The remedies in respect of an offense that often typically received less attention is the protection of objects confiscated or evidence of a criminal process. Of a series of criminal justice process from the level of investigation, prosecution and up to the judge\u27s decision must include evidence that the defendant used in committing a crime. In order to evidence and secure the spoils of the State and the integrity required of a special institution to save the State Foreclosure Home Storage Objects (RUPBASAN) any institution authorized Act - legislation to implement the storage of confiscated items and loot the country. Problems in this paper is how the shape of objects confiscated and the protection of the State of booty and how the process of execution against the State confiscated objects, whereas the purpose of this paper is intended to answer questions - questions contained in the subject matter is to determine the protection of objects confiscated and State booty and to learn about the process of execution of confiscated items and loot the State. This study uses a normative juridical approach of juridical and empirical use of primary data, secondary data and tertiary data. Some fakor lack of protection for confiscated items and loot the State due to storage, research, and securing a less responsible. Efforts to protect objects of booty seized and the State in the criminal justice process is important because it has the function to strengthen the confidence of judges in assessing the truth of the material and formal errors also complete the accused and the evidence that has been defined by the Regulation