In Web search, entity-seeking queries often trigger a special Question
Answering (QA) system. It may use a parser to interpret the question to a
structured query, execute that on a knowledge graph (KG), and return direct
entity responses. QA systems based on precise parsing tend to be brittle: minor
syntax variations may dramatically change the response. Moreover, KG coverage
is patchy. At the other extreme, a large corpus may provide broader coverage,
but in an unstructured, unreliable form. We present AQQUCN, a QA system that
gracefully combines KG and corpus evidence. AQQUCN accepts a broad spectrum of
query syntax, between well-formed questions to short `telegraphic' keyword
sequences. In the face of inherent query ambiguities, AQQUCN aggregates signals
from KGs and large corpora to directly rank KG entities, rather than commit to
one semantic interpretation of the query. AQQUCN models the ideal
interpretation as an unobservable or latent variable. Interpretations and
candidate entity responses are scored as pairs, by combining signals from
multiple convolutional networks that operate collectively on the query, KG and
corpus. On four public query workloads, amounting to over 8,000 queries with
diverse query syntax, we see 5--16% absolute improvement in mean average
precision (MAP), compared to the entity ranking performance of recent systems.
Our system is also competitive at entity set retrieval, almost doubling F1
scores for challenging short queries.Comment: Accepted to Information Retrieval Journa
