Robinson, Lance W.

CGSpace (CGIAR)

How Landscape Level Governance and Land Use Planning are Connected: Insights from Case Studies in Marsabit, Isiolo and MakueniLance W. Robinson, ILRIExperience Sharing in Land Use Planning Workshop, Nairobi, 11-12 February 2015Introduction? This presentation draws on three different studies from three different projects? All three were focused on natural resource governance, but all three in the end had implications for land us planningAn institutional assessment of the Mt. Marsabit governance system? Study focused treated Mt. Marsabit as a landscape ecosystem? Considered on institutions and governance as they were prior to the implementation of new constitutionAt what level do these actors operate?Level ActorMarsabit DistrictALRMP, NEMA, DSG, DEC, DSC, County CouncilMt. Marsabit KFS, KWS, MECOGLocation EMCsCommunityNGOsWard CouncilorsTraditionalInstitutionsTraditional InstitutionsAccountability:Med.-StrongAccountability: Med.Accountability:Weak-Med.Accountability:WeakLegitimacy: StrongLegitimacy: StrongResources:Weak-MedResources:Weak-Med.NDMAKFSKWSNEMAGovernmentActorsDEC   DSGTechnicalCommittees& ForumsEMCsCommunityActorsDSCNGOsMECOGOtherActorsElected RepresentativesMt. Marsabit – institutional linkages? Those governance actors with greatest levels of accountability and legitimacy were poorly connected to? Key coordination forums? Those governance actors with the greatest ability to mobilize resources? This compromised the overall capacity of the institutional systemInstitutional dimensions of climate change adaptation in Middle Kaiti, Makueni County? WRUAs and CFAs, key local organizations? A need for collaboration amongst them, and vertically with the CountyThe hilly landscape of middle Kaiti, MakueniMiddle Kaiti Landscape, Makueni County? We identified the landscape as a “problemshed”? Linkages at local, watershed, landscape levels weak but improving? Linkages up to County level poor? Many of the components are in place, but the whole is less than the sum of the partsStudy of natural resource governance structures at Garba Tula, Isiolo County? Rangeland planning based on a traditional rangeland territory and customary institutions? Good participatory engagement at community and rangeland level? Efforts later to institutionalize the plan at County level have stalled? Challenges with horizontal relationships with other pastoralists? Rangeland planning, NRM, LUP are all multi-levelLand Use Planning Connections? What will be the planning units?? How to do planning at multiple levels?? Using LUP to strengthen institutional linkagesThe presentation has a Creative Commons license. You are free to re-use or distribute this work, provided credit is given to ILRI.better lives through livestockilri.org

How landscape level governance and land use planning are connected: Insights from case studies in Marsabit, Isiolo and Makueni

Robinson, L.

https://cgspace.cgiar.org/bitstream/10568/69406/1/LUPLearning2015-Robinson.pdf

How landscape level governance and land use planning are connected: Insights from case studies in Marsabit, Isiolo and Makueni

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

CGSpace (CGIAR)

CGSpace (CGIAR)