CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Research
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
A critical analysis of design, facts, bias and inference in the approximate number system training literature: A systematic review
Authors
T Myers
D Szűcs
Publication date
29 November 2016
Publisher
Trends in Neuroscience and Education
Doi
Cite
Abstract
© 2016 Elsevier GmbHA popular suggestion states that an evolutionarily grounded analogue magnitude representation, also called an approximate number system (ANS) or ‘number sense’ underlies human mathematical knowledge. During recent years many studies aimed to train the ANS with the intention of transferring improvements to symbolic arithmetic. Here we critically evaluate all published studies. We conclude that there is no conclusive evidence that specific ANS training improves symbolic arithmetic. We provide a citation analysis demonstrating that highly controversial results often get cited in support of specific claims without discussion of controversies. We suggest ways to run future training studies so that clear evidence can be collected and also suggest that data should be discussed considering both supporting and contrary evidence and arguments
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.tine.2016...
Last time updated on 24/12/2020
Sustaining member
Apollo (Cambridge)
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1...
Last time updated on 21/11/2017