El concepto del daño moral bajo el prisma de la jurisprudencia

Abstract

At present debates continue taking place on what it must be understood by moral hurt, probably the abstraction of the term is the reason. Nevertheless, the autonomy of the moral hurt and his admission for the courts (from the year 1912) turns out to be unquestionable, as his indemnity. Our Courts do not offer a definition of moral hurt. His contribution is merely practical, and though there are numerous the judgments that analyze the question of the moral hurts, the majority they limit themselves to solving the raised case, with a clear tendency to enumerate the most significant suppositions in relation to the protected goods and to extend the area of this type of hurts