A simple synthesis of a dendritic hexaferrocenyl electron donor (5) is described in which six ferrocene moieties are connected at the vertices of the propeller of the hexaphenylbenzene core. The molecular structure of 5 is confirmed by X-ray crystallography. An electrochemical analysis along with redox titrations (which are tantamount to coulometry) confirmed that it ejects six electrons at a single potential

Chebny, Vincent J.

Dhar, Dwairath

Lindeman, Sergey V.

Rathore, Rajendra

English

epublications@Marquette

Marquette Universitye-Publications@MarquetteChemistry Faculty Research and Publications Chemistry, Department of1-1-2006Simultaneous Ejection of Six Electrons at aConstant Potential byHexakis(4-ferrocenylphenyl)benzeneVincent J. ChebnyMarquette UniversityDwairath DharMarquette UniversitySergey V. LindemanMarquette University, sergey.lindeman@marquette.eduRajendra RathoreMarquette UniversityAccepted version. Organic Letters, Vol. 8, No. 22 (2006): 5041-5044. DOI. © 2006 AmericanChemical Society. Used with permission. Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette  Chemistry Faculty Research and Publications/College of Arts and Sciences  This paper is NOT THE PUBLISHED VERSION; but the author’s final, peer-reviewed manuscript. The published version may be accessed by following the link in the citation below.  Organic Letters, Vol. 8, No. 22 (2006): 5041-5044. DOI. This article is © American Chemical Society and permission has been granted for this version to appear in e-Publications@Marquette. American Chemical Society does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from American Chemical Society.   Simultaneous Ejection of Six Electrons at a Constant Potential by Hexakis(4-ferrocenylphenyl)benzene  Vincent J. Chebny Department of Chemistry, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin Dwairath Dhar Department of Chemistry, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin Sergey V. Lindeman Department of Chemistry, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin Rajendra Rathore Department of Chemistry, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin   Abstract  A simple synthesis of a dendritic hexaferrocenyl electron donor (5) is described in which six ferrocene moieties are connected at the vertices of the propeller of the hexaphenylbenzene core. The molecular structure of 5 is confirmed by X-ray crystallography. An electrochemical analysis along with redox titrations (which are tantamount to coulometry) confirmed that it ejects six electrons at a single potential.  Design and synthesis of organic dendritic molecules containing multiple redox-active chromophores are of importance not only for the preparation of materials with novel light-emitting and charge-transport properties but also as multielectron redox catalysts.1,2 Interestingly, a simple Co2(CO)8-catalyzed trimerization of the diarylacetylenes allows an easy access to a variety of hexaarylbenzene (HAB) derivatives where the vertices of the hexaphenylbenzene core can be decorated with the desirable electro-active chromophores.3,4 Accordingly, herein, we now report the utilization of the hexaphenylbenzene core as a platform for the preparation of a multicentered electron donor that bears six redox-active ferrocenyl moieties at its vertices (see structure 5). Moreover, this hitherto unknown macromolecular electron donor 5undergoes the loss of six electrons in a single step (at a constant potential) to afford a highly charged hexacationic salt which is readily soluble in common organic solvents, such as dichloromethane, chloroform, etc. The simultaneous extraction of six electrons from hexaferrocenyl donor 5 will be delineated (i) with the aid of redox titrations using robust cation−radical salts as aromatic oxidants and (ii) by cyclic voltammetry and comparison with an internal standard, hexakis(4-methyl-2,5-dimethoxybiphenyl)benzene (1)4 a donor of similar size and shape that also ejects all of its six electrons at a potential of 1.15 V vs saturated calomel electrode (SCE).   Furthermore, the cyclic voltammeter studies presented herein allows us to emphasize5 as well as provide a solution to the problem that is often encountered when determining the number of electrons in a given cyclic voltammetric (CV) wave by using an equimolar amount of internal standards of dissimilar sizes. As shown in Scheme 1, the synthesis of 5 was accomplished via a standard three-step route. Thus, bis(4-ferrocenylphenyl)acetylene (3) was obtained by a Pd-catalyzed coupling6 of the readily available 4-ferrocenyliodobenzene7 (2) with trimethylsilylacetylene in a one-pot procedure in a 75% yield. The resulting acetylene 3 was trimerized in refluxing dioxane in the presence of a catalytic amount of Co2(CO)8 to the previously unknown hexakis(4-ferrocenylphenyl)benzene (5) in >80% isolated yield.  Scheme 1.  Synthesis of Polychromophoric Donor 5 and Model Monoferrocenyl Donors 6 and 7  Similarly, the monoferrocenyl analogue 6 was prepared by a Diels−Alder reaction of 4-ferrocenyltolan (4) with tetraphenylcyclopentadienone in refluxing diphenyl ether. The structures of these macromolecular electron donors 5 and 6 as well as tolylferrocene (7) were readily established by 1H/13C NMR spectroscopy as well as by correct elemental analysis and FAB mass spectrometry (see the Supporting Information for the experimental details). The molecular structure of hexaferrocenyl donor 5 was further confirmed by X-ray crystallography as shown in Figure 1. The following structural features of 5 are noteworthy. The propeller formed by six 4-ferrocenylphenyl arms around the central benzene ring in 5 showed that the dihedral angles between the planes of the central benzene ring and the six peripheral phenyls varied between 54.1 and 66.1° (avg 60.4°) and are similar to those observed in other hexaarylbenzene derivatives.8 Interestingly, however, the orientations of the ferrocenyl groups with respect to the peripheral phenyls are much more varied as well as the dihedral angles between the planes of phenyl and adjacent cyclopentadienyl groups, i.e., 4.3−31.2°. It is noteworthy that the cyclopentadienyl moieties of the ferrocene groups generally lie coplanar with the aryl rings in various arylferrocene derivatives; e.g., see Figure S3 and S4 in the Supporting Information.8 As such, the reason for substantial deviation from phenylcyclopentadienyl coplanarity in 5 can be attributed to effective C−H···π interactions9 among the ferrocenyl rings of different molecules in the crystals, as shown in the packing diagram in Figure 1.  Figure 1 (Top) X-ray structure of 5 showing the varied orientations of the ferrocenyl groups. (Bottom) Packing of 5 in the crystal due to effective CH−π interactions that are exemplified by the partial space-filling representations of three cyclopentadienyl moieties from two different molecules.  The hexaferrocenyl donor 5 and hexakis(4-methyl-2,5-dimethoxybiphenyl)benzene (1) were next subjected to the electrochemical oxidation at a platinum electrode as a 2 × 10-4 M solution in a (4:1) dichloromethane−acetonitrile mixture containing 0.2 M n-Bu4NPF6 as the supporting electrolyte. The cyclic voltammograms of 5 and 1 consistently met the reversibility criteria at various scan rates of 25−400 mV s-1 (see Figure 2), as they all showed cathodic/anodic peak current ratios of ia/ic = 1.0 (theoretical) as well as the differences between anodic and cathodic peak potentials of pa−pc = 68 ± 5 mV at 22 °C. The reversible oxidation potentials of 5 and 1 were calibrated with internal standards (vide infra) and were found to be 0.47 and 1.15 V vs SCE for 5and 1, respectively.  Figure 2 Cyclic voltammograms of 0.2 mM hexakis(4-ferrocenylphenyl)benzene 5 (A) and hexaarylbenzene donor 1 (B) in CH2Cl2 containing 0.2 M n-Bu4NPF6 at a scan rate of 25−400 mV s-1 at 22 °C.  It is interesting to note that irrespective of the number of the electro-active ferrocenyl (FeCp2) groups (i.e., 6 FeCp2 groups in 5 and one each in model compounds 6 and 7), these electron donors showed only a single reversible (CV) wave at a potential of 0.47 ± 0.01 V vs SCE (see Figures S1 and S2 in the Supporting Information), thus suggesting that the ferrocenyl groups in 5are not electronically coupled. In order to evaluate the number of electrons being ejected in the cyclic voltammetric peaks of 5and 1 in Figure 2, we employed 4-methyl-2,5-dimethoxytoluene (8, E1/2 = 1.15 V vs SCE) and ferrocene (E1/2 = 0.45 V vs SCE) as internal standards. For example, the square wave voltammogram of a 1:6 mixture of 5 and 8 (Figure 3A) and 1 and ferrocene (Figure 3B) were recorded in a dichloromethane−acetonitrile solution under conditions identical to those employed in Figure 2. Expectedly, both internal standards (i.e., 8 and ferrocene) showed identical currents, whereas 5 and 1 showed substantially reduced magnitudes of currents (which corresponded to the ejection of roughly 2.4 electrons from 1 and 5) in comparison to the internal standards. As such, the dissimilarity in the magnitudes of the currents in Figure 3A,B is readily reconciled by the fact that the difference in the sizes and shapes of 5 vs ferrocene and 1 vs 8 contributes to the difference in diffusion coefficients of the donors.5 Indeed, when a square-wave voltammogram of a 1:1 mixture of the two hexaphenylbenzene-based donors 5 and 1 were recorded under identical conditions as above (Figure 3C), it clearly showed identical magnitudes of currents for both 1 and 5. Such an observation confirms that both 5 and 1 eject six electrons at their respective potentials.   Figure 3 Square-wave voltammograms of mixtures of 0.25 mM 5 and 1.5 mM 8 (A), 0.25 mM 1 and 1.5 mM ferrocene (B), and 0.25 mM each of 1 and 5 (C) in CH2Cl2 containing 0.2 M n-Bu4NPF6 at 22 °C.  In order to confirm the multiple electron-transfer processes involved in the CV peaks of 1 and 5, we carried out redox titrations (which are tantamount to coulometry) using a hindered naphthalene (NAP)4 and a hydroquinone ether (MA)10 cation radicals as robust one-electron oxidants (see below).   Thus, Figure 4A showed the spectral changes attendant upon the reduction of a dark-blue solution of NAP+• SbCl6- (λmax = 672, 616, 503, and 396 nm; ε672 = 9300 M-1 cm-1) by an incremental addition of 1/6 equiv of neutral 1 to afford a bright green hexacation radical 16+• (λmax = 415, 550, and 1105 nm, ε1105 = 1400 M-1 cm-1) in dichloromethane at 22 °C, i.e., eq 1.   Figure 4 (A) Spectral changes attendant upon the reduction of 1.7 × 10-4 M NAP+•SbCl6- (blue) by incremental addition of 1.2 × 10-3 M 1 to its hexacation radical 16+• (green) in CH2Cl2 at 22 °C. Inset. A plot of depletion of absorbance of NAP+• (blue circles, at 672 nm) and an increase of the absorbance of 16+• (green squares, at 1100 nm) against the equivalent of added 1. (B) Spectral changes attendant upon the reduction of 1.3 × 10-4 M MA+• BF4- (red) by incremental addition of 1.3 × 10-3 M 5 to its hexacation 56+ (yellow-orange) in CH2Cl2 at 22 °C. Inset:  plot of depletion of absorbance of MA+• (red circles, at 518 nm) and an increase of the absorbance of 56+ (orange circles, at 800 nm) against the equivalent of added 5.  The presence of well-defined isosbestic points at λmax = 388, 520, and 714 nm in Figure 4 established the clean electron transfer from 1 to NAP+•. Furthermore, a plot of the depletion of NAP+• and formation of 16+• against the increments of added 1 in Figure 4A (inset), established that NAP+• was completely consumed after the addition of 1/6 equiv of 1; and the resulting absorption spectrum of 16+• remained unchanged upon further addition of neutral 1 (i.e., eq 1). A similar redox titration of hexaferrocenyl donor 5 with MA+• BF4- (λmax = 518 and 486 (sh) nm; ε518 = 7300 M-1 cm-1) yielded 56+ (λmax = 360, 415, 512, 600, and 800 nm; ε800 = 1180 M-1 cm-1) according to the eq 2.11  Moreover, the presence of well-defined isosbestic points at λmax = 460 and 547 nm in Figure 4B as well as a plot of the depletion of MA+• and formation of 56+ against the increments of added 5in Figure 4B (inset) established that MA+• was completely consumed after the addition of 1/6 equiv of 5, and the resulting absorption spectrum of 56+ remained unchanged upon further addition of neutral 5 (i.e., eq 2). Furthermore, the stability of both 16+• and 56+ is attested by the fact that their reduction with zinc dust regenerated the neutral 1 and 5 in quantitative yield. In summary, we have accomplished a simple synthesis of hitherto unknown (dendritic) hexakis(4-ferrocenylphenyl)benzene (5) and confirmed its structure by X-ray crystallography. We have also demonstrated that both hexaaryl- and hexaferrocenylbenzene donors (i.e., 1 and 5) undergo reversible six-electron oxidation at a constant potential by cyclic and square-wave voltammetry. The ejection of six electrons by 1 and 5 was further confirmed by redox titrations (which are tantamount to coulometry) using stable aromatic oxidants. We are currently exploring the potential applications of these materials and a variety of other hexaarylbenzene derivatives for the preparation of photonic devices. Acknowledgment Acknowledgments. We are grateful to Professor F. A. Khan (State University of West Georgia at Carrolton) for the mass spectral data of 1 and 5 and the Petroleum Research Fund, administered by the American Chemical Society, and the National Science Foundation (Career award) for financial support. References 1(a) Zimmermann, T. J.; Freundel, O.; Gompper, R.; Muller, T. J. J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 3305. (b) Keegstra, M. A.; De, Feyter, S.; De, Schryver, F. C.; Mullen, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 774. (c) Wang, S.; Oldham, W. J., Jr.; Hudock, R. A., Jr.; Bazan, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 124, 5695. (d) Watson, M. D.; Fechtenkötter, A.; Müllen, K. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 1267 2(a) Fillaut, J.-L.; Linares, J.; Astruc, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 2460. (b) Blackstock, S. C.; Selby, T. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.1998, 120, 12155. (c) Bonvoisin, J.; Launay, J.-P.; Auweraer, M. V. d.; Schryver, F. C. D. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 5052. (d) Nelsen, S. F.; Ismagilov, R. F.; Powell, D. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 10213. (e) Bauld, N. L.; Bellville, D. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 825. 3(a) Lambert, C.; Noll, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2107. (b) Lambert, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7337 and references therein. (c) Rathore, R.; Burns, C. L.; Abdelwahed, S. H. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1689. (d) Also see:  Yu, Y.; Bond, A. D.; Leonard, P. W.; Timofeeva, T. V.; Volhardt, K. P. C.; Whitener, G. D.; Yakovenko, A. A. Chem. Commun. 2006, 2572. 4Rathore, R.; Burns, C. L.; Deselnicu, M. I. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2887. 5Compare:  Flanagan, J. B.; Margel, S.; Bard, A. J.; Anson, F.C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 4248 and references therein. 6Mio, M. J.; Kopel, L. C.; Braun, J. B.; Gadzikwa, T. L.; Hull, K. L.; Brisbois, R. G.; Markworth, C. J.; Grieco, P. A. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3199. 7Ambroise, A.; Wagner, R. W.; Rao, P. D.; Riggs, J. A.; Hascoat, P.; Diers, J. R.; Seth, J.; Lammi, R. K.; Bocian, D. F.; Holten, D.; Lindsey, J. S. Chem. Mater. 2001, 13, 1023. 8Cambridge Crystallographic database. 9(a) Nishio, M.; Umezawa, Y.; Hirota, M.; Takeuchi, Y. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 8665. (b) Nishio, M. Cryst. Eng. Commun. 2004, 6, 130 and references therein. (c) Nishio, M.; Hiroto, M.; Umezama, Y. In The CH/pi Interaction, Evidence, Nature and Consequences. Methods in Stereochemical Analysis; Marchand, A. P., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: New York, 1988. 10Rathore, R.; Burns, C. L.; Deselnicu, M. I. Org. Synth. 2005, 82, 1. Also see Rathore, R.; Kochi, J. K. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 4399. 11For the oxidation of 5, we employed the tetrafluoroborate salt of hydroquinone ether (MA) cation radical instead of hexachloroantimonate (SbCl6-) salt because of the fact that SbCl6- anion itself is an oxidant and oxidizes ferrocene to ferrocenium cation; compare:  Rathore, R.; Kumar, A. S.; Lindeman, S. V.; Kochi, J. K.J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 5847 

Simultaneous Ejection of Six Electrons at a Constant Potential by Hexakis(4-ferrocenylphenyl)benzene

https://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1646&amp;context=chem_fac

Simultaneous Ejection of Six Electrons at a Constant Potential by Hexakis(4-ferrocenylphenyl)benzene

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

epublications@Marquette