Q1Q1Background
The unprecedented public health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has motivated a rapid
search for potential therapeutics, with some key successes. However, the potential impact of
different treatments, and consequently research and procurement priorities, have not been clear.
Methods and Findings
develop a mathematical model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, COVID-19 disease and
clinical care to explore the potential public-health impact of a range of different potential
therapeutics, under a range of different scenarios varying: i) healthcare capacity, ii) epidemic
trajectories; and iii) drug efficacy in the absence of supportive care. In each case, the outcome
of interest was the number of COVID-19 deaths averted in scenarios with the therapeutic
compared to scenarios without. We find the impact of drugs like dexamethasone (which are
delivered to the most critically-ill in hospital and whose therapeutic benefit is expected to
depend on the availability of supportive care such as oxygen and mechanical ventilation) is
likely to be limited in settings where healthcare capacity is lowest or where uncontrolled
epidemics result in hospitals being overwhelmed. As such, it may avert 22% of deaths in highincome countries but only 8% in low-income countries (assuming R=1.35). Therapeutics for
different patient populations (those not in hospital, early in the course of infection) and types
of benefit (reducing disease severity or infectiousness, preventing hospitalisation) could have
much greater benefits, particularly in resource-poor settings facing large epidemics.
Conclusions
There is a global asymmetry in who is likely to benefit from advances in the treatment of
COVID-19 to date, which have been focussed on hospitalised-patients and predicated on an
assumption of adequate access to supportive care. Therapeutics that can feasibly be delivered
to those earlier in the course of infection that reduce the need for healthcare or reduce
infectiousness could have significant impact, and research into their efficacy and means of
delivery should be a priorityRevista Internacional - Indexad