Hyalophora columbia (Smith) has been collected in 12 Wisconsin counties, primarily in the north-central region. The adult flight season peaks during the second week of June. Hyalophora cecropia (L.) was found to occur in many of the columbia localities, and to be active at the same time as columbia. Despite this overlap, natural hybrids were very rarely seen

Ferge, Leslie A

English

Valparaiso University

The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 16 Number 3 - Fall 1983 Number 3 - Fall 1983 Article 1 October 1983 Distribution and Hybridization of Hyalophora Columbia (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) in Wisconsin Leslie A. Ferge Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Ferge, Leslie A. 1983. "Distribution and Hybridization of Hyalophora Columbia (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) in Wisconsin," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 16 (3) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol16/iss3/1 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at scholar@valpo.edu. 1983 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 67 DISTRIBUTION AND HYBRIDIZATION OF HYALOPHORA COLUMBIA (LEPIDOPTERA: SATURNIIDAE) IN WISCONSIN Leslie A. Ferge1 ABSTRACT llyalophora columbia (Smith) has been collected in 12 Wisconsin counties, primarily in the north-central region. The adult flight season peaks during the second week of June. llyalophora cecropia (L.) was found to occur in many of the columbia localities, and to be active at the same time as columbia. Despite this overlap, natural hybrids were very rarely seen. The columbia silkmoth, llyalophora columbia (Smith), is unique among the Sat­urniidae due to its Canadian Zone distribution and its presumed dependence on a single larval host, the eastern larch or tamarack, Larix laridna (Du Roi) K. Koch (Ferguson 1972). Existing distributional data (Sweadner 1937, McGugan 1958, Collins and Weast 1961, Ferguson 1972, Kohalmi and Moens 1975) indicate that columbia occurs in a rather narrow band extending from Nova Scotia through Ontario to eastern Manitoba, ranging southward in boggy areas of Maine, Michigan, and Wisconsin. New distributional data obtained in Wisconsin since 1975 are presented here, along with records f adult t1ight activity, previously not available since relatively few specimens have been collected as adults (Ferguson 1972). Historically, c lumbia may have been known from Wisconsin for at least 80 years. Holland (1903) briefly noted that the moth ranged from Maine to Wisconsin. The source of his information remains unknown, as do any specimens he may have seen. The Lincoln, Ozaukee, and Vilas County records cited by Collins and Weast (1961) and repeated by Ferguson (1972) were provided by the late William E. Sieker (W. E. Sieker, pers. comm.). Holdings of the Milwaukee Public Museum include one male from Eagle River, Vilas County, and five males from the Cedarburg Swamp, Ozaukee County. More recently, larvae of columbia were found on larch in a Douglas County bog by Mike Wagner (1. M. Scriber, pers. comm.). MATERIALS AND METHODS The survey technique utilized the interspecific attractancy of the genus llyalophora noted by Sweadner (1937) and subsequent workers. Virgin cecropia females were placed in specially designed moth traps and set out in tamarack bog habitats to attract columbia males. Two or sometimes three females were placed in each trap, and the traps were set out for one- or two-night intervals. The traps were usually placed near the edges of the bogs, such that the prevailing winds would carry the attractant pheromone into the bogs. Two types of moth trap have been used successfully. A box trap following the design of Collins and Weast (1961) was used initially in this survey. It consisted of a screened cage with an inward-slanting trough-like top made of clear plastic sheeting. A 16-mm horizontal slot between the top pieces allowed the male moths to enter. A less expensive, simplified version of the trap used by Collins (1973) was used extensively in the later course of this survey. The funnel in later versions was made from 203-mm diameter white i7119 Hubbard Avenue, Middleton, WI 53562. 1Ferge: Distribution and Hybridization of Hyalophora Columbia (LepPublished by ValpoScholar, 198368 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 16, No.3 polyethylene funnels, from which the tips were cut off to leave a 76-mm diameter hole inthe bottom. A cylinder of nylon netting was fastened to the top rim of the funnel and tied shut at its bottom. The traps were hung from tree limbs approximately 1.8 m above the ground, using a string attached to the rim of the funnel. The female moths were simply placed inside the net bag without further confinement, unlike the Collins trap in which the females were suspended above the funnel in a small cage. This limited the catch of males in most instances; occasionally larger numbers of males were attracted. In one instance, seven columbia males were caught in a single trap containing two cecropia females. No female cecropia escaped from these traps; they usually rested quietly underneath the top edge of the funnel. RESULTS Hyalophora columbia has been found in eight additional Wisconsin counties, and is presently known from 18 localities n 12 counties, predominantly in the north-central region. (Fig. 1) The pitted glacial outwash topography distinguishes this area from other parts of Wisconsin, as it is peppered with numerous lakes and potholes, favoring the development of numerous and often very large tamarack bogs. The large number, close proximity, and often great size of hese bogs undoubtedly permit columbia to e found more frequently here than elsewhere in the northern half of Wisconsin. It is of interest that the subarctic Satyrid butterfly Oeneis jutta ascerta Masters and Sorensen (the jutta arctic) ranges further southward than columbia, occurring in bogs surveyed in Monroe and Wood counties. These areas are among the southernmost remnants of the Canadian Zone in Wisconsin. Abundant stands of tamarack exist there, as welI as in isolated pockets in the southeastern section f the state, indicating that the range of columbia is not limited by the foodplant. The emergence of columbia has been recorded as early as 17 May (1977), and its latest date of capture is 30 June (1948). The peak flight occurs during the second week of June in most years; the majority of captures have been made between 5 and 17 Ju e. The May record given above is most unusual. The spring of 1977 was abnormally hot, causing many other species of Lepidoptera to emerge up to three weeks before normal. Data obtained in 1982 indicate the flight s ason extends up to 23 days; the dates ranging from 5 to 28 June. The first emergence of two common northern Sphingidae, Sphinx poecila (Stephens) and the big poplar sphinx, Pachysphinx modesta (Harris), may be used as an indicator of the onset of the columbia flight period. The survey results indicate that both columbia and cecropia adults occur together in the same localities and at the same time. Data from the Oneida County locality, which has been surveyed fairly regularly for tive consecutive years, indicate that cecropia emerges as much as two weeks before columbia. Although the two species often occur together, natural hybrids are apparently very rare. The occurrence of hybrids in zones of contact or overlap was discussed by Sweadner (1937), Collins and Weast (1961), and Ferguson (1972). The predominant characteristic of a columbia-cecropia hybrid is the presence of any red scaling beyond the white postmedian line on the upper surfaces of the wings. Pure columbia stock has no red scaling in that area, while cecropia often has a very striking solid red band. Hybrids reared in 1977 were intermediate to the parent species in size and appearance, with variation in red scaling ranging from a thin, well-defined line to a wide area of diffuse, scattered red scales, as seen in Figure 2, bottom row. Nearly all of the 45 specimens of columbia examined appeared to be typical in pattern and coloration, as shown in Figure 2, top row. A few specimens from Vilas, Oneida, and Price counties are unusual in that the discal spot of the forewing is obsolete. Two of these appear in Figure 2, middle row. Only two specimens appeared to be of hybrid origin. The most striking of these is in the Milwaukee Public Museum, collected in the Cedarburg Swamp on 29 June 1935. This specimen has a thin but strong red band beyond the postmedian line on both the forewings and hindwings, indicating that it is very likely an FI hybrid. Another specimen, taken in Iron County on 14 June 1980, appears much like typical columbia, except for being a bit larger than usual and exhibiting diffuse red scaling postmedially. Its appearance suggests that it is a numberof generations removed from its cecropia ancestry. 2The Great Lakes Entomologist, Vol. 16, No. 3 [1983], Art. 1https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol16/iss3/11983 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 69 • HYALOPHORA COLUMBIA A HYALOPHORA CECROPIA • Fig. I. Distribution of H. columbia and H. cecropia in Wisconsin. The low incidence of natural hybrids indicates that some type of isolating mechanism is at work, but its nature remains unclear and speculative. The time of attraction and mating is reported to be the same in both species (Sweadner 1937, Collins and Weast 1961). Observations made in Oneida County in 1977 indicate that columbia males are attracted to cecropia females (and to ultraviolet collecting lights) in the hours just before sunrise, between 300 and 500 hrs, the same time period given in the literature for cec opia. Possibly attraction and mating occur at an unusual time in native northern Wisconsin cecropia, as observed on 3 June 1972, when five cecropia males were attracted to caged cecropia females from dusk to 2230 hrs in a boggy area in Tomahawk Township, Lincoln County. H. columbia females may have a greater low-temperature tolerance than cecropia females, allowing them to remain active in cold bog habitats too severe for cecropia. This variation in cold tolerance has been observed at 2000 m in the Rockies, where Hyalophora gloveri (Strecker) females remained active and mated, while midwestern cecropia females were immobilized by the cold (Michael M. Collins, pers. comm.). 3Ferge: Distribution and Hybridization of Hyalophora Columbia (LepPublished by ValpoScholar, 198370 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 16, No. 3 Fig. 2. Typical Wisconsin Hyalophora columbia (top), H. columbia with obsolete discal spot (middle), reared H. columbia-cecropia hybrids (bottom). The evidence accumulated indicates that columbia should occur in many tamarack bogs in the northern third of Wisconsin, and that its populations remain quite viable in this area. The low number of previous records reflects a lack of collecting in the region, rather than actual rarity. Thc species has likely been little affected there by human activities or larch sawfly outbreaks. H. columbia has not been reported from the Cedarburg Swamp, its southernmost state locality, since 1935, and possibly may no longer occur there due to urban encroachment adversely affecting the remaining protected area. It is hoped this paper will encourage others to look for columbia in neighboring states, and to continue studying the species, to gain a better understanding of its isolating mechanisms and ecological needs. 4The Great Lakes Entomologist, Vol. 16, No. 3 [1983], Art. 1https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol16/iss3/11983 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 71 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 1 wish to thank Dr. Allen M. Young and Susan S. Borkin of the Milwaukee Public Museum for their assistance while visiting the museum; James C. Parkinson, Kingsford, Michigan, for providing data from three years of field work in northeastern Wisconsin; and Dave Robacker, Madison, Wisconsin, for additional data. I m grateful to Dr. Michael M. Collins and Mogens C. Nielsen for their helpful suggestions in reviewing the manuscript. LITERATURE CITED Collins, Michael M. 1973. Notes on the taxonomic status of Hyalophora columbia (Saturniidae). J. Lepid. Soc. 27:225-235. Collins, Michael M. and RolJert D. Weast. 1961. Wild silk moths of the United States. Collins Radio Corp. Cedar Rapids, Iowa. 138 p. Ferguson, D. C. 1972. in Dominick, R. B. et al. The moths of America north of Mexico. fasc. 20.2 Bombycoidea (Saturniidae). Holland, W. J. 1903. The moth book. Doubleday, Page & Co. New York. 479 p. Kohalmi, Lester and Peter Moens. 1975. Evidence for the existence of an intergrade population between Hyaiophora gloveri nokomis and H. columbia in northwestern Ontario (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae). Canadian Entomol. 107:793-799. McGugan, B. M. (compiler). 1958. Forest Lepidoptera of Canada recorded by the forest insect survey. 1. Papilionidae to Arctiidae. Forest Biol. Div. Canadian Dept. Agric. Pub!. 1034. 76 p. Sweadner, W. R. 1937. Hybridization and the phylogeny of the genus Platysamia. Ann. Carnegie Mus. 25:163-242. 5Ferge: Distribution and Hybridization of Hyalophora Columbia (LepPublished by ValpoScholar, 1983

Distribution and Hybridization of \u3ci\u3eHyalophora Columbia\u3c/i\u3e (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) in Wisconsin

ValpoScholar

The Great Lakes Entomologist 
Volume 16 
Number 3 - Fall 1983 Number 3 - Fall 1983 Article 1 
October 1983 
Distribution and Hybridization of Hyalophora Columbia 
(Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) in Wisconsin 
Leslie A. Ferge 
Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle 
 Part of the Entomology Commons 
Recommended Citation 
Ferge, Leslie A. 1983. "Distribution and Hybridization of Hyalophora Columbia (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) 
in Wisconsin," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 16 (3) 
Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol16/iss3/1 
This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. 
It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. 
For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at scholar@valpo.edu. 
1983 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 67 
DISTRIBUTION AND HYBRIDIZATION OF HYALOPHORA 

COLUMBIA (LEPIDOPTERA: SATURNIIDAE) 

IN 
WISCONSIN 
Leslie A. Ferge1 
ABSTRACT 
llyalophora columbia (Smith) has been collected in 12 Wisconsin counties, primarily 
in the north-central region. The adult flight season peaks during the second week of June. 
llyalophora cecropia (L.) was found to occur in many of the columbia localities, and to 
be active at the same time as columbia. Despite this overlap, natural hybrids were very 
rarely seen. 
The columbia silkmoth, llyalophora columbia (Smith), is unique among the Sat­
urniidae due to its Canadian Zone distribution and its presumed dependence on a single 
larval host, the eastern larch or tamarack, Larix laridna (Du Roi) K. Koch (Ferguson 
1972). Existing distributional data (Sweadner 1937, McGugan 1958, Collins and Weast 
1961, Ferguson 1972, Kohalmi and Moens 1975) indicate that columbia occurs in a rather 
narrow band extending from Nova Scotia through Ontario to eastern Manitoba, ranging 
southward in boggy areas of Maine, Michigan, and Wisconsin. New distributional data 
obtained in Wisconsin since 1975 are presented here, along with records f adult t1ight 
activity, previously not available since relatively few specimens have been collected as 
adults (Ferguson 1972). 
Historically, c lumbia may have been known from Wisconsin for at least 80 years. 
Holland (1903) briefly noted that the moth ranged from Maine to Wisconsin. The source 
of 
his information remains unknown, 
as do any specimens he may have seen. The 
Lincoln, Ozaukee, and Vilas County records cited by Collins and Weast (1961) and 
repeated by Ferguson (1972) were provided by the late William E. Sieker (W. E. Sieker, 
pers. comm.). Holdings of the Milwaukee Public Museum include one male from Eagle 
River, Vilas County, and five males from the Cedarburg Swamp, Ozaukee County. More 
recently, larvae of columbia were found on larch in a Douglas County bog by Mike 
Wagner (1. M. Scriber, pers. comm.). 
MATERIALS AND METHODS 
The survey technique utilized the interspecific attractancy of the genus llyalophora 
noted by Sweadner (1937) and subsequent workers. Virgin cecropia females were placed 
in specially designed moth traps and set out in tamarack bog habitats to attract columbia 
males. Two or sometimes three females were placed in each trap, and the traps were set 
out for one- or two-night intervals. The traps were usually placed near the edges of the 
bogs, such that the prevailing winds would carry the attractant pheromone into the bogs. 
Two types of moth trap have been used successfully. A box trap following the design of 
Collins and Weast (1961) was used initially in this survey. It consisted of a screened cage 
with an inward-slanting trough-like top made of clear plastic sheeting. A 16-mm 
horizontal slot between the top pieces allowed the male moths to enter. A less expensive, 
simplified version of the trap used by Collins (1973) was used extensively in the later 
course of this survey. The funnel in later versions was made from 203-mm diameter white 
i7119 Hubbard Avenue, Middleton, WI 53562. 
1
Ferge: Distribution and Hybridization of Hyalophora Columbia (Lep
Published by ValpoScholar, 1983
68 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 16, No.3 
polyethylene funnels, from which the tips were cut off to leave a 76-mm diameter hole in
the bottom. A cylinder of nylon netting was fastened to the top rim of the funnel and tied 
shut at its bottom. The traps were hung from tree limbs approximately 1.8 m above the 
ground, using a string attached to the rim of the funnel. The female moths were simply 
placed inside the net bag without further confinement, unlike the Collins trap in which the 
females were suspended above the funnel in a small cage. This limited the catch of males 
in 
most instances; occasionally larger numbers 
of males were attracted. In one instance, 
seven columbia males were caught in a single trap containing two cecropia females. No 
female cecropia escaped from these traps; they usually rested quietly underneath the top 
edge of the funnel. 
RESULTS 
Hyalophora columbia has been found in eight additional Wisconsin counties, and is 
presently known from 18 localities n 12 counties, predominantly in the north-central 
region. (Fig. 1) The pitted glacial outwash topography distinguishes this area from other 
parts of Wisconsin, as it is peppered with numerous lakes and potholes, favoring the 
development of numerous and often very large tamarack bogs. The large number, close 
proximity, and often great size of hese bogs undoubtedly permit columbia to e found 
more frequently here than elsewhere in the northern half of Wisconsin. It is of interest that 
the subarctic Satyrid butterfly Oeneis jutta ascerta Masters and Sorensen (the jutta arctic) 
ranges further southward than columbia, occurring in bogs surveyed in Monroe and Wood 
counties. These areas are among the southernmost remnants of the Canadian Zone in 
Wisconsin. Abundant stands of tamarack exist there, as welI as in isolated pockets in the 
southeastern section f the state, indicating that the range of columbia is not limited by the 
foodplant. 
The emergence of columbia has been recorded as early as 17 May (1977), and its latest 
date of capture is 30 June (1948). The peak flight occurs during the second week of June 
in 
most years; the majority 
of captures have been made between 5 and 17 Ju e. The May 
record given above is most unusual. The spring of 1977 was abnormally hot, causing 
many other species of Lepidoptera to emerge up to three weeks before normal. Data 
obtained in 1982 indicate the flight s ason extends up to 23 days; the dates ranging from 5 
to 28 June. The first emergence of two common northern Sphingidae, Sphinx poecila 
(Stephens) and the big poplar sphinx, Pachysphinx modesta (Harris), may be used as an 
indicator of the onset of the columbia flight period. 
The survey results indicate that both columbia and cecropia adults occur together in the 
same localities and at the same time. Data from the Oneida County locality, which has 
been surveyed fairly regularly for tive consecutive years, indicate that cecropia emerges 
as much as two weeks before columbia. Although the two species often occur together, 
natural hybrids are apparently very rare. The occurrence of hybrids in zones of contact or 
overlap was discussed by Sweadner (1937), Collins and Weast (1961), and Ferguson 
(1972). The predominant characteristic of a columbia-cecropia hybrid is the presence of 
any red scaling beyond the white postmedian line on the upper surfaces of the wings. Pure 
columbia stock has no red scaling in that area, while cecropia often has a very striking 
solid red band. Hybrids reared in 1977 were intermediate to the parent species in size and 
appearance, with variation in red scaling ranging from a thin, well-defined line to a wide 
area of diffuse, scattered red scales, as seen in Figure 2, bottom row. 
Nearly all of the 45 specimens of columbia examined appeared to be typical in pattern 
and coloration, as shown in Figure 2, top row. A few specimens from Vilas, Oneida, and 
Price counties are unusual in that the discal spot of the forewing is obsolete. Two of these 
appear in Figure 2, middle row. Only two specimens appeared to be of hybrid origin. The 
most striking of these is in the Milwaukee Public Museum, collected in the Cedarburg 
Swamp on 29 June 1935. This specimen has a thin but strong red band beyond the 
postmedian line on both the forewings and hindwings, indicating that it is very likely an 
FI 
hybrid. Another specimen, taken 
in Iron County on 14 June 1980, appears much like 
typical columbia, except for being a bit larger than usual and exhibiting diffuse red scaling 
postmedially. Its appearance suggests that it is a numberof generations removed from its 
cecropia ancestry. 
2
The Great Lakes Entomologist, Vol. 16, No. 3 [1983], Art. 1
https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol16/iss3/1
1983 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 69 
• HYALOPHORA COLUMBIA 
A HYALOPHORA CECROPIA 
• 
Fig. I. Distribution of H. columbia and H. cecropia in Wisconsin. 
The low incidence of natural hybrids indicates that some type of isolating mechanism is 
at work, but its nature remains unclear and speculative. The time of attraction and mating 
is 
reported 
to be the same in both species (Sweadner 1937, Collins and Weast 1961). 
Observations made in Oneida County in 1977 indicate that columbia males are attracted to 
cecropia females (and to ultraviolet collecting lights) in the hours just before sunrise, 
between 300 and 500 hrs, the same time period given in the literature for cec opia. 
Possibly attraction and mating occur at an unusual time in native northern Wisconsin 
cecropia, as observed on 3 June 1972, when five cecropia males were attracted to caged 
cecropia females from dusk to 2230 hrs in a boggy area in Tomahawk Township, Lincoln 
County. H. columbia females may have a greater low-temperature tolerance than cecropia 
females, allowing them to remain active in cold bog habitats too severe for cecropia. This 
variation in cold tolerance has been observed at 2000 m in the Rockies, where 
Hyalophora gloveri (Strecker) females remained active and mated, while midwestern 
cecropia females were immobilized by the cold (Michael M. Collins, pers. comm.). 
3
Ferge: Distribution and Hybridization of Hyalophora Columbia (Lep
Published by ValpoScholar, 1983
70 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 16, No. 3 
Fig. 2. Typical Wisconsin Hyalophora columbia (top), H. columbia with obsolete discal spot 
(middle), reared H. columbia-cecropia hybrids (bottom). 
The evidence accumulated indicates that columbia should occur in many tamarack bogs 
in 
the northern third 
of Wisconsin, and that its populations remain quite viable in this area. 
The low number of previous records reflects a lack of collecting in the region, rather than 
actual rarity. Thc species has likely been little affected there by human activities or larch 
sawfly outbreaks. H. columbia has not been reported from the Cedarburg Swamp, its 
southernmost state locality, since 1935, and possibly may no longer occur there due to 
urban encroachment adversely affecting the remaining protected area. It is hoped this 
paper will encourage others to look for columbia in neighboring states, and to continue 
studying the species, to gain a better understanding of its isolating mechanisms and 
ecological needs. 
4
The Great Lakes Entomologist, Vol. 16, No. 3 [1983], Art. 1
https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol16/iss3/1
1983 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 71 
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 
1 wish to thank Dr. Allen M. Young and Susan S. Borkin of the Milwaukee Public 
Museum for their assistance while visiting the museum; James C. Parkinson, Kingsford, 
Michigan, for providing data from three years of field work in northeastern Wisconsin; 
and Dave Robacker, Madison, Wisconsin, for additional data. I m grateful to Dr. 
Michael M. Collins and Mogens C. Nielsen for their helpful suggestions in reviewing the 
manuscript. 
LITERATURE CITED 
Collins, Michael M. 1973. Notes on the taxonomic status of Hyalophora columbia 
(Saturniidae). J. Lepid. Soc. 27:225-235. 
Collins, Michael M. and RolJert D. Weast. 1961. Wild silk moths of the United States. 
Collins Radio Corp. Cedar Rapids, Iowa. 138 p. 
Ferguson, D. C. 1972. in Dominick, R. B. et al. The moths of America north of Mexico. 
fasc. 20.2 Bombycoidea (Saturniidae). 
Holland, W. J. 1903. The moth book. Doubleday, Page & Co. New York. 479 p. 
Kohalmi, Lester and Peter Moens. 1975. Evidence for the existence of an intergrade 
population between Hyaiophora gloveri nokomis and H. columbia in northwestern 
Ontario (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae). Canadian Entomol. 107:793-799. 
McGugan, B. M. (compiler). 1958. Forest Lepidoptera of Canada recorded by the forest 
insect survey. 1. Papilionidae to Arctiidae. Forest Biol. Div. Canadian Dept. Agric. 
Pub!. 1034. 76 p. 
Sweadner, W. R. 1937. Hybridization and the phylogeny of the genus Platysamia. Ann. 
Carnegie Mus. 25:163-242. 
5
Ferge: Distribution and Hybridization of Hyalophora Columbia (Lep
Published by ValpoScholar, 1983

https://scholar.valpo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1465&amp;context=tgle

Distribution and Hybridization of \u3ci\u3eHyalophora Columbia\u3c/i\u3e (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) in Wisconsin

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Valparaiso University

ValpoScholar