CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Research
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Monthly land cover-specific evapotranspiration models derived from global eddy flux measurements and remote sensing data
Authors
Allen
Asrar
+88 more
Baldocchi
Baldocchi
Beer
Beer
Bonan
Bosch
Bracho
Budyko
Caldwell
Chen
Chen
Cheng
Cohen
Cramer
Domec
Domec
Dunn
Feng
Foken
Gholz
Goldstein
Gray
Hamon
Hollinger
Jackson
Jasechko
Jung
Justice
Kalma
King
Kurc
Kustas
Law
Leuning
Li
Liu
Lu
Lu
Mackay
Mahrt
Marquard
Mayocchi
McMahon
Mu
Mu
Nagler
Nakai
Oudin
Pandya
Peel
Ray
Running
Running
Sanford
SAS Institute Inc.
Schmid
Seneviratne
Shao
Shuttleworth
Smith
Song
Stoy
Sumner
Sun
Sun
Sun
Sun
Thompson
Thornton
Tian
Tian
Twine
Valentini
Vörösmarty
Williams
Wilson
Wilson
Xiao
Xiao
Xie
Yang
Yang
Zeng
Zhang
Zhang
Zheng
Zhou
Zhou
Publication date
1 January 2015
Publisher
'Wiley'
Doi
Abstract
Evapotranspiration (ET) is arguably the most uncertain ecohydrologic variable for quantifying watershed water budgets. Although numerous ET and hydrological models exist, accurately predicting the effects of global change on water use and availability remains challenging because of model deficiency and/or a lack of input parameters. The objective of this study was to create a new set of monthly ET models that can better quantify landscape-level ET with readily available meteorological and biophysical information. We integrated eddy covariance flux measurements from over 200 sites, multiple year remote sensing products from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), and statistical modelling. Through examining the key biophysical controls on ET by land cover type (i.e. shrubland, cropland, deciduous forest, evergreen forest, mixed forest, grassland, and savannas), we created unique ET regression models for each land cover type using different combinations of biophysical independent factors. Leaf area index and net radiation explained most of the variability of observed ET for shrubland, cropland, grassland, savannas, and evergreen forest ecosystems. In contrast, potential ET (PET) as estimated by the temperature-based Hamon method was most useful for estimating monthly ET for deciduous and mixed forests. The more data-demanding PET method, FAO reference ET model, had similar power as the simpler Hamon PET method for estimating actual ET. We developed three sets of monthly ET models by land cover type for different practical applications with different data availability. Our models may be used to improve water balance estimates for large basins or regions with mixed land cover types. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
University of New Hampshire
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:scholars.unh.edu:ersc-1127
Last time updated on 12/02/2021
UNL | Libraries
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:digitalcommons.unl.edu:usd...
Last time updated on 09/03/2019
DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:digitalcommons.unl.edu:usd...
Last time updated on 07/05/2016
of Botany,Chinese Academy Of Sciences
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:ir.ibcas.ac.cn:2S10CLM1/25...
Last time updated on 27/10/2022
UNH Scholars' Repository
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:scholars.unh.edu:ersc-1127
Last time updated on 14/09/2017
Oskar Bordeaux
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:oskar-bordeaux.fr:20.500.1...
Last time updated on 15/05/2024
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
info:doi/10.1002%2Feco.1629
Last time updated on 14/03/2019
University of New Hampshire
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:scholars.unh.edu:ersc-1127
Last time updated on 14/02/2021