Projektna naloga obravnava območje tržnice Tabor v mestni četrti Nova vas. V prvem delu naloge je predstavljena mestna četrt Nova vas in njene spremembe skozi čas. Temu sledijo referenčni primeri in analiza obravnavanega območja z idejno zasnovo.
Predstavljena je idejna zasnova prenove tržnice z ureditvijo javnih odprtih površin, dostopov za napajanje programov in funkcionalno ovirane ter zasnova kavarne.The project deals with the area of the marketplace Tabor in the city district Nova vas. The first part of the project presents the city district Nova vas and its changes through time, then follow some examples and the analysis of the marketplace with its concept. 
The project also includes the concept of renovating the marketplace with the arrangements of open public spaces, access to the additional programs, a cafeteria and access for the disabled

Alison Kinengyere (4393846)

Arnold Mindra (4393843)

Celestino Obua (375449)

Dickens Akena (297025)

Edith Wakida (4393840)

Elialilia Okello (335753)

Ronald Kamoga (4393849)

Zohray Talib (4263031)

Systematic Reviews

Slovene

FigShare

Additional file 1: of Barriers and facilitators to the integration of mental health services into primary health care: a systematic review protocol

Abstract Background Mental health is an integral part of health and well-being and yet health systems have not adequately responded to the burden of mental disorders. Integrating mental health services into primary health care (PHC) is the most viable way of closing the treatment gap and ensuring that people get the mental health care they need. PHC was formally adapted by the World Health Organization (WHO), and they have since invested enormous amounts of resources across the globe to ensure that integration of mental health services into PHC works. Methods This review will use the SPIDER (Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, Research type) framework approach to identify experiences of mental health integration into PHC; the findings will be reported using the “Best fit” framework synthesis. PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials (CENTRAL) will be searched including other sources like the WHO website and OpenGrey database. Assessment of bias and quality will be done at study level using two separate tools to check for the quality of evidence presented. Data synthesis will take on two synergistic approaches (qualitative and quantitative studies). Synthesizing evidence from countries across the globe will provide useful insights into the experiences of integrating mental health services into PHC and how the barriers and challenges have been handled. The findings will be useful to a wide array of stakeholders involved in the implementation of the mental health integration into PHC. Discussion The SPIDER framework has been chosen for this review because of its suitable application to qualitative and mixed methods research and will be used as a guide when selecting articles for inclusion. Data extracted will be synthesized using the “Best fit” framework because it has been used before and proved its suitability in producing new conceptual models for explaining decision-making and possible behaviors. Synthesizing evidence from countries across the globe will provide useful insights into the experiences of integrating mental health services into PHC and how the barriers and challenges have been handled. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD4201605200

Edith K. Wakida

Dickens Akena

Elialilia S. Okello

Alison Kinengyere

Ronald Kamoga

Arnold Mindra

Celestino Obua

Zohray M. Talib

Directory of Open Access Journals

Barriers and facilitators to the integration of mental health services into primary health care: a systematic review protocol

Background Mental health is an integral part of health and well-being and yet health systems have not adequately responded to the burden of mental disorders. Integrating mental health services into primary health care (PHC) is the most viable way of closing the treatment gap and ensuring that people get the mental health care they need. PHC was formally adapted by the World Health Organization (WHO), and they have since invested enormous amounts of resources across the globe to ensure that integration of mental health services into PHC works.    Methods This review will use the SPIDER (Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, Research type) framework approach to identify experiences of mental health integration into PHC; the findings will be reported using the “Best fit” framework synthesis. PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials (CENTRAL) will be searched including other sources like the WHO website and OpenGrey database. Assessment of bias and quality will be done at study level using two separate tools to check for the quality of evidence presented.  Data synthesis will take on two synergistic approaches (qualitative and quantitative studies). Synthesizing evidence from countries across the globe will provide useful insights into the experiences of integrating mental health services into PHC and how the barriers and challenges have been handled. The findings will be useful to a wide array of stakeholders involved in the implementation of the mental health integration into PHC.    Discussion The SPIDER framework has been chosen for this review because of its suitable application to qualitative and mixed methods research and will be used as a guide when selecting articles for inclusion. Data extracted will be synthesized using the “Best fit” framework because it has been used before and proved its suitability in producing new conceptual models for explaining decision-making and possible behaviors. Synthesizing evidence from countries across the globe will provide useful insights into the experiences of integrating mental health services into PHC and how the barriers and challenges have been handled.    Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD4201605200

Wakida, Edith K

Akena, Dickens

Okello, Elialilia S

Kinengyere, Alison

Kamoga, Ronald

Mindra, Arnold

Obua, Celestino

Talib, Zohray M

George Washington University: Health Sciences Research Commons (HSRC)

English

Barriers and Facilitators to the Integration of Mental Health Services into Primary Health Care: A Systematic Review Protocol.

Additional file 2: of Barriers and facilitators to the integration of mental health services into primary health care: a systematic review

Risk of bias assessment. (DOCX 46âkb

Additional file 5: of Barriers and facilitators to the integration of mental health services into primary health care: a systematic review

Additional file 3: of Barriers and facilitators to the integration of mental health services into primary health care: a systematic review

Fajt, Maruša

Digital library of University of Maribor

Renovation of marketplace Tabor in Maribor

Abstract Background The objective of the review was to synthesize evidence of barriers and facilitators to the integration of mental health services into PHC from existing literature. The structure of the review was guided by the SPIDER framework which involves the following: Sample or population of interest—primary care providers (PCPs); Phenomenon of Interest—integration of mental health services into primary health care (PHC); Design—influenced robustness and analysis of the study; Evaluation—outcomes included subjective outcomes (views and attitudes); and Research type—qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies. Methods Studies that described mental health integration in PHC settings, involved primary care providers, and presented barriers/facilitators of mental health integration into PHC were included in the review. The sources of information included PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials, the WHO website, and OpenGrey. Assessment of bias and quality was done using two separate tools: the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) qualitative checklist and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. Results Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria out of the 3353 search results. The most frequently reported barriers to integration of mental health services into PHC were (i) attitudes regarding program acceptability, appropriateness, and credibility; (ii) knowledge and skills; (iii) motivation to change; (iv) management and/or leadership; and (v) financial resources. In order to come up with an actionable approach to addressing the barriers, these factors were further analyzed along a behavior change theory. Discussion We have shown that the integration of mental health services into PHC has been carried out by various countries. The analysis from this review provides evidence to inform policy on the existing barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the mental health integration policy option. Not all databases may have been exhausted. Systematic review registration PROSPERO 2016 (Registration Number: CRD42016052000) and published in BMC Systematic Reviews August 2017

Barriers and facilitators to the integration of mental health services into primary health care: a systematic review

Additional file 2: of Barriers and facilitators to the integration of mental health services into primary health care: a systematic review protocol

https://figshare.com/articles/Additional_file_1_of_Barriers_and_facilitators_to_the_integration_of_mental_health_services_into_primary_health_care_a_systematic_review_protocol/5349760

Renovation of marketplace Tabor in Maribor

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

FigShare

Directory of Open Access Journals

George Washington University: Health Sciences Research Commons (HSRC)

FigShare

FigShare

FigShare

Digital library of University of Maribor

Directory of Open Access Journals

FigShare