An oxidation of allylic and benzylic alcohols to the corresponding carboxylic
acids is effected by merging a Cu-catalyzed oxidation using O2 as a terminal
oxidant with a subsequent chlorite oxidation (Lindgren oxidation). The
protocol was optimized to obtain pure products without chromatography or
crystallization. Interception at the aldehyde stage allowed for
Z/E-isomerization, thus rendering the oxidation stereoconvergent with respect
to the configuration of the starting material

Christmann, Mathias

Könning, Daniel

Olbrisch, Tobias

Sypaseuth, Fanni D.

Tzschucke, C. Christoph

Chemical Communications

The oxidation of allylic and benzylic alcohols to the corresponding carboxylic acids is effected by merging a Cu-catalyzed oxidation using O2 as a terminal oxidant with a subsequent chlorite oxidation (Lindgren oxidation).</p

Daniel Könning

Tobias Olbrisch

Fanni D. Sypaseuth

C. Christoph Tzschucke

Mathias Christmann

Crossref

Oxidation of allylic and benzylic alcohols to aldehydes and carboxylic acids

Institutional Repository of the Freie Universität Berlin

5014 | Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 5014--5016 This journal is©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014Cite this:Chem. Commun., 2014,50, 5014Oxidation of allylic and benzylic alcohols toaldehydes and carboxylic acids†Daniel Ko¨nning, Tobias Olbrisch, Fanni D. Sypaseuth, C. Christoph Tzschucke andMathias Christmann*An oxidation of allylic and benzylic alcohols to the correspondingcarboxylic acids is eﬀected by merging a Cu-catalyzed oxidationusing O2 as a terminal oxidant with a subsequent chlorite oxidation(Lindgren oxidation). The protocol was optimized to obtain pureproducts without chromatography or crystallization. Interceptionat the aldehyde stage allowed for Z/E-isomerization, thus renderingthe oxidation stereoconvergent with respect to the configuration ofthe starting material.The direct oxidation of primary alcohols to their correspondingcarboxylic acids is an important synthetic transformation that consistsof two successive steps.1 While the first step (alcohol to aldehyde) isusually performed with an electrophilic oxidant, the second oxidation(aldehyde to carboxylic acid) often involves a nucleophilic attack ofthe oxidant. Alternatively, it is possible to intercept the aldehyde–hydrate equilibrium with an electrophilic oxidant (Scheme 1). Thelatter strategy requires a significant population of the hydrate,2 whichis not very favorable in the case of aromatic aldehydes.3Alcohol-to-carboxylic-acid oxidations can be conducted eitherin a one-pot fashion or as a two-step procedure with isolation ofthe intermediate aldehyde. Classical one-pot methods involvechromium-,4 tungsten-5 or ruthenium-based6 oxidants as well ashypervalent iodine derivatives such as IBX.7 The Zhao-modification8of Anelli’s oxidation9 (TEMPO, NaClO2) constitutes another alter-native but also has some drawbacks and, like the other abovementioned oxidants, may give rise to unwanted side reactions.An elegant solution to these problems has been provided by usingoxoammonium salts in combination with NaClO2.10 For sensitivesubstrates however, a two-step protocol is often preferred over the one-pot process using a mild oxidant (e.g. Dess–Martin periodinane11) forthe initial oxidation to the aldehyde followed by Lindgren oxidation12(NaClO2 as the oxidant) to give the desired carboxylic acid.We recently investigated13 the stereoconvergent conversionof E- and Z-allylic alcohols into E-a,b-unsaturated aldehydesfollowing in the footsteps of Semmelhack,14 Sheldon,15 Marko´,16Koskinen,17 and Stahl18 (Scheme 2). Our studies resulted ina protocol using 1 mol% CuIOTf/TEMPO/diMeObpy and DMAP(2 mol%) in acetonitrile as the solvent with oxygen as stoichio-metric oxidant.DMAP was shown to play an active role in both the oxidationreaction and the isomerization steps.19 Herein, we report atwo-step one-pot conversion of E- and Z-allylic alcohols intoE-a,b-unsaturated carboxylic acids by joining a further refinedCu/TEMPO-catalyzed aerobic oxidation protocol31,32 withLindgren’s oxidation.Scheme 1 Oxidation pathways of alcohols and aldehydes to carboxylicacids.Scheme 2 Development of Cu-catalyzed aerobic oxidation.Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universita¨t Berlin, Takustr. 3,14195 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: m.christmann@fu-berlin.de;Fax: +49 30 838460182; Tel: +49 30 83860182† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental details andspectroscopic data for all compounds. See DOI: 10.1039/c4cc01305kReceived 19th February 2014,Accepted 21st March 2014DOI: 10.1039/c4cc01305kwww.rsc.org/chemcommChemCommCOMMUNICATIONOpen Access Article. Published on 26 March 2014. Downloaded on 11/03/2015 07:39:54.  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence.View Article OnlineView Journal  | View IssueThis journal is©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 5014--5016 | 5015The goal in the first oxidation step (alcohol to aldehyde) was tolower the catalyst loading as much as possible in order to minimizeinterference with the subsequent steps. Our starting point was builtupon important findings from Sheldon, Koskinen and Stahl. Sheldonfound the accelerating eﬀect of 2,20-bipyridine (bpy) ligands whileKoskinen’s careful kinetic studies17 established optimal ratios withinthe catalyst system. Recently, Stahl et al.demonstrated the importanceof CuI salts18 supported by mechanistic investigations. As a key resultin their subsequent mechanistic studies,20 aliphatic primary21and secondary alcohols22 showed a clearly diﬀerent behaviorfrom allylic and benzylic primary alcohols.33With our substrates limited to allylic and benzylic alcohols,we considered it necessary to re-evaluate CuI salts together withsymmetrically (1) and newly synthesized23 unsymmetricallysubstituted bpy ligands (2–3). Using 4a as test substrate, wefound that 0.5 mol% CuI or slightly more reactive CuBr and1 mol% DMAP resulted in a quantitative conversion of thesubstrate within 3 h, whereas reactions using Cu(OTf) and CuClwere not complete within 5 h.In order to compare the eﬃcacies of diﬀerent bpy derivatives, wefurther lowered the catalyst loading to 0.4 mol% CuBrligandTEMPOand 0.8 mol% DMAP. The reaction using the parent 2,20-bipyridinestopped at 70% conversion after 6 h. Ligand 1 aﬀorded 90%conversion whereas the unsymmetrically substituted bipyridines 2and 3 led to a quantitative conversion, with 3 being significantlyfaster than 2. Despite these encouraging results, we selected0.75 mol% CuBrbpyTEMPO and 1.5 mol% DMAP in MeCN(0.75 M) as our standard protocol for practical reasons, since weconsider these reagents to be inexpensive and in stock in mostorganic laboratories.As shown in Table 1, the oxidation of alcohols relevant to oursynthetic endeavoura proceeded smoothly with TBS (4a), Ac (4b)and Bn (4c) protecting groups. The diﬀerence in the rate ofoxidation is negligible, while the rate of the Z/E-isomerization isstrongly dependent on the substitution of the Michael acceptoraldehyde. For substrates 4d–4f, the catalyst loading was increased to1mol% inorder to ensure complete oxidation. Inorder to accelerate theZ/E-isomerization (entries 4, 5 and 7) 9-azajulolidine,24 a more nucleo-philic analogue of 4-DMAP was used. The low yield of volatile aldehyde5e reflects the difficulties associated with its distillative purification. Theoxidationof furfuryl alcohol 4h and thebenzyl alcohols 4i–j afforded thecorresponding aldehydes in moderate to excellent yields. With thisprotocol in hand, we next turned our attention to the development of aone-pot oxidation of the alcohols 4a–j to the corresponding carboxylicacids. The Lindgren oxidation of aldehydes to the correspondingcarboxylic acids with sodium chlorite is a straightforward reaction.However, the formation of the stronger oxidant hypochlorite as the by-product is often a source of side-reactions. As a result, a variety ofhypochlorite scavengers25 such as 2-methyl-2-butene26,27 have been inuse. In order to avoid by-products that are soluble in organic solventsand allow for the isolation of the clean carboxylic acids by extraction, weselectedH2O2 as a scavenger that was previously used by Dalcanale andMontanari.28 Since oxidation of 4a with NaClO2/H2O2 has been carriedout in acetonitrile as the solvent by Sorensen et al. in their hirsutellonestudies,29 we were confident of combining both subsequent oxidationsteps in a one-pot procedure.As shown in Table 2, after formation of the E-a,b-unsaturatedaldehydes, a Lindgren oxidation was conducted without priorisolation of the aldehydes. The corresponding carboxylic acidswere obtained in high purity and good to excellent yields withoutfurther chromatographic purification.30 Furfuryl alcohol was theonly problematic substrate in both oxidations. Skipping theisolation of the intermediate volatile aldehyde 5e resulted in aclean conversion of 4e into carboxylic acid 6e and a higher yield(compared to 5e).Table 1 Oxidation of alcohols to aldehydesEntry Alcohol Aldehyde t [h] [%]a1 2.5 992 1.75 923 4 984b,c 25 895b,c 18 636b 17 977c 16.5 988 6 559 1 8410 1 96a Isolated yield. b 1 mol% catalyst loading. c 9-Azajulolidine was usedinstead of DMAP.Communication ChemCommOpen Access Article. Published on 26 March 2014. Downloaded on 11/03/2015 07:39:54.  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence.View Article Online5016 | Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 5014--5016 This journal is©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014In conclusion, we have developed an inexpensive system forthe aerobic oxidation of allylic and benzylic alcohols to thecorresponding aldehydes and carboxylic acids. For the firsttime, submol% quantities of a CuI catalyst were suﬃcient forconverting alcohols into the corresponding aldehydes. Thesubsequent oxidation to the corresponding carboxylic acidswas performed in the same reaction vessel, thereby avoidingisolation of the labile aldehydes. The carboxylic acids wereisolated by extraction with suﬃcient purity without the needfor further chromatographic purification thus rendering thisprotocol both cost and time eﬃcient.References1 J.-E. Ba¨ckvall, Modern oxidation methods, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,Germany, 2nd edn, 2010.2 A.-K. C. Schmidt and C. B. W. Stark, Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 4164.3 J. C. Qiu, P. P. Pradhan, N. B. Blanck, J. M. Bobbitt and W. F. Bailey,Org. Lett., 2012, 14, 350.4 K. Bowden, I. M. Heilbron, E. R. H. Jones and B. C. L. Weedon,J. Chem. Soc., 1946, 39.5 R. Noyori, M. Aoki and K. Sato, Chem. Commun., 2003, 1977.6 M. Schro¨der and W. P. Griﬃth, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1979, 58.7 A. Schulze and A. Giannis, Synthesis, 2006, 257.8 M. Zhao, J. Li, E. Mano, Z. Song, D. M. Tschaen, E. J. J. Grabowskiand P. J. Reider, J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64, 2564.9 P. L. Anelli, C. Biﬃ, F. Montanari and S. Quici, J. Org. Chem., 1987,52, 2559.10 M. Shibuya, T. Sato, M. Tomizawa and Y. Iwabuchi, Chem. Commun.,2009, 1739.11 D. B. Dess and J. C. Martin, J. Org. Chem., 1983, 48, 4155.12 B. O. Lindgren and T. Nilsson, Acta Chem. Scand., 1973, 27, 888.13 D. Ko¨nning, W. Hiller and M. Christmann, Org. Lett., 2012,14, 5258.14 M. F. Semmelhack, C. R. Schmid, D. A. Cortes and C. S. Chou,J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1984, 106, 3374.15 R. A. Sheldon, I. W. C. E. Arends, G.-J. ten Brink and A. Dijksman,Acc. Chem. Res., 2002, 35, 774.16 I. E. Marko´, A. Gautier, R. Dumeunier, K. Doda, F. Philippart,S. M. Brown and C. J. Urch, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 1588.17 E. T. T. Kumpulainen and A. M. P. Koskinen, Chem. – Eur. J., 2009,15, 10901.18 J. M. Hoover and S. S. Stahl, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 16901.19 G. E. Keck, E. P. Boden and S. A. Mabury, J. Org. Chem., 1985,50, 709.20 J. M. Hoover, B. L. Ryland and S. S. Stahl, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013,135, 2357.21 J. E. Steves and S. S. Stahl, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 15742.22 M. B. Lauber and S. S. Stahl, ACS Catal., 2013, 2612.23 S. Duric and C. C. Tzschucke, Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 2310.24 I. Held, S. Xu and H. Zipse, Synthesis, 2007, 1185.25 A. Raach and O. Reiser, J. Prakt. Chem., 2000, 342, 605.26 G. A. Kraus and M. J. Taschner, J. Org. Chem., 1980, 45, 1175.27 G. A. Kraus and B. Roth, J. Org. Chem., 1980, 45, 4825.28 E. Dalcanale and F. Montanari, J. Org. Chem., 1986, 51, 567.29 S. D. Tilley, K. P. Reber and E. J. Sorensen, Org. Lett., 2009,11, 701.30 The NMR spectra of the carboxylic acids shown in the ESI† wererecorded on the crude material obtained after extractive workup.31 For a review on aerobic oxidations with stable radicals, see: Q. Cao,L. M. Dornan, L. Rogan, N. L. Hughes and M. J. Muldoon,Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, DOI: 10.1039/C3CC47081D.32 For a review on aerobic Cu-catalyzed reactions, see: S. E. Allen,R. R. Walvoord, R. Padilla-Salinas and M. C. Kozlowski, Chem. Rev.,2013, 113, 6234.33 Recently, the substrate scope was further extended to amino alco-hols: Y. Sasano, S. Nagasawa, M. Yamazaki, M. Shibuya, J. Park andY. Iwabuchi, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 3236.Table 2 Oxidation of alcohols to carboxylic acidsEntry Alcohol Carboxylic acid t1 [h] t2 [h] [%]a1 3 6.25 932 3 6.75 863 5 6 974b,c 15 19 945b,c 16 12 826b 15 12 957c 13 9 958 5 8.5 539 1 1.25 9510 1 9 96a Isolated yield. b 1 mol% catalyst loading. c 9-Azajulolidine was usedinstead of DMAP.ChemComm CommunicationOpen Access Article. Published on 26 March 2014. Downloaded on 11/03/2015 07:39:54.  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence.View Article Online

https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/bitstream/fub188/14695/1/c4cc01305k.pdf

Oxidation of allylic and benzylic alcohols to aldehydes and carboxylic acids

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Crossref

Institutional Repository of the Freie Universität Berlin