From Partial to Global Asynchronous Reliable Broadcast

Abstract

Broadcast is a fundamental primitive in distributed computing. It allows a sender to consistently distribute a message among n recipients. The seminal result of Pease et al. [JACM\u2780] shows that in a complete network of synchronous bilateral channels, broadcast is achievable if and only if the number of corruptions is bounded by t < n/3. To overcome this bound, a fascinating line of works, Fitzi and Maurer [STOC\u2700], Considine et al. [JC\u2705], and Raykov [ICALP\u2715], proposed strengthening the communication network by assuming partial synchronous broadcast channels, which guarantee consistency among a subset of recipients. We extend this line of research to the asynchronous setting. We consider reliable broadcast protocols assuming a communication network which provides each subset of b parties with reliable broadcast channels. A natural question is to investigate the trade-off between the size b and the corruption threshold t. We answer this question by showing feasibility and impossibility results: - A reliable broadcast protocol ?_{RBC} that: - For 3 ? b ? 4, is secure up to t < n/2 corruptions. - For b > 4 even, is secure up to t < ((b-4)/(b-2) n + 8/(b-2)) corruptions. - For b > 4 odd, is secure up to t < ((b-3)/(b-1) n + 6/(b-1)) corruptions. - A nonstop reliable broadcast ?_{nRBC}, where parties are guaranteed to obtain output as in reliable broadcast but may need to run forever, secure up to t < (b-1)/(b+1) n corruptions. - There is no protocol for (nonstop) reliable broadcast secure up to t ? (b-1)/(b+1) n corruptions, implying that ?_{RBC} is an asymptotically optimal reliable broadcast protocol, and ?_{nRBC} is an optimal nonstop reliable broadcast protocol