Brierley, W. G.. (1953). Orchard Studies: Axillary Fruit Buds on Some Apple Varieties in Minnesota. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/188220

Brierley, W. G.

University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy

--ii ( ORCHARD STUDIES: AXILLARY FRUIT BUDS ON SOME APPLE VARIETIES IN MINNESOTA W.G. BRIERLEY, DEPARTMENT OF HORTICULTURE .UNIVERSITY FARM, S'J.'. PAUL l MINNESOTA MAY 1953 The axillary fruit buds sometimes occur on apple yarieties and spe~ies was noted long ago by Gourley ( 2, 3) and others:~ B;rierl.ey (1) mor~ recently commented . ~~~ I qn t~Jis}\s~udy of the clustering habit of Haralson, Minjon and ·Wealthy\\ These buds are found commonly, also, on HRosy-Bloom11 Crab~pples and contribute materially to the mass of ornamental blossoms produced. Normal fruit buds of the apple are found at the tip~ of short year-old $pur~~ or on short year-old branches of older spurs. Some v~rieties commonly form fru:L t. buds. ~l$0 .at the tips of the new terminal. · . . shoots.· Axillary. buds are reported-as occurring .on vigorous year ... old shoots of trees grown under irrigation in western s.tates.- Axil,lary fruit buds usually develop their · blossoms a little later than the typical terminal spur buds. Often, in Minnesota these ·buds are weak and do not set fruit~ but when they do,_a h:i,.gh percentage of the apples produced usually is of unmar~etable small si~e, poorly colored and_adds to the undesirable habit of 11 ropingn (1) 0 Occurance of axillary !rui t b"t).ds has a direct bearing· upon the chemical thin-\ ning p~oblemQ As these buds usually bloom a little later than spur buds the blossoms are not satisfactorily thinned by blossom thinning sprays of Elget~l or Kreniteo Also, :because later blossoming results in somewhat shorter time for fruit develop-ment, and because there usually is·. a smaller numbe~ of adjacent leaves to proyide foods for growth, the apples ~ualAY are small and poorly colored at harvest timeo , Thinning with naphtAale~eacetic acid (N.A.A.) sprays seems to remove much of the ax~lla~ set and thus helps to reduce the percen~age of small apples. The. occurrance of axillary-fruit buds on some Minnesota apple varieties was first observed when a study of the clustering habit was carri~d on from 1937 to ' 1944 Ct}Q No records of' axillary buds were made in .. 1946 when frost destroyed all '-blossoms. In 1948 and ,1950 "off .... yearsn followi~g y~ars of heavy crops, no axillary buds were found. Trees in good vigor· in an noff~year11 tend to develop many more axillar.y fruit buds than are formed ~n years of heayy crops. Axillar,y frnit buds usually are found on vigorous, more or less upright, year old shoots. These buds are larger·and plumper than leaf buds. There is no spur formation until the blossoiTB and leaves· appear. A succulent new· spur growth begins with the unfolding of the bud ·and may grow to a length of an inch or more. This growth .should not be confused with normal young spurs which grow the previous season·and therefore the normal spurs I are formed on two-year~old wood, In 1947 several varieties commonlf grown in Minnesota were rated according to the average number of axillar,v fruit buds founq per ~hoot. No record was made of shoots not showing these buds. The yariety rRtings are shown in Table 1. No axillar,y fruit buds were found that year· o~ Minjon. ~hey were ra!e on Fireside, Me-Intosh and Redwell, si~gle buds being found on only an occassional shoot. On Hibernal Patten, Oriole a~d Prairie Spy from three to five axilla~ fruit·buds were found on vigorous shootsc A ver,y heavy development of these buds was found on Erickson, ' / Haralson, Northwestern and Wealthy. On these varieti~s, shoots of average vigor · showed from three-to five of these buds,, but there were rna~ very vigorous upright shoot on which 12 to 14 axillary fruit buds were counted • .... In l949 only the Haralson and Wealthy varieties were studied. On 12 inch long terminal shoots of Haralson from seven to nine axillary buds were commonly found in addition to the normal fruit buds at tips of the shoots. As the blossoms appeared the terminal buds produced up to seven or eight flower.s and the axillary buds pro-duced up to six or seven flowers. These terminal shootg were completely covered by the mass of blossoms, Most of the old spurs on these trees had been killed in the severe winter of 1947~48o Loss of these spurs, a.nd the c:rop they might have produced, may have resulted in an extra s~pply of foods for the axillary and terminAl buds on the shoots which grew in 1948~-On vigorous upright shoots of Wealthy three to nine_ axilla~J fruit buds were found in addition to the plump termin~l buds. These fruit buds commonly produced up \ to seven or eight flowers making a total of 30 to $0 blossoms to a 12 inch shooto -3-'tmtell':!~e'denoo:bhB.@i~h"t .61:owers~developed from a single. bud .m~y flower stems · were branched so that t~o or three flowers were. supported by a single stem. This type of flower development was not found in the Haralson, but was very common in Minjon, a variety in 'Which cl uste~s of five to seven apples ar.e not unusual~ There was a relatively heavy pet of apples· fro:rp. axillary fruit buds in 1949 •. On beth Wealthy and Haralson these ht:tds ·colTU'Q.only produced clusters of two to six apples wnich remained attac~ed until harvest, timeg· In 1951 records were made on several. ·varieties following th~ 11 off-yearn of 1950. N~ attempt was made to determine the percentage ·of ·.shoots on which axillary fruit budt were formed. But a large number of shoots was. examined on each tree to detect those on which axillary buds had been formed. The range in number of axillar.y buds found, and the mean number per shoot were recorded as an indication of variety habit. The_.figures obtained are shown in Table 2. This table shows the number' of·trees examined, the total number of shoots on which axillar.y fruit buds were found, the range in number of these buds, and ·the mean number ·Of .buds per shoot. No axillary fruit buds were fmund on Mcintosh, and they were found on only a few shoots of Lakeland, 0Piole and Minjono On the other varietie,s shown in Table 2 axillary fruit buds were common. The figures shown in Table 2 suggest that there is little or no relatio'nship between the habit of developing axillar.y fruit buds and the habit of clustering in the. set of apples per spur~ In l1injon:, axillary fruit buds are not commonly found, but its clustering,habit is pronounced. Axillar.y fruit buds commonly are found on Beacon, Redwe~l and Northwestern, but clustering is not a problem in those varieties e . In 1952 locally grown varieties were again studied. The same procedure was followed as in 1951 a~d the figures obtained are ·shown in Table 3. Only a very·few shooots of iireside, Mcintosh, Oriole ·and Prairie Spy showed. any axillary buds,· so these varieties are not incrluded in 1'able 3o Axillary fruit buds' were common on •--;.: Wealthy and Harals~n as in previous seasons,- and in 1952 they were common on Lake-land and Redwell. It is apparent from this study that axillary buds are not rare among our locally grown apple ,varieties and under conditions prevailing in Minnesota. The wide variation- in occurrance of these buds apparently is related to variations in tree vigor as few were found on shoots that grew in years of heav.y crops. When tree J vigor is built up by. favorable weather in an 11 of.f-year 11 axillary fruit buds have I been found in varying numbers on almost all of the apple varieties commonly grown in Minnesota. However, the performapce of Wealthy and,Haralson suggest that develop-ment of axillary fruit buds is_ also a yariety habit. On Mcintosh, Fireside, Oriole, and Minjon relatively few of these buds· ar~ formed~ -and their f.ormation sePms to be more cas.ual than habitual. Although formation of axillary fruit buds does not seem to be related to the clustering _habit it_ is evident that formation of a relatively large number of axillary fruit buds in one season may add to the fruit thinning problem ·in the following season. Even if ·axillary fruit buds often do not set, and although they are relatively weak, a grower should be able to recognize them. If they do set and are not ch')lmically thinned they contribute materially to "roping" and add considera-bly to the percentage of small, pooriy colored apples at harvest time. Fortunately axillar.y .buds are weaker than normal spur buds and well managed chemical thinning should remove most of their set. It is obvious, also, that the occurrance of several axillary fruit buds on new shoots interferes materially with the development of normal spurs with typical ter-minal fruit buds when these shoots go into their second-year. Normally some of the leaf buds on year-old shoots develop in the second year into typical short spurs with terminal fruit buds. Varieties that bear annual crops usually behave in that way. BlQssoming or-set of axillary buds prevents development of normal spurs at .those nodes •. A:Lso, the spurs formed during development of axillary buds are too weak to form normal fruit buds the same season. It seems likely that this upset of normal fruiting hapit by the formation of axillary. fruit buds may contribute materi~ ally t~ the marked biennial fruiting habit of Wealt~ and Haralson. This study suggests that a commercial grower should examine his trees carefully during the early stage of blossoming and plan f~r an especially thorough program of chemical thinning if he finds m~ny axillary fruit buds in a year of heavy bloom follo~ing an ttoff-year" •. Weal thy and Ha'ralson seem to need particular attention because of their ·common habit of forming axillatY fruit buds. ~ ~ ,... - -.. -~ .... -· ... - ~ - - -\ Literature Citations· 1. Brierley, W.G. "The clustering J:tabtt -61 Hara~sbn, Minjon and 'VITealthy Applesn. Proc •. Am. Soc. !fort. Sci. 50:17-20. 1947' Also Minnes~ta Horticulturist. Vol. 73:74-75 •. May 1945. 2.·Gourley, JeH. 11 Studies in fruit bud formationn N.H. Agri. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bul.. 9. 1915. ttFruit bud formation - a criticism" Torrey Bot .Club./ 44: 455-457. 1911. Table 1. Axillar,v Fruit Buds On Some _ CC?mmon·-~pple Varieties in 1947 .Rating on basis· of buds found per shoot 1. Absent 2, . Rare; l _on an ·occassional shoot,. 3; Few:. 1 to· 2 per v;i.gorous ·shoot 4, Moderate: 3·to 5 per vigorous ·s~oot 5o Heavy: 5 to 7 per vigorous shoot I 6 11. Very Heavy: '8 to 10 or more per· vigo~ous shoot •. ·. · Varieties Minjon Fire$ide, Mcintosh? Redwell . ··} . Peerless _Hibernal, Orio:t,.e, Pattep, Prairie Spy · Erickson,·Haralson, North-· westernl•, Wealthy_ •. . _\ V.suall~ moder~te 1 but·very heav,y on· vigorous upr~ght shoots. \ Variety Trees No. Table 2. Axillary Fruit Buds On Some Coramon Apple Varieties in 1951 Shoots No9 Range in number -of buds per shoot Axillary buds not common Maintosh 10 0 0 Lakeland 4 4 1 to 2 Oriole 4 17 l·to 3 Minjon 11 21 1 to 6 Axillary buds common Duchess 6 31 1 to 7 Beacon 8 34 / l to 9 Fireside 8 49 1 to 11 Northwestern 5 46 l to 8 Redwell, 7 Prairie Spy 8 32 1 to 9 J$ 1 to 12 Wealthy 40 42 3 to 13 Haralson 32 46 2 to 14 Mean No. buds per shoot 0 1.71 ±•13 2,43 ±.58 2,81±.'25 3 ~ 71 ± ~68 31)78 ±_ ~20 3:!96 ± ~21 4~03 ± ~23 4~60 ± .33 6e26±e02 6.L~8±~67 Variety Minjon Beacon Wealthy Lakeland1• Haralso£ Redwell 0 Trees No. 10 16 70 4 48 7 Table 3. Axilla~ Fruit Buds On Some Cammon Apple Varieties in 1952 Shoots No 4 39 44 12:8 132 157 103 Range in number o~ buds per shoot 1~.5 1-6 1-12 1-13 ·1-16 1-14 1 0 Lakeland and Redwell trees bore a· ver.r ~ight crop in l951Q Mean No, buds per shoot 2Q05± 0 11 2o7 5± g14 3~31± .15 4.02± .16 5.42± ;46 6el8 ± .24 Note: Axillary· buds were found on only·· a few ·scattered shoots of Fireside, Mcintosh, and Orioleo 

Orchard Studies: Axillary Fruit Buds on Some Apple Varieties in Minnesota

https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/188220/Orchard%20studies%20Axillary.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Orchard Studies: Axillary Fruit Buds on Some Apple Varieties in Minnesota

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy