The application of biogas technologies in organic farming  involves many considerations: Benefits like improved fertilizer supply and fossil fuel savings are opposed to concerns about economical risks and incompliance with organic principles.

A questionnaire developed by Risø DTU gives an idea about some Danish stakeholders’ perceptions of benefits and drawbacks

Heiske, Stefan

Østergård, Hanne

English

The application of biogas technologies in organic farming involves many considerations: Benefits like improved fertilizer supply and fossil fuel savings are opposed to concerns about economical risks and incompliance with organic principles.A questionnaire developed by Risø DTU gives an idea about some Danish stakeholders’ perceptions of benefits and drawbacks.The application of biogas technologies in organic farming involves many considerations: Benefits like improved fertilizer supply and fossil fuel savings are opposed to concerns about economical risks and incompliance with organic principles. A questionnaire developed by Risø DTU gives an idea about some Danish stakeholders’ perceptions of benefits and drawbacks

Online Research Database In Technology

                       General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.  • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal   If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.     Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Dec 20, 2017Opinions on biogas in organic farmingHeiske, Stefan; Østergård, HannePublished in:ICROFS newsPublication date:2011Document VersionOgså kaldet Forlagets PDFLink back to DTU OrbitCitation (APA):Heiske, S., & Østergård, H. (2011). Opinions on biogas in organic farming. ICROFS news, (1), 8-9.1/20118In public debates about future energy supply, biogas is among the most widely considered technologies. The Danish government’s “Grøn vækst” programme (Green Growth) aims at substantially increasing bio-gas capacities in Denmark, mainly in the agricultural sector. Organic agricul-ture is highly dependent on external energy supply, at present mainly derived from fossil fuels. Biogas may be a chance to extend the sustainable approach being part of the organic prin-ciples to the energy use in organic farming. However, sustainable biogas production requires careful integration into local agricultural frameworks. Thus, its application raises many questions about e.g. economical possibilities and risks, fertilizer supply and application, compliance with organic principles, process reliability etc. The questionnaireA questionnaire about biogas in organic farming carried out by Risø DTU in connection with the re-search project BioConcens and INBIOM (see “Read more” Box) gives insight in how stakeholders perceive biogas technologies in orga-nic farming. Understanding the stakeholders’ point of view can point out critical issues related to biogas applications and thereby give impulses for targeted political actions.The biogas seminarIn December 2010, a seminar about biogas-based energy self suffiency in organic farming was arranged by BioConcens and INBIOM. The participants from agri-culture, advisory services, research and authorities identified factors, which are considered to be relevant in the discussion on the appli-cation of biogas.  The factors were grouped into four ca-tegories, namely Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats, following a so-called SWOT analysis. For the questionnaire, four factors from each SWOT-category were selected (see Figure 1), and respondents were asked to compare those pair wise. Results from  the questionnaireThe questionnaire was sent out to more than 200 people from the biogas and agricul-tural sector in Denmark as well as linked to the IN-ArticleOpinions on biogas in organic farming mixturesThe application of biogas technologies in organic farming involves many considerations:  Benefits like improved fertilizer supply and fossil fuel savings are opposed to concerns about economical risks and incompli-ance with organic principles.    A questionnaire developed by Risø DTU gives an idea about some Da-nish stakeholders’ perceptions of benefits and drawbacks.By Stefan Heiske and Hanne Østergård, Technical University of DenmarkRisø DTU National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy Figure 1:  Selected SWOT- factors with short description1/20119BIOM homepage. The answers were quantitati-vely evaluated using SWOT- AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process). The results are expressed in scores which identify the average weight of a factor to all other factors of a category. For detailed information about the met-hod see the reference box.A great majority supports biogas in organic agricul-ture75 stakeholders respon-ded to the questionnaire, of which 55% dealed with organic farming. Of the respondents, 88% stated that they would support politics promoting the ap-plication of biogas techno-logy in organic farming (5% no, 7% don’t know). The respondents were divided in stakeholder groups, na-mely research (51%), advisory services (24%), industry (16%) and others (9%). The average weightings of all respon-dents are shown as calcu-lated scores in Figure 2.Focus on fertilizer bene-fitsThe highest rated strength of having biogas in organic farming was identified as fertilizer supply by all stake-holder groups, while least weight was given to the strength-factor new source of income. The undesirable necessity of many organic farms to import conven-tional manure as fertilizer is presumably a reason for this priority, as degassed biomass can contribute to a self-supply of fertilizer.Emphasis on the impor-tance of subsidiesAmong opportunities, all stakeholder groups gave highest importance to subsi-dies. All other opportunity-factors were rated compara-tively low. For weaknesses, the picture was less clear: Researchers and advisory services identified financial risk as the most relevant weakness of the technology. In contrary, industry and “other” stakeholders found the greatest weakness to be shortage of biomass resour-ces and difficulties in plant operation, respectively. In the threats-category, political unsteadiness and limiting ru-les and laws had the highest priority. The high weighting of subsidies, financial risks and political unsteadiness underlines the importance of reliable framework condi-tions for the implementation of biogas technologies. This, along with the stakeholders’ generally supportive view on biogas technologies, suggests that with economic incentives and clear poli-tical targets biogas may be widely applied in organic agriculture. Incompliance with orga-nic principles?Concerns that biogas could compromise organic principles have not been emphasized by many respondents, while this factor was considered important by some partici-pants in the December semi-nar. The priorities set by the respondents may indicate that for these people suffi-cient regulations have been established to maintain the organic principles and the difference between biogas applications in organic and conventional agriculture.More than energy  productionUnlike a wind turbine, a biogas fermenter is more than an energy production plant:  Besides producing energy, the fermentation of biomass has many impacts on the farming system with respect to e.g. crop management and use of the involved biomasses. The respondents’ low rating of energy self-supply together with the emphasis on ferti-lizer supply benefits reflects this fact. Therefore, political initiatives need to consider both energy related aspects such as regulation for end use of heat and power, as well as land use aspects like legislation on the applicati-on of degassed biomass and the introduction of external organic wastes.  Article ArticleRead moreFind more information about BIOCONCENS  pro-ject and INBIOM on the webpages: www.icrofs.org/Pages/Research/darcofIII_bio-concens.html and  www.inbiom.dk/en/knowledge/knowledge.htmReference  P. Dwivedi, J. Alavalapati, 2009: Stakeholders’ percep-tions on forest biomass-ba-sed bioenergy development in the southern US. Energy policy 37, 1999-2007.Figure  2: Weighting of the selected SWOT-factors (all respondents) 

Opinions on biogas in organic farming

Organic Eprints

1/2011 8In public debates about future energy supply, biogas is among the most widely considered technologies. The Danish government’s “Grøn vækst” programme (Green Growth) aims at substantially increasing bio-gas capacities in Denmark, mainly in the agricultural sector. Organic agricul-ture is highly dependent on external energy supply, at present mainly derived from fossil fuels. Biogas may be a chance to extend the sustainable approach being part of the organic prin-ciples to the energy use in organic farming. However, sustainable biogas production requires careful integration into local agricultural frameworks. Thus, its application raises many questions about e.g. economical possibilities and risks, fertilizer supply and application, compliance with organic principles, process reliability etc. The questionnaireA questionnaire about biogas in organic farming carried out by Risø DTU in connection with the re-search project BioConcens and INBIOM (see “Read more” Box) gives insight in how stakeholders perceive biogas technologies in orga-nic farming. Understanding the stakeholders’ point of view can point out critical issues related to biogas applications and thereby give impulses for targeted political actions.The biogas seminarIn December 2010, a seminar about biogas-based energy self suffiency in organic farming was arranged by BioConcens and INBIOM. The participants from agri-culture, advisory services, research and authorities identified factors, which are considered to be relevant in the discussion on the appli-cation of biogas.  The factors were grouped into four ca-tegories, namely Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats, following a so-called SWOT analysis. For the questionnaire, four factors from each SWOT-category were selected (see Figure 1), and respondents were asked to compare those pair wise. Results from  the questionnaireThe questionnaire was sent out to more than 200 people from the biogas and agricul-tural sector in Denmark as well as linked to the IN-ArticleOpinions on biogas in organic farming mixturesThe application of biogas technologies in organic farming involves many considerations:  Benefits like improved fertilizer supply and fossil fuel savings are opposed to concerns about economical risks and incompli-ance with organic principles.    A questionnaire developed by Risø DTU gives an idea about some Da-nish stakeholders’ perceptions of benefits and drawbacks.By Stefan Heiske and Hanne Østergård, Technical University of DenmarkRisø DTU National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy Figure 1:  Selected SWOT- factors with short description1/2011 9BIOM homepage. The answers were quantitati-vely evaluated using SWOT- AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process). The results are expressed in scores which identify the average weight of a factor to all other factors of a category. For detailed information about the met-hod see the reference box.A great majority supports biogas in organic agricul-ture75 stakeholders respon-ded to the questionnaire, of which 55% dealed with organic farming. Of the respondents, 88% stated that they would support politics promoting the ap-plication of biogas techno-logy in organic farming (5% no, 7% don’t know). The respondents were divided in stakeholder groups, na-mely research (51%), advisory services (24%), industry (16%) and others (9%). The average weightings of all respon-dents are shown as calcu-lated scores in Figure 2.Focus on fertilizer bene-fitsThe highest rated strength of having biogas in organic farming was identified as fertilizer supply by all stake-holder groups, while least weight was given to the strength-factor new source of income. The undesirable necessity of many organic farms to import conven-tional manure as fertilizer is presumably a reason for this priority, as degassed biomass can contribute to a self-supply of fertilizer.Emphasis on the impor-tance of subsidiesAmong opportunities, all stakeholder groups gave highest importance to subsi-dies. All other opportunity-factors were rated compara-tively low. For weaknesses, the picture was less clear: Researchers and advisory services identified financial risk as the most relevant weakness of the technology. In contrary, industry and “other” stakeholders found the greatest weakness to be shortage of biomass resour-ces and difficulties in plant operation, respectively. In the threats-category, political unsteadiness and limiting ru-les and laws had the highest priority. The high weighting of subsidies, financial risks and political unsteadiness underlines the importance of reliable framework condi-tions for the implementation of biogas technologies. This, along with the stakeholders’ generally supportive view on biogas technologies, suggests that with economic incentives and clear poli-tical targets biogas may be widely applied in organic agriculture. Incompliance with orga-nic principles?Concerns that biogas could compromise organic principles have not been emphasized by many respondents, while this factor was considered important by some partici-pants in the December semi-nar. The priorities set by the respondents may indicate that for these people suffi-cient regulations have been established to maintain the organic principles and the difference between biogas applications in organic and conventional agriculture.More than energy  productionUnlike a wind turbine, a biogas fermenter is more than an energy production plant:  Besides producing energy, the fermentation of biomass has many impacts on the farming system with respect to e.g. crop management and use of the involved biomasses. The respondents’ low rating of energy self-supply together with the emphasis on ferti-lizer supply benefits reflects this fact. Therefore, political initiatives need to consider both energy related aspects such as regulation for end use of heat and power, as well as land use aspects like legislation on the applicati-on of degassed biomass and the introduction of external organic wastes.  Article ArticleRead moreFind more information about BIOCONCENS  pro-ject and INBIOM on the webpages: www.icrofs.org/Pages/Research/darcofIII_bio-concens.html and  www.inbiom.dk/en/knowledge/knowledge.htmReference  P. Dwivedi, J. Alavalapati, 2009: Stakeholders’ percep-tions on forest biomass-ba-sed bioenergy development in the southern US. Energy policy 37, 1999-2007.Figure  2: Weighting of the selected SWOT-factors (all respondents) 

http://orbit.dtu.dk/ws/files/51527903/18983.pdf

Opinions on biogas in organic farming

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Online Research Database In Technology

Organic Eprints