Correction to the original article published in 

Schizophrenia Bulletin, Volume 39, Issue 6, 1 November 2013, Pages 1328–1336; https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbs147

Chaddock, CA

Howes, OD

Joyce, EM

McGuire, P

Roiser, JP

UCL Discovery

1303Schizophrenia Bulletin vol. 42 no. 5 pp. 1303–1304, 2016 doi:10.1093/schbul/sbw025Advance Access publication March 16, 2016© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf  of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.ERRATACorrection to: Roiser JP, Howes OD, Chaddock CA, Joyce EM, McGuire P (2013). Neural and behavioral correlates of aberrant salience in individuals at risk for psychosis. Schizophr Bull. 39(6):1328–36. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbs147.This manuscript contained an error in the description of the cognitive task (the Salience Attribution Test), as the ver-sion used was slightly different to that of the original study (Roiser et al 2009, Psychol Med; 39:199–20).The text on the second page of the manuscript (page 1329 of the journal), under the heading Salience Attribution Test, should read as follows:The SAT is a speeded-response game, rewarded with money, which measures responses to task-relevant and task-irrelevant cue features.13,24 During the game, participants responded to a probe after seeing 1 of 4 categories of cues (blue animals, red animals, blue household objects, and red household objects), which varied along 2 dimensions (color and form; see online supplementary figure 1). Participants received monetary reward (5–100 pence) on some trials, with more money for faster responses. The probability of reward varied along one of the cue dimensions (task-relevant dimension, eg, color—blue stimuli: 87.5% rewarded; red stimuli: 0% rewarded), but not for the other (task-irrelevant dimension, eg, form—animal and household stimuli: both equally rewarded). The contingencies between category and reward probability were counterbalanced across participants and remained constant throughout the task. Two experi-mental sessions (64 trials each) were performed during fMRI. The SAT provides measures of adaptive (relevant) and aberrant (irrelevant) motivational salience on the basis of visual analogue scale ratings (VAS: explicit salience) and reaction times (RTs: implicit salience; see online supplementary methods).The online supplementary methods file has been corrected.

Neural and behavioral correlates of aberrant salience in individuals at risk for psychosis

http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10026134/1/Erratum.pdf

Neural and behavioral correlates of aberrant salience in individuals at risk for psychosis

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

UCL Discovery