CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Structured Debriefing and Students\u27 Clinical Judgment Abilities in Simulation
Authors
Mary Ann Cantrell
Kristina Dreifuerst
+3 more
Bette Mariani
Colleen H. Meakim
Patricia Prieto
Publication date
1 May 2013
Publisher
e-Publications@Marquette
Abstract
Background Debriefing is a critical component of clinical simulation, yet there are limited studies that demonstrate the outcomes of debriefing on learners\u27 clinical judgment. Method Using the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric, this mixed-method study examined the effects of structured debriefing after 2 clinical simulation experiences on 86 junior-level baccalaureate nursing students\u27 clinical judgment. Debriefing for Meaningful Learning© was the method used for the structured debriefing sessions. Results The mean clinical judgment scores of the intervention group were higher and improved more over time compared with the mean scores of those in the control group; however, the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions Data generated from focus group interviews suggest that students perceived the structured debriefing sessions as being learner-focused discussions that provided a holistic approach that included a review of knowledge, technical skills, and their reactions and emotions about the learning experiences
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
epublications@Marquette
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:epublications.marquette.ed...
Last time updated on 10/04/2021