CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
research
A survey of Top 200 Drugs—Inconsistent Practice of Drug Strength Expression for Drugs Containing Salt Forms
Authors
Daniel Prohotsky
Fang Zhao
Publication date
1 January 2012
Publisher
Fisher Digital Publications
Doi
Cite
Abstract
Many ionizable drugs are developed and marketed as salt forms. However, there are no clear US regulatory guidelines on drug strength labeling for salts. The strengths of some drugs are expressed as salts and some as free acids/bases. This study surveyed the top 200 US drugs to assess the common practice in industry. The top 200 drugs prescribed in the United States were included in this survey. The drugs containing active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) salts were selected for analysis. Generic or combination products with redundant API salts were excluded. The package insert of each selected drug was reviewed, and the information on drug strength expression was extracted and categorized. Out of the top 200 drugs, 59 unique API salts were identified. The drug strengths were expressed as salts for 32 drugs (54%) and as free acids/bases for 27 drugs (46%). The survey results revealed the inconsistent practice among the industries regarding the drug strength expression for salts. Non-harmonized labeling practice can lead to confusions, potential calculation/dosing errors, and complications in labeling new products. The authors recommend the US Food and Drug Administration to standardize the labeling format for salts and preferably express the drug strengths based on the free acid/base forms. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
info:doi/10.1002%2Fjps.22735
Last time updated on 23/12/2020
Fisher Digital Publications
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:fisherpub.sjf.edu:doctoral...
Last time updated on 07/10/2022