This thesis discuss the duties and authority of prosecutors in the field of civil and state administration (a case study in the High Court of West Kalimantan). The method used in this research using normative juridical approach. From the results of research using legal research methods normative juridical conclusion, that the duties and authority of the Prosecutor in the field of Civil and State Administrative High Court of West Kalimantan, the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia, which is a state agency that has the function to assure the rule of law, save the riches of the country , maintain the authority of the government, and protect the interests of the community to carry out these functions, the prosecutor of the Republic of Indonesia the field of civil and state administration is given the authority by law and discretionary of a power of attorney, the authority of the state prosecutor in the field of civil include legal assistance, law enforcement legal considerations, legal services, and other measures already run optimally in accordance with existing legislation. The prosecutor as the state attorney can run right an arbitrary there must be a special power, either the prosecutor\u27s proceedings in the district courts, commercial courts, religious courts and the Supreme Court although the way to beracaranya different but born out of the memorandum of understanding made by the parties beforehand. Obstacles encountered in functionalizing the Prosecutorial Authority in the field of Civil and State Administration is the constraint of the prosecutor\u27s own internal institutions that not all elements of the internal Attorney understand the existence, tasks and finagsi and Datun JAM organization, so that the function has not been implemented optimally Datun. JAM existence Datun turned out rnernerlukan human resources consisting of mental attitude as a prosecutor with the state attorney and have the educational background and knowledge of civil law and state administration. Constraints of external agencies ie prosecutor constraints in the legislation, the need for legislation that affirms the institution prosecutor as the state attorney\u27s office, the need for legislation requiring SOEs to use JPN services. The assertion of the Attorney Organization as an institution that can represent the public interest. Elimination of the provision which states obligation to provide specific authorization from the Government or state / local enterprises for JPN who will perform duties and authority in the field of Civil and State Administration. Cultural constraints not all institutions / government agencies recognize the role of the prosecutor as the state attorney. To overcome the problem that not all agencies / government agencies recognize the role of the prosecutor\u27s. The state attorney, the prosecutor has done correctional function datum of the concerns of institutions / agencies to submit a special power to kejaksaan.Lembaga / Government Agencies worried about the AGO will open weakness Institutions / Agencies concerned, the clan will be used to ensnare them in the criminal field, so they are not willing to give Power of Attorney to the Attorney
