Materials and neuroscience: validating tools for large-scale, high-density neural recording

Abstract

Extracellular recording remains the only technique capable of measuring the activity of many neurons simultaneously with a sub-millisecond precision, in multiple brain areas, including deep structures. Nevertheless, many questions about the nature of the detected signal and the limitations/capabilities of this technique remain unanswered. The general goal of this work is to apply the methodology and concepts of materials science to answer some of the major questions surrounding extracellular recording, and thus take full advantage of this seminal technique. We start out by quantifying the effect of electrode impedance on the amplitude of measured extracellular spikes and background noise. Can we improve data quality by lowering electrode impedance? We demonstrate that if the proper recording system is used, then the impedance of a microelectrode, within the range typical of standard polytrodes (~ 0.1 to 2 MΩ), does not significantly affect a neural spike amplitude or the background noise, and therefore spike sorting. In addition to improving the performance of each electrode, increasing the number of electrodes in a single neural probe has also proven advantageous for simultaneously monitoring the activity of more neurons with better spatiotemporal resolution. How can we achieve large-scale, highdensity extracellular recordings without compromising brain tissue? Here we report the design and in vivo validation of a complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor (CMOS)-based scanning probe with 1356 electrodes arranged along approximately 8 mm of a thin shaft (50 μm thick and 100 μm wide). Additionally, given the ever-shrinking dimensions of CMOS technology, there is a drive to fabricate sub-cellular electrodes (< 10 μm). Therefore, to evaluate electrode configurations for future probe designs, several recordings from many different brain regions were performed with an ultra-dense probe containing 255 electrodes, each with a geometric area of 5 x 5 μm and a pitch of 6 μm. How can we validate neural probes with different electrode materials/configurations and different sorting algorithms? We describe a new procedure for precisely aligning two probes for in vivo “paired-recordings” such that the spiking activity of a single neuron is monitored with both a dense extracellular silicon polytrode and a juxtacellular micro-pipette. We gathered a dataset of paired-recordings, which is available online. The “ground truth” data, for which one knows exactly when a neuron in the vicinity of an extracellular probe generates an action potential, has been used for several groups to validate and quantify the performance of new algorithms to automatically detect/sort single-units

    Similar works