CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
research
Toxicity of dietary methylmercury to fish: Derivation of ecologically meaningful threshold concentrations
Authors
Niladri Basu
Neil M. Burgess
+8 more
Linda M. Campbell
David C. Depew
Ed W. Devlin
Paul E. Drevnick
Chad R. Hammerschmidt
Cheryl A. Murphy
Mark B. Sandheinrich
James G. Wiener
Publication date
17 May 2012
Publisher
'Wiley'
Doi
Cite
Abstract
Threshold concentrations associated with adverse effects of dietary exposure to methylmercury (MeHg) were derived from published results of laboratory studies on a variety of fish species. Adverse effects related to mortality were uncommon, whereas adverse effects related to growth occurred only at dietary MeHg concentrations exceeding 2.5 µg g −1 wet weight. Adverse effects on behavior of fish had a wide range of effective dietary concentrations, but generally occurred above 0.5 µg g −1 wet weight. In contrast, effects on reproduction and other subclinical endpoints occurred at dietary concentrations that were much lower (<0.2 µg g −1 wet wt). Field studies generally lack information on dietary MeHg exposure, yet available data indicate that comparable adverse effects have been observed in wild fish in environments corresponding to high and low MeHg contamination of food webs and are in agreement with the threshold concentrations derived here from laboratory studies. These thresholds indicate that while differences in species sensitivity to MeHg exposure appear considerable, chronic dietary exposure to low concentrations of MeHg may have significant adverse effects on wild fish populations but remain little studied compared to concentrations in mammals or birds. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2012; 31: 1536–1547. © 2012 SETACPeer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/92130/1/etc_1859_sm_SupplReferences.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/92130/2/1859_ftp.pd
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
info:doi/10.1002%2Fetc.1859
Last time updated on 26/04/2021
Deep Blue Documents
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:deepblue.lib.umich.edu:202...
Last time updated on 13/07/2012