research

Comparative Study between the Theory of Adequate Causation and Objective Imputation

Abstract

我国早已摒弃偶然因果关系说与必然因果关系说。条件理论不能圆满地解决无限追溯的缺陷,同时在择一因果关系、假设的因果关系等方面也不能自圆其说。诸如条件说那样刻意地为了弥补自身的缺陷而创立的补充规则本身就否定了客观上存在的因果关系,故而是不可取的。但是我们又不能完全否认条件理论的价值,相当因果关系理论和客观归责理论都是以构成要件行为与构成要件结果之间存在条件关系为前提,之后的逻辑进路才发生重大变化。相当因果关系理论中的主观说基本上已经遭到学者们的弃用,客观说与折中说仍处于相互竞争的态势。相当因果关系理论极大地弥补了条件理论的不足,遗憾的是,相当关系理论的判断标准模糊不清,对异常因果的过滤功能较为低下...Our country has already been rejected by accident causation and the inevitable cause-and-effect relationship. Conditions theory can't solve the defect of infinite traces, successfully at the same time in choosing a causal relationship, also cannot justify assumes that the causal relationship, Such as condition of said deliberately in order to make up for the defect of its own and create additional...学位:法学硕士院系专业:法学院_刑法学学号:1362014115017

    Similar works