The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach for Assessment of Regional
Environmental Sustainability
Authors
Publication date
1 January 2012
Publisher
Doi
Abstract
Environment has had a relatively low priority in Turkey. Environmental
concerns have been too often superseded by development interest in local
decision-making. Strengthened environmental efforts from national government,
provincial authorities, and municipalities are required to achieve
environmental convergence with the European Union. Despite progress in
providing environmental statistics and indicators, the need for integrated
studies on environmental sustainability both national and subnational levels
is still urgent. The objective of this study is to measure and compare
environmental sustainability at sub-national level by using AHP. The proposed
model is implemented both the selected sub-regions (NUTS 2 level) and their
provinces (NUTS 3 level). In the analysis, SuperDecisions software v.2.2.1 is
used and two alternative groups are evaluated according to eleven criteria
namely, population density, energy consumption, green area, land use, total
disposal, non-treated wastewater, water consumption, number of cars, traffic
accidents, SO2 and PM10 emissions. The results indicate that at NUTS 2 level,
İstanbul (TR10) the largest city in Turkey with 18% of total population and
also one of the most populated cities in Europe is ranked (0.267133) first out
of five. İstanbul is followed by regions TR42 Kocaeli, Sakarya, Düzce, Bolu,
Yalova (0.189030) and TR41 Bursa, Eskişehir, Bilecik (0.186964) while TR21
Tekirdağ, Edirne, Kırklareli (0.170595) is rated as the least environmentally
sustainable region. On the other hand, at NUTS 3 level TR424 Bolu has the
highest ranking (0.132935), followed by TR412 Eskişehir (0.121052) and TR413
Bilecik (0.088625). The least environmentally sustainable provinces are TR211
Tekirdağ (0.046646) and TR421Kocaeli (0.037254), respectively. TR100 İstanbul
(0.051545) is ranked 11th out of 14