CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Naïve and informed views on the nature of scientific inquiry in large-scale assessments: Two sides of the same coin or different currencies
Authors
Burnham K. P.
Field A.
+8 more
Gropengießer H.
Huang C.‐M.
Lederman N. G.
Little T.
Rosseel Y.
Upmeier zu Belzen A.
Vorholzer A.
Wenning C. J.
Publication date
1 January 2019
Publisher
Chichester : John Wiley and Sons Ltd
Doi
Cite
Abstract
Many models in the field of epistemic cognition conceptualize students' views as being on a continuum between the poles of naïve and informed views. Against this background, the aim of the present study was to find out whether views on the nature of scientific inquiry (NOSI views) should be conceptualized and quantitatively assessed in a more multiplistic manner, considering naïve and informed views in their own, separate dimensions. Based on a competence model defining three inquiry methods, we developed a Likert-scaled questionnaire containing 10 scales, each assessing one NOSI view. We administered the questionnaire to a sample of 802 students in the lower and upper levels of secondary school. Based on structural equation modeling, the analyses confirmed a 10-dimensional model, distinguishing between each naïve and informed views as the only adequate representation of the data. Latent class analysis and interview data revealed four profiles of NOSI views in the data, which differed with regard to their agreement or disagreement with different naïve and informed views. We interpret these findings as evidence that supports more multiplistic models, with relevance to conceptualizing, measuring, and fostering NOSI views. We derive future directions of nature of science and NOSI research linking basic and applied research using experimental studies. © 2019 The Author. Journal of Research in Science Teaching published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
Last time updated on 26/03/2021
Institutionelles Repositorium der Leibniz Universität Hannover
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:www.repo.uni-hannover.de:1...
Last time updated on 20/12/2020