Subsidiary implementation of administrative procedure law on public procurement law pattern

Abstract

Završni rad započinje uvodom u kojem se čitatelja uvodi u izabranu temu te upoznaje sa problematikom koja će se kasnije izložiti. Sadržajno rad polazi od tri sredine: u prvoj se vrši komparacija odredbi ZUP-a iz '91 i '09 sa odredbama Zakona o javnoj nabavi, u drugoj se izdvajaju odredbe ZUP-a koje će se najčešće koristiti u praksi, odnosno sukladno novijoj praksi DKOM-a te treća cjelina u kojoj se izlaže sudska praksa u žalbenom postupku kod javne nabave. Smisao i funkcija rada je da čitatelja potakne na dugoročno razmišljanje što konkretno u postupku javne nabave znači primjena svih odredbi ZUP-a koje se u tom postupku mogu primijeniti istovremeno namećući pitanje postoji li za takvo što bolje rješenje i koje.Final work begins with an introduction in which the reader is informed with selected topic and higlights the issues that will be later exposed. Substantially work is divided in several major topics: comparation of the Administative procedure Law published '91 and '09 than comparation with provisions of the Public Procurement Law, higlighting the articles of Administative procedure Law that will be commonly used in practice regardin the appellate proceedings by Public Procurement Law, and at last practice of the Commission, followed by case law on appeal by the Public Procurement Law. The sense and function of this work is to encourage readers to long-term thinking what specifically in the public procurement procedure means implement all the provisions of the Administative procedure Law that in this process can be applied at the same time imposing a question of whether there is any other better solution for appellate proceedings