Barnicot, Ranald A

English

ScholarWorks at WMU

Transference 
Volume 5 
Issue 1 | Fall 2017 Article 14 
2017 
To Fabullus (Invitation) by Catullus 
Ranald A. Barnicot 
Barnet and Southgate College, London, ranaldb3@hotmail.com 
Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/transference 
 Part of the Classical Literature and Philology Commons, Comparative Literature Commons, East Asian 
Languages and Societies Commons, European Languages and Societies Commons, French and 
Francophone Language and Literature Commons, German Language and Literature Commons, 
International and Area Studies Commons, Language Interpretation and Translation Commons, Linguistics 
Commons, Modern Languages Commons, Modern Literature Commons, Near Eastern Languages and 
Societies Commons, Poetry Commons, and the Reading and Language Commons 
Recommended Citation 
Barnicot, Ranald A. (2017) "To Fabullus (Invitation) by Catullus," Transference: Vol. 5: Iss. 1, Article 14. 
Available at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/transference/vol5/iss1/14 
68     Transference
Ranald Barnicot Gaius Valerius Catullus
To Fabullus (Invitation) XIII
Fabullus, you’ll dine well within a
Week chez moi, gods willing,
But make sure you bring a dinner
Ample, tasty, filling.
Also you’ll need to contribute
Laughs (the lot!), salt wit and wine,
A girl – mind! – radiantly cute.
Bring these, my charmer, and you’ll dine
Well, I say, because yours truly
Has a purse that’s cobweb-packed,
But you’ll be requited duly:
Pure love’s my part in this compact,
Or what’s even more becoming:
For I’ll present you with a perfume
Of a power suave and cunning,
My sweet girl’s gift from love-gods, whom
(Venuses, Cupids, such as those)
You’ll petition to metamorphose
You into nothing else but nose.
fall 2017     69
Commentary
According to St Jerome (mid fourth century to early fifth cen-
tury CE) Gaius Valerius Catullus was born in Verona in 87 BCE 
and died at the age of 30 in 58–7 BCE. However, given internal 
evidence in the poems, this end-date cannot be right, so many 
scholars have brought the birth-year forward by three years and 
made it 84 BCE. At any rate, it is the tradition that Catullus 
died as a relatively young man. His father appears to have been 
on friendly terms with Julius Caesar, whom, however, Catullus 
was to lampoon in a number of poems, together with Pompey 
and their associates. Plutarch tells us that they were reconciled 
just before Catullus’s death, and this is borne out by Catullus’s 
reference to Caesar’s conquests in Poem XI.
Catullus was a poet of great wit, power and range (both 
in theme and in meter). He wrote poems celebrating friendship, 
mourning his brother, attacking enemies quite viciously and 
scabrously, recounting Greek legends and expressing his love, 
at first tender, later bitter and tormented, for his faithless lover, 
Lesbia, who was probably—though this also is disputed—Clodia 
Metelli, the wife and later widow of the soldier and politician 
Metellus Celer.
Poem XIII is both an expression of warm, relaxed, light-
hearted affection for a friend, and also, it seems, a love-poem to 
Lesbia, who is not mentioned by name. Another attractive fea-
ture is the poet’s ability to laugh at himself (whether we should 
accept his protestations of penury at face value has been debat-
ed). The verse is also elegant and with its several slick elisions 
—the slurring of final syllables of words that end with a vowel 
or an –m before a following word that begins with a vowel— 
moves quickly and smoothly towards its conclusion. One has to 
be careful with this conclusion. Catullus’s invitation to Fabullus 
to imagine himself as nothing but a huge nose may come across 
as comic and grotesque—see below for the possible sexual inter-
pretation—but I also tried to convey the lyricism. (Also, here’s a 
slight departure from the original. In this Fabullus will make his 
prayer to the gods in general; in my version he prays to the love-
gods who had donated the perfume, although that was no doubt 
the implication Catullus intended.) Moreover, please note that 
70     Transference
“Venuses and Cupids” are to be conceived as a plurality of spir-
its, emanations from those two deities. There are parallels in 
some of his other poems such as III and LXXXVIII.
Latin verse is based on quantity (length of syllable) rather 
than syllable-stress as in English. The verse form in the original 
is the hendecasyllable, which employs a combination of trochees 
(long – short), spondees (long – long), with the second foot being 
a dactyl (long – short – short). To use the same meter in Eng-
lish seemed unnatural and ineffective, so I decided to use short 
rhyming lines (four quatrains with a concluding tercet), stress-
based, rather traditional in style but I hope not archaic. The 
meters I use are a combination of iambic and trochaic, with two 
or three dactyls (depending on how line 17 is analysed) thrown in. 
The number of feet per line varies between three and four. Some 
lines are catalectic, i.e. with an extra syllable tagged on to the end. 
This approach may strike some as technical inconsistency, even 
ineptitude, but I feel it lends my verse a certain unpredictabil-
ity, which I find attractive. Anyway, in a world drowning in free 
verse, why should one worry about some slight metrical incon-
sistency, which at least offsets the rigidity of the rhyme scheme? 
This is as follows: ABAB CDCD EFEF GHGH III. It 
should, hopefully, read like an extended Shakespearian sonnet, 
though with shorter lines. I like the concluding three rhymes, 
though some might find them clunky. It is all a matter of ear. 
Line 18 was inserted to make clear which gods were to be peti-
tioned (see above). “Contribute,” ending line 5, may, according 
to the dictionary, receive its main stress either on the penulti-
mate or ante-penultimate syllable. The latter, with a secondary 
stress on the final syllable, gives a smoother rhyme with “cute,” 
and that’s what I intended. 
As to the structure and interpretation of Catullus XIII, 
Helm (1981) finds it an example of humour para prosdokian 
(Greek), or “contrary to expectation.” There are three jokes: 
Catullus invites Fabullus to dinner ... but Fabullus must provide 
the dinner; Catullus’s purse is full ... of cobwebs; the exquisite 
perfume that Lesbia will provide will, if Fabullus’s prayers are 
granted, turn him into ... a huge nose! 
Is this invitation poem really a bona fide invitation or 
just a parody of a common classical sub-genre? Many scholars 
are confident in proposing the latter, e.g.:
fall 2017     71
“It can be seen that the poem is only nominally addressed 
to Fabullus; in reality its central purpose is to compliment Les-
bia” (Vessey, 1971). 
I am not so sure of this. The affectionate tone (and in 
many poems Catullus shows great affection to his friends) 
half-persuades me that Catullus is truly addressing him. The 
situation described is also not that far-fetched. As a modern 
analogy, I can imagine the modern equivalent of one friend 
inviting another round for a meal providing he/she stops off at 
a Chinese takeaway on the way. It happens!
Next, I want to deal with the “revisionist” (term employed 
by Witke, 1980) sexual interpretation of this poem. Is the nose 
in fact a penis? Martin (1992) suggests this:
“That transformation is explicitly an erotic one; part of 
the reason why the poem is so funny is that we recognize in the 
concentration of Fabullus’s sensuality into a single, enlarged 
organ, an erection of the nose.”
Going along with this interpretation, if we may, for the 
time being, what excites the erection? Here is Littman’s (1977) 
suggestion:
“I suggest that ‘unguentum’ refers to Lesbia’s vaginal 
secretions which sexual excitement causes to flow.”
And: 
“The air of innocence now fades, and the poem becomes con-
crete, earthy and sensual, like many of Catullus’s other poems.”
And again:
“Whether or not the invitation to dinner is real, Catullus 
offers Fabullus Lesbia’s genitals to smell. This suggests that 
since Catullus offers her genitals, he offers the girl, ....”
I find it quite easy to accept the association of nose 
with penis; it occurs in many cultures. Did Catullus intend it? 
Certainly, it may account for the discomfort we may feel, and 
Fabullus may have felt, although to be turned into a nose would 
in itself be sufficiently grotesque! It is, I think, a deniable inter-
pretation. If questioned, Catullus might have said in response: 
“Oh, I just meant a nose, nothing else!” Nevertheless, whether 
we are Freudian or not, sex is a place our minds often go, and 
Catullus was clearly a highly-sexed young man.
72     Transference
With regard to Littman’s thesis, it seems much less plau-
sible. Witke advances several arguments against it. The most 
cogent of them is psychological: given the extremely jealous 
and possessive attitude Catullus shows towards Lesbia in other 
poems, Catullus is unlikely to have “offered” her to any of his 
friends. Another is cultural: the Romans found bodily effusions 
and secretions disgusting. Nevertheless, his mind may have 
gone there, whether as writer or as reader of his own poems. My 
use of the adjective “cunning” to describe the perfume’s power 
to insinuate itself insidiously into the brain may also have sub-
consciously reflected this association even before I had read of 
it. Think of the archaic obscenity “cunny” or the modern one 
that has replaced it. 
However, I do not wish to foist this rather Freudian 
reading onto you without mentioning that there are other 
interpretations. For example, Vessey (1977) proposes that the 
unguentum is both a physical perfume-ointment, a conven-
tional contribution to Roman dinner-parties, and the ointment 
of Aphrodite, which confers kallos (beauty). Quinn (1973) says 
something similar, quoting Propertius 2.29.15–18:
“a reference to the idea that a lovely woman, like a god-
dess, emitted a special characteristic fragrance, which was her 
aura; ….” 
In all events, the reader must beware of claiming to know 
Catullus’s mind. It is to some extent a mystery to us, as it may 
have been to him. It is quite possible that the poem is suscepti-
ble to different interpretations, equally valid if apparently con-
tradictory. Catullus has loosed the perfume and the nose onto 
the world, and their significance is now beyond his control!
Finally, let me express my own attitude to poetic transla-
tion as applied to this poem. Of course, the translator needs to 
engage with the original and wrestle meaning from the source 
poet’s words and phrases. But I think that there is a margin, 
narrow or broad, within which the translator can operate and 
express his or her creativity. This accounts for my deliberate 
mistranslation of paucis ... diebus (in a few days) as “within a 
/ week,” which maintains the alliterated w’s and is not too far 
from the original. Also, the greater length of my translation, 19 
lines as against 14. This is due partly to the looser structure of 
English compared to the highly compressed Latin, and partly to 
fall 2017     73
a certain joie de vivre, if I may say so, which reflects Catullus’s 
own.
The relationship between translator and source poet is 
like that between dog and owner, out for a walk together: at 
times, the dog will pad along at the owner’s side; at other times, 
it will be off exploring on its own account until the owner calls it 
or pulls on the leash. This tension is in itself creative. The worst 
mistranslation is the one which may be faithful to the original 
but is bald, prosy and boring. 
Source text: 
Quinn, Kenneth. Catullus: The Poems. Edited with Introduction, Revised 
Text and Commentary. 2nd ed., Saint Martin's Press, Macmillan Education 
Ltd. 1973, text of Catullus XIII p. 9, commentary on XIII p. 135. 
References:
Helm, James J. “Poetic Structure and Humor: Catullus 13.” The Classical
World 74. No. 4. Dec 1980 – Jan 1981, pp. 213–17. http://www. 
jstor.org./stable/4349291  
Littman, Robert J. “The Unguent of Venus: Catullus 13.” Latomus, T. 36, 
Fasc.1 JANVIER – MARS 1977, Societé d’Études Latines de Bruxelles, 
pp. 123–28, http://www.jstor.org./stable/41530251
Martin, Charles. Catullus. Hermes Books, Yale University Press, 1992, p. 135.
Vessey, D.W.T.C. “Thoughts on Two Poems by Catullus: 13 and 30. Lato-
mus, T.30.” Fasc.1 JANVIER – MARS 1971, Societé d’Études Latines de 
Bruxelles, pp. 45–55. http://www.jstor.org./stable/41527854
Witke, Charles. “Catullus 13: A reexamination.” Classical Philology, vol. 75, 
no. 4, 1980, pp. 325–31. http://www.journals.chicago.uchicago.edu


\u3cem\u3eTo Fabullus (Invitation)\u3c/em\u3e by Catullus

Transference Volume 5 Issue 1 | Fall 2017 Article 14 2017 To Fabullus (Invitation) by Catullus Ranald A. Barnicot Barnet and Southgate College, London, ranaldb3@hotmail.com Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/transference  Part of the Classical Literature and Philology Commons, Comparative Literature Commons, East Asian Languages and Societies Commons, European Languages and Societies Commons, French and Francophone Language and Literature Commons, German Language and Literature Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, Language Interpretation and Translation Commons, Linguistics Commons, Modern Languages Commons, Modern Literature Commons, Near Eastern Languages and Societies Commons, Poetry Commons, and the Reading and Language Commons Recommended Citation Barnicot, Ranald A. (2017) "To Fabullus (Invitation) by Catullus," Transference: Vol. 5: Iss. 1, Article 14. Available at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/transference/vol5/iss1/14 68     TransferenceRanald Barnicot Gaius Valerius CatullusTo Fabullus (Invitation) XIIIFabullus, you’ll dine well within aWeek chez moi, gods willing,But make sure you bring a dinnerAmple, tasty, filling.Also you’ll need to contributeLaughs (the lot!), salt wit and wine,A girl – mind! – radiantly cute.Bring these, my charmer, and you’ll dineWell, I say, because yours trulyHas a purse that’s cobweb-packed,But you’ll be requited duly:Pure love’s my part in this compact,Or what’s even more becoming:For I’ll present you with a perfumeOf a power suave and cunning,My sweet girl’s gift from love-gods, whom(Venuses, Cupids, such as those)You’ll petition to metamorphoseYou into nothing else but nose.fall 2017     69CommentaryAccording to St Jerome (mid fourth century to early fifth cen-tury CE) Gaius Valerius Catullus was born in Verona in 87 BCE and died at the age of 30 in 58–7 BCE. However, given internal evidence in the poems, this end-date cannot be right, so many scholars have brought the birth-year forward by three years and made it 84 BCE. At any rate, it is the tradition that Catullus died as a relatively young man. His father appears to have been on friendly terms with Julius Caesar, whom, however, Catullus was to lampoon in a number of poems, together with Pompey and their associates. Plutarch tells us that they were reconciled just before Catullus’s death, and this is borne out by Catullus’s reference to Caesar’s conquests in Poem XI.Catullus was a poet of great wit, power and range (both in theme and in meter). He wrote poems celebrating friendship, mourning his brother, attacking enemies quite viciously and scabrously, recounting Greek legends and expressing his love, at first tender, later bitter and tormented, for his faithless lover, Lesbia, who was probably—though this also is disputed—Clodia Metelli, the wife and later widow of the soldier and politician Metellus Celer.Poem XIII is both an expression of warm, relaxed, light-hearted affection for a friend, and also, it seems, a love-poem to Lesbia, who is not mentioned by name. Another attractive fea-ture is the poet’s ability to laugh at himself (whether we should accept his protestations of penury at face value has been debat-ed). The verse is also elegant and with its several slick elisions —the slurring of final syllables of words that end with a vowel or an –m before a following word that begins with a vowel— moves quickly and smoothly towards its conclusion. One has to be careful with this conclusion. Catullus’s invitation to Fabullus to imagine himself as nothing but a huge nose may come across as comic and grotesque—see below for the possible sexual inter-pretation—but I also tried to convey the lyricism. (Also, here’s a slight departure from the original. In this Fabullus will make his prayer to the gods in general; in my version he prays to the love-gods who had donated the perfume, although that was no doubt the implication Catullus intended.) Moreover, please note that 70     Transference“Venuses and Cupids” are to be conceived as a plurality of spir-its, emanations from those two deities. There are parallels in some of his other poems such as III and LXXXVIII.Latin verse is based on quantity (length of syllable) rather than syllable-stress as in English. The verse form in the original is the hendecasyllable, which employs a combination of trochees (long – short), spondees (long – long), with the second foot being a dactyl (long – short – short). To use the same meter in Eng-lish seemed unnatural and ineffective, so I decided to use short rhyming lines (four quatrains with a concluding tercet), stress-based, rather traditional in style but I hope not archaic. The meters I use are a combination of iambic and trochaic, with two or three dactyls (depending on how line 17 is analysed) thrown in. The number of feet per line varies between three and four. Some lines are catalectic, i.e. with an extra syllable tagged on to the end. This approach may strike some as technical inconsistency, even ineptitude, but I feel it lends my verse a certain unpredictabil-ity, which I find attractive. Anyway, in a world drowning in free verse, why should one worry about some slight metrical incon-sistency, which at least offsets the rigidity of the rhyme scheme? This is as follows: ABAB CDCD EFEF GHGH III. It should, hopefully, read like an extended Shakespearian sonnet, though with shorter lines. I like the concluding three rhymes, though some might find them clunky. It is all a matter of ear. Line 18 was inserted to make clear which gods were to be peti-tioned (see above). “Contribute,” ending line 5, may, according to the dictionary, receive its main stress either on the penulti-mate or ante-penultimate syllable. The latter, with a secondary stress on the final syllable, gives a smoother rhyme with “cute,” and that’s what I intended. As to the structure and interpretation of Catullus XIII, Helm (1981) finds it an example of humour para prosdokian (Greek), or “contrary to expectation.” There are three jokes: Catullus invites Fabullus to dinner ... but Fabullus must provide the dinner; Catullus’s purse is full ... of cobwebs; the exquisite perfume that Lesbia will provide will, if Fabullus’s prayers are granted, turn him into ... a huge nose! Is this invitation poem really a bona fide invitation or just a parody of a common classical sub-genre? Many scholars are confident in proposing the latter, e.g.:fall 2017     71“It can be seen that the poem is only nominally addressed to Fabullus; in reality its central purpose is to compliment Les-bia” (Vessey, 1971). I am not so sure of this. The affectionate tone (and in many poems Catullus shows great affection to his friends) half-persuades me that Catullus is truly addressing him. The situation described is also not that far-fetched. As a modern analogy, I can imagine the modern equivalent of one friend inviting another round for a meal providing he/she stops off at a Chinese takeaway on the way. It happens!Next, I want to deal with the “revisionist” (term employed by Witke, 1980) sexual interpretation of this poem. Is the nose in fact a penis? Martin (1992) suggests this:“That transformation is explicitly an erotic one; part of the reason why the poem is so funny is that we recognize in the concentration of Fabullus’s sensuality into a single, enlarged organ, an erection of the nose.”Going along with this interpretation, if we may, for the time being, what excites the erection? Here is Littman’s (1977) suggestion:“I suggest that ‘unguentum’ refers to Lesbia’s vaginal secretions which sexual excitement causes to flow.”And: “The air of innocence now fades, and the poem becomes con-crete, earthy and sensual, like many of Catullus’s other poems.”And again:“Whether or not the invitation to dinner is real, Catullus offers Fabullus Lesbia’s genitals to smell. This suggests that since Catullus offers her genitals, he offers the girl, ....”I find it quite easy to accept the association of nose with penis; it occurs in many cultures. Did Catullus intend it? Certainly, it may account for the discomfort we may feel, and Fabullus may have felt, although to be turned into a nose would in itself be sufficiently grotesque! It is, I think, a deniable inter-pretation. If questioned, Catullus might have said in response: “Oh, I just meant a nose, nothing else!” Nevertheless, whether we are Freudian or not, sex is a place our minds often go, and Catullus was clearly a highly-sexed young man.72     TransferenceWith regard to Littman’s thesis, it seems much less plau-sible. Witke advances several arguments against it. The most cogent of them is psychological: given the extremely jealous and possessive attitude Catullus shows towards Lesbia in other poems, Catullus is unlikely to have “offered” her to any of his friends. Another is cultural: the Romans found bodily effusions and secretions disgusting. Nevertheless, his mind may have gone there, whether as writer or as reader of his own poems. My use of the adjective “cunning” to describe the perfume’s power to insinuate itself insidiously into the brain may also have sub-consciously reflected this association even before I had read of it. Think of the archaic obscenity “cunny” or the modern one that has replaced it. However, I do not wish to foist this rather Freudian reading onto you without mentioning that there are other interpretations. For example, Vessey (1977) proposes that the unguentum is both a physical perfume-ointment, a conven-tional contribution to Roman dinner-parties, and the ointment of Aphrodite, which confers kallos (beauty). Quinn (1973) says something similar, quoting Propertius 2.29.15–18:“a reference to the idea that a lovely woman, like a god-dess, emitted a special characteristic fragrance, which was her aura; ….” In all events, the reader must beware of claiming to know Catullus’s mind. It is to some extent a mystery to us, as it may have been to him. It is quite possible that the poem is suscepti-ble to different interpretations, equally valid if apparently con-tradictory. Catullus has loosed the perfume and the nose onto the world, and their significance is now beyond his control!Finally, let me express my own attitude to poetic transla-tion as applied to this poem. Of course, the translator needs to engage with the original and wrestle meaning from the source poet’s words and phrases. But I think that there is a margin, narrow or broad, within which the translator can operate and express his or her creativity. This accounts for my deliberate mistranslation of paucis ... diebus (in a few days) as “within a / week,” which maintains the alliterated w’s and is not too far from the original. Also, the greater length of my translation, 19 lines as against 14. This is due partly to the looser structure of English compared to the highly compressed Latin, and partly to fall 2017     73a certain joie de vivre, if I may say so, which reflects Catullus’s own.The relationship between translator and source poet is like that between dog and owner, out for a walk together: at times, the dog will pad along at the owner’s side; at other times, it will be off exploring on its own account until the owner calls it or pulls on the leash. This tension is in itself creative. The worst mistranslation is the one which may be faithful to the original but is bald, prosy and boring. Source text: Quinn, Kenneth. Catullus: The Poems. Edited with Introduction, Revised Text and Commentary. 2nd ed., Saint Martin's Press, Macmillan Education Ltd. 1973, text of Catullus XIII p. 9, commentary on XIII p. 135. References:Helm, James J. “Poetic Structure and Humor: Catullus 13.” The ClassicalWorld 74. No. 4. Dec 1980 – Jan 1981, pp. 213–17. http://www. jstor.org./stable/4349291  Littman, Robert J. “The Unguent of Venus: Catullus 13.” Latomus, T. 36, Fasc.1 JANVIER – MARS 1977, Societé d’Études Latines de Bruxelles, pp. 123–28, http://www.jstor.org./stable/41530251Martin, Charles. Catullus. Hermes Books, Yale University Press, 1992, p. 135.Vessey, D.W.T.C. “Thoughts on Two Poems by Catullus: 13 and 30. Lato-mus, T.30.” Fasc.1 JANVIER – MARS 1971, Societé d’Études Latines de Bruxelles, pp. 45–55. http://www.jstor.org./stable/41527854Witke, Charles. “Catullus 13: A reexamination.” Classical Philology, vol. 75, no. 4, 1980, pp. 325–31. http://www.journals.chicago.uchicago.edu

https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1146&amp;context=transference

\u3cem\u3eTo Fabullus (Invitation)\u3c/em\u3e by Catullus

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

ScholarWorks at WMU

ScholarWorks at WMU