sub>)­(OCHO)H (<b>9</b>/<b>10</b>). The hydridic nature of <b>1a</b> and <b>2b</b> was apparent by their reactivity toward MeI, which gave [Ru­(IMe<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>­(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>­H]I (<b>11</b>), Ru­(IEt<sub>2</sub>­Me<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>­(PPh<sub>3</sub>)­HI (<b>12</b>), [Ru­(IEt<sub>2</sub>­Me<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>­(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>­H]I (<b>13</b>), and Ru­(IEt<sub>2</sub>­Me<sub>2</sub>)­(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>­HI (<b>14</b>). Complexes <b>1a</b>, <b>2b</b>, <b>5</b>, <b>9</b>, <b>11</b>, <b>13</b>, and <b>14</b> were structurally characterized

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image

    Available Versions