Buckley, C. L.

Bullock, Seth

Davies, Adam

Mills, Rob

Noble, Jason

Penn, Alexandra

Watson, Richard

English

Explore Bristol Research

Adaptation without natural selection

Southampton (e-Prints Soton)

Proc. of the Alife XII Conference, Odense, Denmark, 2010 80Adaptation Without Natural Selection Richard A. Watson1, Rob Mills1, C.L. Buckley2, Simon Powers1, Alexandra Penn1, Adam Davies1, Jason Noble1, Seth Bullock1 1Natural Systems group, ECS, University of Southampton, U.K.     2CCNR, Informatics, University of Sussex, U.K. raw@ecs.soton.ac.uk Extended Abstract How  can  a  system  become  better  adapted  over  time  without  natural  selection?  Although  some  argue  for  ‘organismic’ properties  such  as  robustness  and  self-sustaining  regulation  in  non-evolved  systems  [1,5,11],  others  insist  that  natural selection is the only source of true adaptation [3]. We suggest that understanding how adaptation can occur without natural selection remains a fundamental open question for the Artificial Life community. For example, the origin of life, the origin of evolution, and the origin of new units of selection in the major evolutionary transitions/biological dynamical hierarchies, all seem to imply an adaptive process, or at least a non-arbitrary organisational process, that precedes the onset of natural selection proper (at each level of organisation).  In  recent  work  we  have  been  developing  a  number  of  inter-related  concepts  that  approach  this  question  from different angles [2,6,7,8,9,10,12,13,14,15]. In a general sense, it is known that a complex dynamical system can self-organise in a manner that reflects structure in external perturbations. But more specifically, we find that when variables in the system have a bi-modal distribution of decay constants (some fast and many slow), slow variables spontaneously act in a manner functionally equivalent to the weights of a neural network undergoing Hebbian learning, thereby modulating the behaviour of the fast variables such that the resultant internalised structure takes the form of an associative memory [4]. The proximal cause of these changes is merely that such a configuration is less resistant to, and hence less affected by, the perturbations to the  system  (c.f.  homeostasis).  But  the  system-scale  consequences  of  this  structuring  is  that  such  a  system  can  ‘recall’, ‘recognise’ or ‘classify’ stimuli and, given appropriate structure in the perturbations, generalise to previously unseen stimuli, in just the same manner as a trained neural network [4]. This provides a framework to connect the concepts of a dynamical system merely ‘doing what it does naturally’ at one scale of explanation with interpretation as an adaptive system at another. In particular, in the joint phase space of both fast and slow variables the system merely decreases in energy, as one would expect from any purely mechanistic explanation. But induced structure in the slow variables improves the ability to dissipate energy from the fast state variables. Thus with respect to the fast system variables only, systems organised in this manner do not merely minimise system energy but get better at minimising energy over time. When the external environment of the system corresponds to an optimisation problem, the system thus improves its ability to solve that problem over time. It is in this sense that we can understand the system, not just as self-organised, but adapted. We present an abstract model and simulation of this process and discuss how it relates to a number of different domains: the evolution of evolvability in gene regulation networks [12], the evolution of new units of selection  [10]  via  symbiosis  [15]  and  'social  niche  construction'  [8,9],  games  on  adaptive  networks  [2],  distributed optimisation in multi-agent complex adaptive systems [13,14] and multi-scale optimisation algorithms [6,7].  References 1.  Bateson,  G.  (1972).  Steps  to  an  Ecology  of  Mind:  Collected  Essays  in  Anthropology,  Psychiatry,  Evolution,  and Epistemology. University Of Chicago Press. 2.  Davies, A.P., Watson, R.A., Mills, R., Buckley, C. L., Noble, J. (2010) If you can't be with the one you love, love the one you’re with: How individual habituation of agent interactions improves global utility. ALife XII (to appear). 3.  Dawkins, R. (1982). The Extended Phenotype. Oxford, Freeman. 4.  Hopfield, J.J. (1982) Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities, PNAS USA, 79 (8) 2554. 5.  Lovelock, J.E. (1979). Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford, Oxford University Press.  6.  Mills, R. (2010) How Micro-Evolution Can Guide Macro-Evolution: Multi-Scale Search via Evolved Modular Variation. PhD thesis, ECS, University of Southampton. Proc. of the Alife XII Conference, Odense, Denmark, 2010 817.  Mills, R., & Watson, R.A. (2009) Symbiosis Enables the Evolution of Rare Complexes in Structured Environments. To appear Proceedings of European Conference on Artificial Life 2009. 8.  Powers, S. (2010) Social Niche Construction: Evolutionary Explanations for Cooperative Group Formation, PhD thesis, ECS Southampton (submitted). 9.  Powers, S.T., Mills, R. Penn, A.S., Watson, R.A. (2009) Social niche construction provides an adaptive explanation for new  levels  of  individuality  (ABSTRACT),  Proceedings  of  Workshop  on  Levels  of  Selection  and  Individuality  in Evolution, European Conference on Artificial Life.(in press) 10.  Powers, S.T., Penn, A.S. & Watson, R.A.  (2007) Individual Selection for Cooperative Group Formation. Proceedings of European Conference on Artificial Life 2007. pp. 585-594. 11.  Saunders, P.T. (1994) Evolution Without Natural Selection: Further Implications Of The Daisyworld Parable. Journal of Theoretical Biology 166 (1994) 365-373.  12.  Watson R.A., Buckley, C.L. & Mills, R. & Davies, A.P., (2010). Associative memory in gene regulation networks. ALife XII (in press). 13.  Watson  R.A.,  Buckley,  C.L.  &  Mills,  R.  (2010).  Optimisation  in  ‘Self-modelling’  Complex  Adaptive  Systems, Complexity (under revision)/ Tech. Report, ECS, University of Southampton. 14.  Watson, R. A., Mills, R, and Buckley, C. L. (2009) Global Adaptation in Networks of Selfish Components: Emergent Associative Memory at the System Scale.. (submitted)/Tech. Report, ECS, University of Southampton. 15.  Watson, R.A., Palmius, N., Mills, R., Powers, S.T., & Penn, A.S. (2009a) Can Selfish Symbioses Effect Higher-level Selection? European Conference on Artificial Life 2009. (in press).  

Associative memory in gene regulation networks. ALife XII

Can Selfish Symbioses Effect Higher-level Selection?

Evolution Without Natural Selection: Further Implications Of The Daisyworld Parable.

Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth.

Global Adaptation in Networks of Selfish Components: Emergent Associative Memory at the System Scale..

How Micro-Evolution Can Guide Macro-Evolution: Multi-Scale Search via Evolved Modular Variation.

If you can't be with the one you love, love the one you’re with: How individual habituation of agent interactions improves global utility. ALife XII

Individual Selection for Cooperative Group Formation.

Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities,

Social niche construction provides an adaptive explanation for new levels of individuality (ABSTRACT),

Social Niche Construction: Evolutionary Explanations for Cooperative Group Formation,

Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology.

Symbiosis Enables the Evolution of Rare Complexes in Structured Environments. To appear

The Extended Phenotype.

Adaptation without natural selection

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Explore Bristol Research

Southampton (e-Prints Soton)