The Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR) has been tasked by EFSA to revise the SANCO guidance Document on Terrestrial Ecotoxicology which is currently used for conducting the risk assessment for terrestrial non-target organisms, except for birds and mammals and non-target arthropods. For each group of organisms, the PPR Panel first summarises the science behind the respective risk assessment in a scientific opinion and, in a second step, EFSA will develop practical guidance on how to perform the risk assessment. The main scope of the revision is to take into consideration: (i) the entry into force of the Regulation 1107/2009 replacing the Directive 91/414/EEC; (ii) the need for developing specific protection goals and (iii) the inclusion of new scientific elements in the environmental risk assessment of in-soil organisms. The Opinion only covers chemical plant protection products (PPPs), while microbial PPPs are not specifically addressed in the opinion. The working group of the PPR Panel reviewed the current environmental risk assessment, identified key drivers that sustain important soil ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes and developed proposals for specific protection goal (SPG) options for in-field and off-field areas, according to the procedure developed in the opinion of the PPR Panel of 2010 Based on the overarching ecosystem services concept, which was boosted in the so-called Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, those ecosystem services that could potentially be directly or indirectly (e.g. via trophic interactions) affected by the normal agricultural use of plant protection products were first identified, followed by the groups of in-soil organisms that are key drivers or service providing units (SPUs) for those ecosystem services. Specific protection goal (SPG) options have to be proposed for each combination of a key driver and ecosystem service. During the development of the opinion, several research needs covering different aspects in the context of pesticides risk assessment for in-soil organisms have been identified. Some of those needs, such as standardisation of toxicity tests with additional species than the standard ones, should be prioritised before the development of the guidance document. A public consultation on the draft opinion was launched in May, 2016 aiming at involving all the interested stakeholders
