Sadeghi Khabaz, Mehdi

Simorgh Research Repository

Oti.,.f Lsjt4JJ ,;;l.tq.r i-ltnJ2 9 ,rs;i pf otS-.i.ilcJp ,sl;-il d"q.. *Sl;i o,r-L;ilc:+cU glr_trL*jljjgt gl, G,a^erd' LSI-;;i5J aq;c o.9b.,1; c,4->:olt.crL2q.l ;r .#J Jrls e!t.g)tA.{ S ,;l)* eYgjhdf .,"L*r jl +,*;-G*I .5j#*.rl; , CT Scan ),s..a*n-:j ,Sj:j1rt.1 iiLi.Liil pta*t cag .,"i.a*l.rT,1't$! ,r"tj.Uf + o.rii5 +r.*lp Ogrt' Jr (#tJ59i9.*,:Loi.ot-; JLL.,I,-! Lo ":9-r...o ;5o;9H-o Jh",rt.5J?Lef gt-*.>l;:5s'cittfi I uial!,;t"- ./.t- 6.r"q- ,;Jr1P ,L-rt'JJ .,.ll ,f-lc pVgrl-r* s C\;s- r"Yijl.r,* u:;. ;l a--G- 4JU- ;-l r.t-=.-;l ,l *:.s :d--j-:" (Gl.f yy s s)ly.;l;, CT Scan ).r-ais.sjl.r.Jl-, oLl.rll ,."E l ;47 ..--- ----.r;! .r. :-! .,-ljrfl a, o.r5 a,--\,- _: - -\Y t,9.: L=l if f fJ f .5,,- ASA a?-,Jtt -f ,>95 ?. .:1u' ,-1.- t)V* rs:ls "r;; t: -,L*r 1-''.,9,l: 1.9->; jl ._r-. J"l: -l;ijl sr.( ,l j "5,1":," ;,.; ;l=J^.c ;"-=; -r,-L ift- .r,.u: .5-r1 i"*i .1,; i_l;, -,"r L_ i J,J-o J-.-La, ;Jto -*- -- J ..r;:J 5 _rlf ,r-r, - -,l,s .s"-r +--rr r-s (.<j!-"1 C*.r:_,) nialc wiltoll .,J,0; r1 :si ,i-"1 ! ":r. .s r,: i- .! .-6;1r,i ,,,*i ;lJ-,c pL-.-;l ,1 d-J- , .r';tj.ii Ji. ,,tj J;'" ciol a: o*l*" .-,5",J .*,:*L,lr; 1;--.-.o , G;1J,1 ,,-,.; ,ri-J-"-c pt=.;i ;L, i,.r.. ;*;:5r[ ;1 ".- .r.;,-a- ;lr o-J;: _---;l il-G.gl.s osis.5rLl ,!--; pt=-;i ;-c.7 ,-*f );6-)1. r_r,*.S_rFgn aJ-- LGi )t :--.-rj c:lj:-,l .,ilr- .5rLl ..<-: _--cs-*,l-1,: ei9; -,J;L-*.-ir-* 9 9rl,: o'l'; 1*>J jrls )sJ,f..--:; rJj osLl ;L, :'rr:---.lPvalue < ./.A ) 19, i:+ -51;f Gs: )l.grlri-." J;:-- --, PO pYr;tr=" .,iir"l)i Jl., aq .-*; .lN eYljl+* (5*^=--l)l -f,:., oI=,-tdl 1l L.< -^s ..:-,l=""-r 3# ,-y-l))tl "i_ Jr:;S rr g rrl: lr 9rl.:;l'=", dLj e-ll .g-* {;- i ,.\'- _*_.-;sr9i ;*.r, sly. tt "F_l; -S,_ IN ,"Yijl."- -ig-, uJ .f l- i, Jf* :- :-elntroduction: The purpose of this study was to compare the eli-rc;; -oral r"nidazolam and intra nasal midazolam in sedation for diagr:,- -. -radiology (CT scan, radiology and ultrasonography) in children referrei .the emergency depafiment of Bahr.,.:.Materials and Methods: In this study, 60 children rvitir ASA grade r:..and two and children aged betr.r,een two and 12 years old u,ere selected ,,,:imaging. After the adrninistration of the drug, the patient's response \\...:assessed and according to the satisfaction status Mental or unsatisfactoi'1. -,reasonable level was categorized in each group r-lsing the nialc iviiton (fir.-point method). The children are then transferred to the desired section.,'-returned to the first section after perfoming the inlaging operations. Aii:returning tiie duration of the operation, the imaging and also the chi:-.conditions were studied in terms of level of consciousness. For analyzi:--the data obtained, various rnethods were used.Results: The tirne to prepare tlre plocedure, the close of the prescril-';:medication and the acceptance of the patient in the intranasal technir:.=were significantly higher than the oral rnethod (P value <0.05).. Conclusion: As the rnidazolam lN sedation method, compared to 'i: .midazolam PO sedation, has a higher acceptance and clear tirne and cir..-saving and is very helpful in controlling a busy emergency. It see.:',reasonable that the Midazolam IN method has a superior approach to =:children at a faster sedation in a crowded and crowded ED.

مقایسه اثر بخشی میدازولام خوراکی  و میدازولام داخل بینی  در ایجاد آرامبخشی جهت اقدامات رادیولوژی تشخیصی ( CT Scan  ، رادیولوژی و سونوگرافی  ) در کودکان مراجعه کننده به اورژانس باهنر

http://eprints.kmu.ac.ir/26816/2/6329.pdf

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Simorgh Research Repository