Abstract

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The analysis of protein structures provides fundamental insight into most biochemical functions and consequently into the cause and possible treatment of diseases. As the structures of most known proteins cannot be solved experimentally for technical or sometimes simply for time constraints, <it>in silico </it>protein structure prediction is expected to step in and generate a more complete picture of the protein structure universe. Molecular modeling of protein structures is a fast growing field and tremendous works have been done since the publication of the very first model. The growth of modeling techniques and more specifically of those that rely on the existing experimental knowledge of protein structures is intimately linked to the developments of high resolution, experimental techniques such as NMR, X-ray crystallography and electron microscopy. This strong connection between experimental and <it>in silico </it>methods is however not devoid of criticisms and concerns among modelers as well as among experimentalists.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In this paper, we focus on homology-modeling and more specifically, we review how it is perceived by the structural biology community and what can be done to impress on the experimentalists that it can be a valuable resource to them. We review the common practices and provide a set of guidelines for building better models. For that purpose, we introduce the H-factor, a new indicator for assessing the quality of homology models, mimicking the R-factor in X-ray crystallography. The methods for computing the H-factor is fully described and validated on a series of test cases.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>We have developed a web service for computing the H-factor for models of a protein structure. This service is freely accessible at <url>http://koehllab.genomecenter.ucdavis.edu/toolkit/h-factor</url>.</p

    Similar works