Martirosyan, Liana

University of Groningen

Prescribing quality indicators for type 2 diabetes management: development, validation and selection

Dissertations of the University of Groningen

   University of GroningenPrescribing quality indicators for type 2 diabetes management: development, validation andselectionMartirosyan, LianaIMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite fromit. Please check the document version below.Document VersionPublisher's PDF, also known as Version of recordPublication date:2011Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research databaseCitation for published version (APA):Martirosyan, L. (2011). Prescribing quality indicators for type 2 diabetes management: development,validation and selection. [S.n.].CopyrightOther than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of theauthor(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license.More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne-amendment.Take-down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediatelyand investigate your claim.Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons thenumber of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.Download date: 04-06-2022Stellingen behorende bij het proefschrift "Prescribing quality indicators for type 2 diabetes management: development, validation, and selection" 1. General practitioners and diabetologits disagree on what constitutes a good (first) drug choice for treatment of diabetic patients. (this thesis) 2. Use of diagnostic codes to identify patients with a certain condition overestimates the quality of provided care, if there is a diagnosis registration bias favoring patients already receiving the recommended treatment. (this thesis) 3. The more sophisticated a prescribing quality indicator is the more robust and the less feasible it is. (this thesis) 4. Health care providers do not prioritize prescribing indicators focusing on costs. (this thesis) 5. Doctors complain that the reasons for not complying with the guidelines are not taken into account, and the external stakeholders find fault that such reasons are not registered in medical records. (this thesis) 6. Relationships between prescribing indicators for diabetes care are not visible to the naked eye: in fact, the indicators cluster not on risk factor management, but rather on different levels of treatment intensification. (this thesis) 7. In science the credit goes to the man who convinces the world, not the man to whom the idea first occurs. Sir Francis Darwin 8. Every step you take, is a step away from where you used to be. Brian Chargualaf 9. We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. Anais Nin Liana Martirosyan, 15december2010 Mcdi:,l·he Bibl1othcek Groningen LT M C G 

English

Proceedings - University of Groningen

   University of GroningenPrescribing quality indicators for type 2 diabetes management: development, validation andselectionMartirosyan, LianaIMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite fromit. Please check the document version below.Document VersionPublisher's PDF, also known as Version of recordPublication date:2011Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research databaseCitation for published version (APA):Martirosyan, L. (2011). Prescribing quality indicators for type 2 diabetes management: development,validation and selection. [S.n.].CopyrightOther than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of theauthor(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license.More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne-amendment.Take-down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediatelyand investigate your claim.Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons thenumber of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.Download date: 03-06-2022Stellingen behorende bij het proefschrift "Prescribing quality indicators for type 2 diabetes management: development, validation, and selection" 1. General practitioners and diabetologits disagree on what constitutes a good (first) drug choice for treatment of diabetic patients. (this thesis) 2. Use of diagnostic codes to identify patients with a certain condition overestimates the quality of provided care, if there is a diagnosis registration bias favoring patients already receiving the recommended treatment. (this thesis) 3. The more sophisticated a prescribing quality indicator is the more robust and the less feasible it is. (this thesis) 4. Health care providers do not prioritize prescribing indicators focusing on costs. (this thesis) 5. Doctors complain that the reasons for not complying with the guidelines are not taken into account, and the external stakeholders find fault that such reasons are not registered in medical records. (this thesis) 6. Relationships between prescribing indicators for diabetes care are not visible to the naked eye: in fact, the indicators cluster not on risk factor management, but rather on different levels of treatment intensification. (this thesis) 7. In science the credit goes to the man who convinces the world, not the man to whom the idea first occurs. Sir Francis Darwin 8. Every step you take, is a step away from where you used to be. Brian Chargualaf 9. We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. Anais Nin Liana Martirosyan, 15december2010 Mcdi:,l·he Bibl1othcek Groningen LT M C G 

   University of GroningenPrescribing quality indicators for type 2 diabetes management: development, validation andselectionMartirosyan, LianaIMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite fromit. Please check the document version below.Document VersionPublisher's PDF, also known as Version of recordPublication date:2011Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research databaseCitation for published version (APA):Martirosyan, L. (2011). Prescribing quality indicators for type 2 diabetes management: development,validation and selection. [Thesis fully internal (DIV), University of Groningen]. [S.n.].CopyrightOther than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of theauthor(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license.More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne-amendment.Take-down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediatelyand investigate your claim.Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons thenumber of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.Download date: 09-09-2023Stellingen behorende bij het proefschrift "Prescribing quality indicators for type 2 diabetes management: development, validation, and selection" 1. General practitioners and diabetologits disagree on what constitutes a good (first) drug choice for treatment of diabetic patients. (this thesis) 2. Use of diagnostic codes to identify patients with a certain condition overestimates the quality of provided care, if there is a diagnosis registration bias favoring patients already receiving the recommended treatment. (this thesis) 3. The more sophisticated a prescribing quality indicator is the more robust and the less feasible it is. (this thesis) 4. Health care providers do not prioritize prescribing indicators focusing on costs. (this thesis) 5. Doctors complain that the reasons for not complying with the guidelines are not taken into account, and the external stakeholders find fault that such reasons are not registered in medical records. (this thesis) 6. Relationships between prescribing indicators for diabetes care are not visible to the naked eye: in fact, the indicators cluster not on risk factor management, but rather on different levels of treatment intensification. (this thesis) 7. In science the credit goes to the man who convinces the world, not the man to whom the idea first occurs. Sir Francis Darwin 8. Every step you take, is a step away from where you used to be. Brian Chargualaf 9. We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. Anais Nin Liana Martirosyan, 15december2010 Mcdi:,l·he Bibl1othcek Groningen LT M C G 

ARTS repository - University of Groningen

   University of GroningenPrescribing quality indicators for type 2 diabetes management: development, validation andselectionMartirosyan, LianaIMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite fromit. Please check the document version below.Document VersionPublisher's PDF, also known as Version of recordPublication date:2011Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research databaseCitation for published version (APA):Martirosyan, L. (2011). Prescribing quality indicators for type 2 diabetes management: development,validation and selection. [Thesis fully internal (DIV), University of Groningen]. [S.n.].CopyrightOther than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of theauthor(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license.More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne-amendment.Take-down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediatelyand investigate your claim.Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons thenumber of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.Download date: 31-10-2023Stellingen behorende bij het proefschrift "Prescribing quality indicators for type 2 diabetes management: development, validation, and selection" 1. General practitioners and diabetologits disagree on what constitutes a good (first) drug choice for treatment of diabetic patients. (this thesis) 2. Use of diagnostic codes to identify patients with a certain condition overestimates the quality of provided care, if there is a diagnosis registration bias favoring patients already receiving the recommended treatment. (this thesis) 3. The more sophisticated a prescribing quality indicator is the more robust and the less feasible it is. (this thesis) 4. Health care providers do not prioritize prescribing indicators focusing on costs. (this thesis) 5. Doctors complain that the reasons for not complying with the guidelines are not taken into account, and the external stakeholders find fault that such reasons are not registered in medical records. (this thesis) 6. Relationships between prescribing indicators for diabetes care are not visible to the naked eye: in fact, the indicators cluster not on risk factor management, but rather on different levels of treatment intensification. (this thesis) 7. In science the credit goes to the man who convinces the world, not the man to whom the idea first occurs. Sir Francis Darwin 8. Every step you take, is a step away from where you used to be. Brian Chargualaf 9. We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. Anais Nin Liana Martirosyan, 15december2010 Mcdi:,l·he Bibl1othcek Groningen LT M C G 

NARCIS 

   University of GroningenPrescribing quality indicators for type 2 diabetes management: development, validation andselectionMartirosyan, LianaIMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite fromit. Please check the document version below.Document VersionPublisher's PDF, also known as Version of recordPublication date:2011Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research databaseCitation for published version (APA):Martirosyan, L. (2011). Prescribing quality indicators for type 2 diabetes management: development,validation and selection. [S.n.].CopyrightOther than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of theauthor(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license.More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne-amendment.Take-down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediatelyand investigate your claim.Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons thenumber of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.Download date: 21-06-2022Stellingen behorende bij het proefschrift "Prescribing quality indicators for type 2 diabetes management: development, validation, and selection" 1. General practitioners and diabetologits disagree on what constitutes a good (first) drug choice for treatment of diabetic patients. (this thesis) 2. Use of diagnostic codes to identify patients with a certain condition overestimates the quality of provided care, if there is a diagnosis registration bias favoring patients already receiving the recommended treatment. (this thesis) 3. The more sophisticated a prescribing quality indicator is the more robust and the less feasible it is. (this thesis) 4. Health care providers do not prioritize prescribing indicators focusing on costs. (this thesis) 5. Doctors complain that the reasons for not complying with the guidelines are not taken into account, and the external stakeholders find fault that such reasons are not registered in medical records. (this thesis) 6. Relationships between prescribing indicators for diabetes care are not visible to the naked eye: in fact, the indicators cluster not on risk factor management, but rather on different levels of treatment intensification. (this thesis) 7. In science the credit goes to the man who convinces the world, not the man to whom the idea first occurs. Sir Francis Darwin 8. Every step you take, is a step away from where you used to be. Brian Chargualaf 9. We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. Anais Nin Liana Martirosyan, 15december2010 Mcdi:,l·he Bibl1othcek Groningen LT M C G 

https://pure.rug.nl/ws/files/67858068/L.Martirosyan_stellingen.pdf

Prescribing quality indicators for type 2 diabetes management: development, validation and selection

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

University of Groningen

Dissertations of the University of Groningen

Proceedings - University of Groningen

Proceedings - University of Groningen

ARTS repository - University of Groningen

NARCIS

Dissertations of the University of Groningen

ARTS repository - University of Groningen