The purpose of this article is to develop a framework useful for a systematic
discussion of the theoretical and methodological problems in international comparative
research. In the author's opinion, such a framework may primarily serve as an instrument to a) classify the main types of international comparative research
and to b) make an inventory of the main theoretical, methodological and
practical problems in this field.
The author first comments on two classifications of comparative research that
were developed by Scheuch and Smelser and next he presents a more comprehensive
framework that is more appropriate to the situation of theoretical and methodological
pluralism in the social sciences.
The classification proposed by the author is made by looking at the main
theoretical perspectives or paradigms which are based on fundamental differences
regarding the subject-matter of sociology. The author opposes catascopic and
anascopic approaches, the approaches conceiving the reality as „objective" or „intersubjective",
consensus and conflict approaches, synchronic and diacronie approaches,
and continuous and discontinuous changes approaches. In addition, the
author distinguishes other differences, e.g. cultural level and social-structural level
approaches and draws conclusions concerning, among other, the goal of international
comparative research.Digitalizacja i deponowanie archiwalnych zeszytów RPEiS sfinansowane przez MNiSW w ramach realizacji umowy nr 541/P-DUN/201