CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
What can we learn from comparing glacio-hydrological models?
Authors
Kristian Förster
Florian Hanzer
+5 more
Matthias Huttenlau
Johanna Nemec
Felix Oesterle
Johannes Schöber
Elena Stoll
Publication date
1 January 2020
Publisher
Basel : Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
Doi
Cite
Abstract
Glacio-hydrological models combine both glacier and catchment hydrology modeling and are used to assess the hydrological response of high-mountain glacierized catchments to climate change. To capture the uncertainties from these model combinations, it is essential to compare the outcomes of several model entities forced with the same climate projections. For the first time, we compare the results of two completely independent glacio-hydrological models: (i) HQsim-GEM and (ii) AMUNDSEN. In contrast to prevailing studies, we use distinct glacier models and glacier initialization times. At first glance, the results achieved for future glacier states and hydrological characteristics in the Rofenache catchment in ötztal Alps (Austria) appear to be similar and consistent, but a closer look reveals clear differences. What can be learned from this study is that low-complexity models can achieve higher accuracy in the calibration period. This is advantageous especially when data availability is weak, and priority is given to efficient computation time. Furthermore, the time and method of glacier initialization play an important role due to different data requirements. In essence, it is not possible to make conclusions about the model performance outside of the calibration period or more specifically in the future. Hence, similar to climate modeling, we suggest considering different modeling approaches when assessing future catchment discharge or glacier evolution. Especially when transferring the results to stakeholders, it is vital to transparently communicate the bandwidth of future states that come with all model results. © 2020 by the authors
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
Institutionelles Repositorium der Leibniz Universität Hannover
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:www.repo.uni-hannover.de:1...
Last time updated on 11/04/2021
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:mdpi.com:/2073-4433/11/9/9...
Last time updated on 21/10/2022