CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
research
Patient-reported outcome assessment of inflammatory arthritis patient experience with intravenously administered biologic therapy
Authors
Shawn Black
Raphael J. DeHoratius
+5 more
Norman B. Gaylis
Wesley A. Kafka
Dennis Parenti
Joanne Sagliani
Kezhen L. Tang
Publication date
1 September 2017
Publisher
Jefferson Digital Commons
Doi
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate patient perspectives regarding utilization of intravenous (IV) therapy for inflammatory arthritis (IA). Methods: This was a single-center, non-interventional, patient questionnaire-based study of adult IA patients currently receiving IV biologics. At a single visit, patients completed the questionnaire comprising 30 questions centered on their experience receiving an intravenously administered therapy to treat their IA. The questionnaire included questions on patient demographics, disease characteristics, and previous biologic treatment for IA (subcutaneous [SC] and IV). Patients rated their level of agreement with statements regarding satisfaction with current IV biologic therapy and potential advantages and disadvantages of IV biologic therapy using a 5-point Likert scale (1= strongly disagree, 5= strongly agree). Results: One hundred patients were enrolled and completed the survey; 66% were female and the mean age was 58 years. Before IV treatment, 97% of patients received information regarding therapy options. Ninety patients ranked their satisfaction with current IV therapy as 4 or 5. The proportion of patients with an “extremely favorable” perception of IV therapy increased from 33% to 71% following initiation of their current medication. Thirty-one patients had previously received SC therapies to treat their IA. Conclusion: These results demonstrated an overall favorable perception of IV therapy among this patient population. Patients previously treated with SC therapy also had a positive shift in the perception of IV therapy after initiating IV therapy. Patients’ perception and preference for treatment options should be highly considered by the treating physician during or as part of a shared decision-making process. © 2017 Gaylis et al
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
info:doi/10.2147%2Fppa.s136567
Last time updated on 05/06/2019
Name not available
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:jdc.jefferson.edu:medfp-12...
Last time updated on 30/12/2017
Jefferson Digital Commons
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:jdc.jefferson.edu:medfp-12...
Last time updated on 20/11/2017