This paper aims at discussing games and plays and the way children perceive their realities throughout these dynamical processes. In other words, playing subsidizes childhood humanization. Here we assume the importance of pedagogical work with children within school and we problematize how education can contribute to the relationship between children and play, and how it can help the process of childhood humanizatio

Carvalho, R. S.

Colombo, B. D.

Oliveira E. da R

DSpace at Belgorod State University

Richarles Souza de Carvalho, Bruno Dandolini Colombo, Eloisa da Rosa Oliveira. Games and play: paths towards childhood humanization // Research Result. Pedagogic and Psychology of Education. – Т.3, Vol.1, 2017.  52 ПЕДАГОГИКА И ПСИХОЛОГИЯ ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ PEDAGOGIC AND PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION DOI: 10.18413/2313-8971-2017-3-1-52-54 УДК 37.013 Richarles Souza de Carvalho, Bruno Dandolini Colombo,  Eloisa da Rosa Oliveira GAMES AND PLAY: PATHS TOWARDS CHILDHOOD HUMANIZATION Department of Humanities, Sciences and Education UNESC, Criciuma, Santa Catarina. Brazil; E-mail: rsc@unesc.net Department of Humanities, Sciences and Education UNESC, Criciúma, Santa Catarina. Brazil; E-mail: bruno@unesc.net Department of Humanities, Sciences and Education UNESC, Criciúma, Santa Catarina. Brazil; E-mail: elo@unesc.net Abstract This paper aims at discussing games and plays and the way children perceive their realities throughout these dynamical processes. The theory of game activity was developed by D.B. Elkonin based on the psychological theories of interaction and language acquisition ofL.S. Vygotsky. Caretakers and educators шт pre-school educational systems should understandthe nature and importance of the play activity of children for the formation of their personalities.Playing is a manner for children to satisfy their needs in order to adapt themselves to social life.Playing is the way to understand reality and the relationship of students with reality. In otherwords, playing subsidizes childhood humanization. Here we assume the importance of pedagogi-cal work with children within school and we problematize how education can contribute to the re-lationship between children and play, and how it can help the process of childhood humanization.Keywords: childhood; cultural-historical theory; humanization; game; play.Ришарлз Соуза де Карвалью, Бруно Дандолини Коломбо,  Элоиза Роза Оливейра ИГРЫ И ИГРОВАЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТЬ  КАК УСЛОВИЯ СОЦИАЛИЗАЦИИ ДЕТЕЙ Университет Южной Санта Катарины,г. Крисиума, штат Санта Катарина. Бразилия; E-mail: rsc@unesc.net Университет Южной Санта Катарины, г. Крисиума, штат Санта Катарина. Бразилия; E-mail: bruno@unesc.net Университет Южной Санта Катарины, г. Крисиума, штат Санта Катарина. Бразилия; E-mail: elo@unesc.net Аннотация В статье рассмотрены вопросы о роли игры и игровой деятельности в социализации детей. Теория игровой деятельности была разработана Д.Б. Элькониным на основе психологической теории Л.С. Выготского о деятельности и усвоения языка. Воспитатели дошкольных образова-тельных учреждений должны понимать природу и важность игровой деятельности детей в формировании их личности. Игра для детей является способом удовлетворения их потребно-стей в процессе освоения общественной жизни. Игра является средством познания действи-тельности и отношений детей с окружающим миром. В игре происходит социализация. В ста-тье уделено внимание роли педагогической работы с детьми, и представлены размышления о том, какой вклад образование может внести в отношения между детьми и игровой деятельно-стью, в процессы социализации детей через игры и игровую деятельность. Ключевые слова: детство; культурно-историческая теория; социализация; игра; игровая деятельность. During the course of an individual development process, there is a transformation of the ways of rela-tionship with the world, also changing the possibili-ties of appropriation of this world. At pre-school age (0–5 years), developmental period reflects the social place where children are at this moment of life, as well as their relationship with the world and with themselves. Play stands out as the main interaction type between children and the world, because this connection gives them the opportunity to appropriate of their realities. “The main activity of children in pre-school age is the game” [7, p. 152].  Famous Russian educator K.D. Ushinsky raised the importance of using games in education... He wrote: “Game - is a free activity of child, and if we compare the interest in the game, as well as the num-ber and diversity of the traces left by the game in the child’s soul, with similar effects of teaching in the first four or five years, then of course all the benefits Richarles Souza de Carvalho, Bruno Dandolini Colombo, Eloisa da Rosa Oliveira. Games and play: paths towards childhood humanization // Research Result. Pedagogic and Psychology of Education. – Т.3, Vol.1, 2017.  53 ПЕДАГОГИКА И ПСИХОЛОГИЯ ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ PEDAGOGIC AND PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION will be on the side of the game. It shapes all aspects of the human’s soul, mind, heart and will” [5, p. 7]. Playing is a manner for children to satisfy their needs in order to appropriate of social life, of behav-ioral means, of adult relationships and activities which are not directly accessible to children. During the game children want to act out as the adult do, be-cause of this, their ludic actions correspond to adults actions. The distinguishing trait of playing is that it allows children to do actions without necessarily ob-taining results. Games are based on reality. Development of children “will evolve only through interaction with real surroundings and within the context of peer rela-tionships” [3, p. 17]. The role acted by children in game is essential; it is a reference to their behavior. Playing role is a sign or a psychic tool that allows children to dominate their stimuli that go on them-selves and so dominate their own behavior. Nasci-mento & Dantas exemplify that by using an image of playing in zoo. If a child takes on the role of an ani-mal handler, she/he will attend all the real functions of an animal handler. On the possibility for an educator to work peda-gogically with playing, Nascimento & Dantas state: “Although children, in their daily actions, create games with protagonists, it is not denied the possibil-ity of education to work pedagogically with games, that is, to work pedagogically with the main activity of children of pre-school age” [7, p. 152]. It is very important to continue using games and plays at elementary school, because “they play a sig-nificant role in physical and moral development of each child … The collective activity of younger shool pupils is necessarily permeated with games ” [9].  Play within the educational process, besides re-quiring intentional and explicit organization of an activity that will be appropriated by children, also requires the building of a specific way of educational process organization. According to Nascimento & Dantas, the way to pedagogically organize social ac-tivities to be appropriated by children is through us-age of themes.  Themes are not simply a didactical resource or a more suitable technique to work with games for a pre-school age children. They are, first of all, a social tool to organize education. Game is an axis to under-stand reality and the relationship of students with re-ality. We assume that themes are a pedagogical way to work with children social activities within the school [7, p. 155]. Nascimento & Dantas are saying that working with themes in kindergarten is not equivalent with themes at school. It should not be only adding contexts to kinesthetic skills, but organ-izing cultural body reality which allows children to appropriate of this reality [7].  S. Rubinstein states that playing is one of themost transcendental phenomena of life. It can be seen as an inutile activity, however, despite being inutile it is very necessary. “For human beings, play is a son of work. This relation between play and work happens through the content of playing. Every play reproduc-es, in general, certain ways of practical activities” [8, p. 110]. Play is related to praxis, influencing the world. As the products of human activity, play trans-forms reality and changes the world.  Controlling a wider area of reality by children (not entirely accessible area) can be gained through the games. According to Araujo, Miguéis e Nasci-mento, in cultural-historical theory, game is assumed as an activity when people reconstruct social relations and, within this process, new psychic functions are constructed. Game is a peculiar human activity throughout which children develop themselves while appropriate social experiences built by humankind. “The basis of play/game is social because of its origin, that is, play/game is born within children’s life conditions in society” [1, p. 36-37]. It means that game reconstructs reality in a single way. People’s norms are redone by singular means more explicitly in people’s consciousness, via symbolic situations. This way, game has its function which is to permit children to understand the world of human relations and adults activities in order to humanize.  Play comes from the contact with the world and it depends on all reciprocal human relations where children are also immersed. According to Rubinstein, the activity in play is an activity with an immediate interest basis, not a utile effect: “Play is the way how children’s necessities and requests happen within their possibilities” [8, p. 114]. Through the game children comprehend the world around them. As stat-ed by L. Vygotsky, playing creates a zone of proxi-mal development on children. This way, they often behave beyond their actual age. “In an imaginary sit-uation, the creation of voluntary efforts and plans for real life – everything is in the activity of playing, which is the highest level of pre-school children de-velopment” [10, p. 135]. Play is not a mere operating system that mature in the body, not even a movement that occurs be-cause of the accumulation of energy. Some theories yet consider the existence of a childish nature for games. Those theories are frequently related to kin-dergarten background. As said by Araujo, Miguéis & Nascimento, it is a false idea, because games are not a reality for children since ever. They came up after a human phylogenic process. Elkonin states that “in an underdeveloped society with a primitive community organization work, children go into adult productive labor very early, taking part of it along with their po-tentials” [2, p. 56].  Richarles Souza de Carvalho, Bruno Dandolini Colombo, Eloisa da Rosa Oliveira. Games and play: paths towards childhood humanization // Research Result. Pedagogic and Psychology of Education. – Т.3, Vol.1, 2017.  54 ПЕДАГОГИКА И ПСИХОЛОГИЯ ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ PEDAGOGIC AND PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION The connection between children and adult work make stronger this linking with society. In the words of Elkonin, “on that social development level and with that status, children didn’t need to reproduce work neither to establish special relationship with adults, they didn’t need a game with protagonists” [2, p. 60]. It is in a complexification process that children’s work, con-comitantly, moves the complicated spheres of adult’s work into more and more reduced activities.  According to A. Leontiev, the fantasy, which is intrinsic to children, is also engendered in play. “Children don’t imagine with the purpose of playing, but in the process of playing they imagine” [6, p. 296]. In order to do actions and operations inherentto adult world, children organize various substitu-tions, like using accessible objects and places to act:any plate can be a steering wheel; any room can be anoffice. Children want, themselves, to drive a car, torow a boat, but they cannot do that obviously becausethey don’t master the operations required by real ob-jective contradictions of these given actions [6,p. 121]. Any education is intrinsically national ac-cording to K.D. Ushinsky, and it is best done in thechild’s native language and with the use of this na-tion’s culture,which is also expressed with ethnicgames, folklore plays and traditional toys. These as-pects of education are studied by ethnopedagogy.“Ethnopedagogy examines the process of social in-teraction and social influence in which to educate,develop personality, assimilate social norms, valuesand practices; collects and organizes the folkknowledge about the education and training of chil-dren, folk wisdom, as reflected in the religious teach-ings, tales, legends, epic parables, songs, riddles,proverbs and sayings, games, toys, etc.” [4, p. 8].Lastly, if we accept that the objective adult world is not accessible to children, play and games will assume a specific and important role in this hu-man development process. Playing is a fundamental activity in the children’s education; it is the best ac-tivity to institute the relation ‘children-world’, allow-ing the appropriation of historically produced cultural productions. The great amount of human objects challenges children with problems to be solved. Those objects appear to children naively. Human aspects arise for children as human acts towards those objects. Our task as educational workers is, thus, trying to focus on the work with themes in the educational environ-ment through the perspective we have presented in this paper. We should remember that our main goal is to contribute to children’s development in the process of understanding themselves and the world around them. References: 1. Araujo, E.S.; Miguéis, M.R.; Nascimento, C.P. Ojogo como atividade: contribuições da teoria histórico-cultural. Revista Semestral da Associação Brasileira de Psicologia Escolar e Educacional (ABRAPEE). v. 13, n. 2, p. 293-302. jul./dez. 2009.Elkonin, D.B. Psicologia dojogo. São Paulo: Martin Fontes, 1998.2. Guseva, L.G., Sosnowski, A.N. Russian Educa-tion in Transition: trends at the primary level // Canadian and International Education. 1997, v. 26, n. 1, pp. 14-31. URL: http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cie-eci/vol26/iss1/3 (date of ac-cess: December 21, 2016). 3. Guseva, L.G. Ethnopedagogy and interculturalcommunication in education. Magnitogorsk : NMSTU – 2015. – 43 p. 4. Guseva, L.G., Konstantin Ushinsky: teaching ac-cording to the nature of a child / Modern developmental psychology: main trends and prospects of research. Proc. of the 2nd international scientific conference on Oct. 20-21, 2016. – Prague : Vědecko vydavatelské centrum«Sociosféra-CZ», 2016. – 139 p. Pp. 7-9 URL:http://sociosphera.com/files/conference/2016/k-10_20_16.pdf (date of access: Devcember 21, 2016).5. Leontiev, A.N. Os princípios psicológicos dabrincadeira pré-escolar. In: Vygotsky, L.S.; Luria, A.R; Leontiev, A.N. Linguagem, desenvolvimento e aprendiza-gem. 12. ed. São Paulo: Ícone, 2012. p. 119-142.  6. Nascimento, C.P.; Dantas, L.E.P.B.T. O desen-volvimento histórico-cultural da criança nas aulas de Edu-cação Física: possibilidades de trabalho a partir da ativida-de principal e dos temas. Revista Brasileira de Ciências do Esporte, Campinas. v. 31, n. 1, p. 147-161, set. de 2009. Rubinstein, S.L. Princípios de Psicologia geral. Lisboa: Estampa, 1977.  7. Shemchuk, L.G. Extra-curricula activities in smallgroups as a factor of moral education of elementary school students, Moscow State Pedagogical University. Candidate Ped. Sci. dissertation. М., 1991. 8. Vygotsky, L.S. A Formação Social da Mente: odesenvolvimento dos processos psicológicos superiores. 6. ed. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1998. About the authors: Richarles Souza de Carvalho, Doctor of Language Sciences Bruno Dandolini Colombo, Master in Education Eloisa da Rosa Oliveira, Master in Literature Данные авторов: Ришарлз Соуза де Карвалью, доктор филологи-ческих наук Бруно Дандолини Коломбо, магистр педагогики Элоиза Роза Оливейра, магистр филологических наук 

Games and play: paths towards childhood humanization

http://dspace.bsu.edu.ru/bitstream/123456789/40099/1/Richarles_Souza_de_Carvalho_Igry_17.pdf

Games and play: paths towards childhood humanization

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

DSpace at Belgorod State University

DSpace at Belgorod State University