This journal writing discusses about the legal issue relating to the notary responsibility toward the omission of minuta deed as a part of notary protocol, in which according to article 16 paragraph (1) letter b Act Of The Republic Of Indonesia Number 2 Year 2014 About The Change Toward Act Of The Republic Of Indonesia Number 30 Year 2004 About Notary Office (UUJN), which explained notary has duty to save deed in the form of minuta. The purpose of this study is to analyze about the capability or incapability of the notary which is responsible criminally and intentionally omits the minuta deed which constitutes a part of notary protocol. The research method used in this journal writing namely juridical normative with statue approach, historical approach, and conceptual approach. The result of this journal is when the notary are proved validly and ensure doing omission of minuta deed which is subjected with criminal sanction. Related to the criminal decision is not arranged in UUJN, it is because UUJN just focuses itself about discussing administrative sanction and only civil. Meanwhile, the form of responsibility criminally refers to Act Of The Republic Of Indonesia Number 43 Year 2009 About The Archivement
