research

The Case against Mercury as the Angrite Parent Body (APB)

Abstract

Angrites are not plausibly from Mercury based on their high FeO contents and ancient ages (e.g., [1]). Rather, the early crystallization ages of angrites argues for a small asteroidal-sized parent body for these meteorites (e.g., [2]). Despite this, recently it has been proposed that Mercury is the APB [3, 4, 5, 6]. Preserved corona and symplectite textures and the presence of 120 triple junctions in NWA 2999 have been cited as requiring a planetary origin [3, 4], with the symplectites in NWA 2999 resulting from rapid decompression during uplift via thrust faults on Mercury [4], and the coronas during subsequent cooling at low pressure. Glasses along grain boundaries and exsolution lamellae possibly indicative of rapid melting and cooling in NWA 4950 are cited as evidence of rapid decompression [6]. To explain the discrepancy between spectral observations of the Mercurian surface and the high FeO contents in angrites, an early (~4.5 Ga), collisionally-stripped FeO-rich basaltic surface has been suggested for Mercury [5, 6]

    Similar works