\u410\u431\u445\u430\u437\u441\u43a\u438\u439 \u430\u43d\u430\u43b\u438\u442\u438\u447\u435\u441\u43a\u438\u439 \u430\u43b\u444\u430\u432\u438\u442 \u430\u43a\u430\u434\u435\u43c\u438\u43a\u430 \u41d. \u42f. \u41c\u430\u440\u440\u430. \u42d\u432\u43e\u43b\u44e\u446\u438\u44f, \u440\u435\u432\u43e\u43b\u44e\u446\u438\u44f \u438 \u44f\u437\u44b\u43a\u43e\u432\u43e\u435 \u441\u442\u440\u43e\u438\u442\u435\u43b\u44c\u441\u442\u432\u43e

Abstract

The present paper features a brief history of the transcription-transliteration system which was created at the end of the 19th century by the academician Nikolay Yakovlevich Marr on the basis of the Roman al-phabet. Originally devised for the graphic representation of Georgian and Armenian languages, it was then further elaborated and extended in order to be applied to the graphic rendition of all Caucasian languages, which were considered to form a single language family, called Japhetic. Further, in 1926 a variant of it was adapted to the consonant-rich Abkhaz and introduced as its official al-phabet; because of its too complicated character, however, it was replaced two years later by a more sui-table Latin-based alphabet. Like the whole linguistic activity of its creator, this system, which was differently labeled and used in the course of the time (Japhetidological transcription, analytical alphabet, Abkhaz analytical alphabet), offers a quite interesting overview of the epistemological and theoretical issues that were on the agenda in the twenties and thirties. Strongly criticised by famous exponents of Soviet linguistics (among them E. D. Po-livanov and N. F. Yakovlev), the Abkhaz analytical alphabet can be only partially considered as Marr\u2019s personal contribution to the Latinisation movement during the cultural revolution. Our analysis tries to highlight the correlation between the cultural climate change after the October revo-lution and the ideological interpretation and epistemological evolution of Marr\u2019s analytical alphabet