Ali, Mariyam

Federwisch, Luisa

Owsianowski, Nils

Richter, Claudio

Electronic Publication Information Center

Environmental and biological controls of glass sponges around the Discovery Islands, British Columbia, Canada  Introduction & Objective  Glass sponges (Porifera, Hexactinellida) are characteristically deep water animals, and they are mostly found in depth range of 300-600 m1. In only few locations worldwide, including coastal waters of the northeast Pacific, they are found in shallower waters3. Glass sponges have significant ecological roles in constructing benthic habitats4. Because of their spiky texture and questionable palatability they seem an unlikely prey. However there are reports of predation of glass sponges by sea stars (incl. Ceramaster sp) and dorid nudibranchs5,6. This research aims to investigate reasons for the occurrence of glass sponges around the Discovery Islands by evaluating impacts of environmental and biological factors.      BREMERHAVEN  Am Alten Hafen 26 27568 Bremerhaven Germany www.awi.de References 1 Leys SP, Mackie GO, Reiswig HM. 2007. The biology of glass sponges. Advances Marine Biology 52:1-145. 2 Leys SP, Wilson K, Holeton C, Reiswig HM, Austin WC. Tunnicliffe V. 2004. Patterns of glass sponge (Porifera, Hexactinellida) distribution in coastal waters of British Columbia. Canada. Marine Ecology Progress Series 283: 133–149.  3 Chu JWF, Leys SP. 2010. High resolution mapping of community structure in three glass sponge reefs (Porifera, Hexactinellida). Marine Ecology Progress Series 417: 97-113. 4 McClintock JB, Amsler CD, Baker BJ, Van Soest RWM. 2005. Ecology of Antarctic marine sponges: an overview. Integrated Computer Biology 45: 359–368.  5 McDaniel N. 2013. Sea stars of the Pacific Northwest. Retrieved from http://www.seastarsofthepacificnorthwest.info/species/cookie_star.html 6 Chu JWF, Leys SP. 2012. The dorid nudibranchs Peltodoris lentiginosa and Archidoris odhneri as predators of glass sponges. Invertebrate Biology 131: 75-81. Mariyam Ali, Luisa Federwisch, Nils Owsianowski, Claudio Richter Mariyam Ali M.Sc Marine Biology Student Bremen University  Biosciences | Bentho-Pelagic Processes AWI Contact: mariyamali7@ymail.com  Results Method  Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) was used to map the distribution of glass sponges and other benthic biota at the five stations of Orford Bay, Bute Inlet East, Maurelle Island, Penn Islands, and Mitlenatch Island in the Discovery Islands archipelago. Data from altimeter which was mounted on a camera (measuring its distance to the substrate) was used to calculate the area, and data for temperature, oxygen, salinity and Chl a were obtained from CTD measurements. Individual sponge oscula, were counted as a water processing units, as it is very difficult to determine individuals in the abundance of oscula from a glass sponge3. Temperature (°C)  Salinity Oxygen (μmol/kg)  Depth m Stations coordinates, depth, and area information Environmental parameters: Temperature, Salinity, Oxygen, Chl a, and biological parameters: Abundance of glass sponges species and Sea star Ceramaster  sp Conclusions A-C: Vertical profiles of environmental parameters; D and E: Horizontal profiles of glass sponges species and sea star (Ceramaster sp) abundance in the water column at the five stations (according to the rainbow color code of red: Orford Bay; orange: Bute Inlet East; yellow: Maurelle Island; green: Penn Islands and blue: Mitlenatch Island) around Discovery Islands. The blue dotted lines show the common depth range of (24-130 m) at the five stations.  Occurrence of glass sponges in these areas is probably governed by bottom up control.  Primary production and flux of food from surface might be a contributing factor.  Predation does not seem to have big impact on occurrence of glass sponges. © Luisa Federwisch, AWI 2014 Osculum Maps of the study area. (A) BC fjords where, presence of glass sponges was reported (map taken from Leys et al. 2004) 2, (B) our studied area around the Discovery Islands. Stations are colored in rainbow color code; red-blue indicates inshore to offshore location of stations. Glass sponges (oscula/m2) Ceramaster sp (Ind/m2) ©Claudio Richter and Nils Owsianowski, AWI 2013  ROV           Ceramaster sp           Aphrocallistes vastus    Rhabdocalyptus dawsoni    Heterochone calyx               Abundance  (oscula/m2)  Orford     Bute    Maurelle   Penn   Mitlenatch   Comparison of correlation coefficients (rho) between environmental, biological parameters and occurrence of glass sponges (24 – 130 m). Comparison of the environmental parameters range for occurrence of glass sponges (24 – 130 m)  Abundance  (Ind/m2)  Chl a  (g/m2) C B A D E G F H Environmental Parameters range Orford Bay station Mean±SD Bute Inlet East station Mean±SD Maurelle Island station Mean±SD Penn Islands station Mean±SD Mitlenatch Island station Mean±SD Depth (m) 67.93±29.14 78.16±26.27 81.45 ±24.64 81.17±26.98 70.50±30.44 Temperature (°C) 8.86±0.21 8.82±0.23 8.93±0.45   8.81±0.43 9.12±0.71 Salinity  29.74±0.51 30.03±0.35 29.79±0.49 29.89±0.41 29.85±0.44 Density (kg/m3) 23.04±0.43 23.27±0.30 23.06±0.45 23.16±0.38 23.08±0.45 Oxygen (μmol/kg) 93.90±15.45 98.25±6.64 109.01±9.28 105.39±9.69 120.63±12.22 Chl a (mg/m3) 0.03±0.03 0.07±0.05 0.12±0.10 0.07±0.08 0.04±0.03 Environmental & Biological parameters Orford Bay station Bute Inlet East station Maurelle Island station Penn Islands station Mitlenatch Island station Depth (m) 0.13 0.29 0.19 0.21 0.21 Temperature (°C) 0.04 0.31 0.17 0.21 0.18 Salinity  0.11 0.31 0.13 0.22 0.17 Density (kg/m3) 0.10 0.31 0.14 0.22 0.17 Oxygen (μmol/kg) 0.16 0.30 0.17 0.24 0.17 Chl a (mg/m3) -0.00 0.33 0.15 0.27 0.17 ©Claudio Richter and Nils Owsianowski, AWI 2013  ©Claudio Richter and Nils Owsianowski, AWI 2013  ©Claudio Richter and Nils Owsianowski, AWI 2013  ©Claudio Richter and Nils Owsianowski, AWI 2013  Comparison of the mean abundance of sea star Ceramaster sp (F), glass sponges (oscula) (G), and Chl a  (24-130 m). No sea star was seen in Orford station. Chl a shows highest value in Maurelle station where glass sponges had highest abundance. There was not any significant difference between the abundance of Ceramaster sp in four stations. Abundance of A. vastus was significantly higher than the abundance of other glass sponges, and Chl a was significantly higher in Maurelle station. Error bars show standard errors.    Temperature, salinity, oxygen, Chl a range was 8.31-10.21 °C, 28.86-30.52, 68.51-140.75 μmol/kg, and 0.11-0.36 mg/m3 respectively in 24-130 m.  Highest abundance of glass sponges oscula was seen at Maurelle station.   Presence of sea star Ceramaster sp showed very small correlation with occurrence of all glass sponges and their absence at Orford Bay station might be caused by sea star wasting disease (SSWD).  Combination effect of depth, oxygen and Chl a showed relatively moderate correlation with occurrence of all glass sponges in the whole studied area.      A B Depth, Chl a, and oxygen showed higher correlation (bold figures) with occurrence of glass sponges.  

Environmental and biological controls of glass sponges around the Discovery Islands, British Columbia, Canada

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Electronic Publication Information Center