We give a rigorous characterization of what it means for a programming
language to be memory safe, capturing the intuition that memory safety supports
local reasoning about state. We formalize this principle in two ways. First, we
show how a small memory-safe language validates a noninterference property: a
program can neither affect nor be affected by unreachable parts of the state.
Second, we extend separation logic, a proof system for heap-manipulating
programs, with a memory-safe variant of its frame rule. The new rule is
stronger because it applies even when parts of the program are buggy or
malicious, but also weaker because it demands a stricter form of separation
between parts of the program state. We also consider a number of pragmatically
motivated variations on memory safety and the reasoning principles they
support. As an application of our characterization, we evaluate the security of
a previously proposed dynamic monitor for memory safety of heap-allocated data.Comment: POST'18 final versio
